And radical Islam.

Perhaps if they are all burnt alive it might reverse the effects.

---

Perhaps if they are all burnt alive it might reverse the effects.

Wouldn't that just contribute to the hottest year on record?

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

The Chair of the House Science Committee just said Trump is the only source of what is true.


To recap.. The only source of truth is a thin-skinned, pathological liar who flip flops on everything and believes the entire world revolves around him.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

Wouldn't that just contribute to the hottest year on record?

Perhaps but in the long run billions would be saved in healthcare, education, welfare and fuel emissions would be reduced massively. Less people > better world.

---

The Chair of the House Science Committee just said Trump is the only source of what is true.


To recap.. The only source of truth is a thin-skinned, pathological liar who flip flops on everything and believes the entire world revolves around him.

 

Regardless of who is in office, this is one of the most horrifying things any elected official could possibly say.  

 

I think I legitimately felt worried for the first time after reading it yesterday.

---

Regardless of who is in office, this is one of the most horrifying things any elected official could possibly say.  

 

I think I legitimately felt worried for the first time after reading it yesterday.

What's interesting about that, is in his press conference today, when talking about torture, he said he thinks it works, but that he would defer to Mattis on the issue because he knows more about it than he does. Didn't really sound like a guy that thinks it can only be his way of thinking.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

What's interesting about that, is in his press conference today, when talking about torture, he said he thinks it works, but that he would defer to Mattis on the issue because he knows more about it than he does. Didn't really sound like a guy that thinks it can only be his way of thinking.

What does that have to do with Science?

---

What does that have to do with Science?

 

The climate "scientists" torture the data until it agrees to a need for continued funding. So yeah, it has nothing to do with science.


 

Don't agree? You never did respond to the NASA lie that sea level rise is accelerating when every tide gauge shows the rate has been constant.

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

What does that have to do with Science?

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to confuse you. I'll use smaller words next time.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

Perhaps but in the long run billions would be saved in healthcare, education, welfare and fuel emissions would be reduced massively. Less people > better world.

 

Man, that last statements gets to the heart of the environmental religion. All these casual followers are like fools at the so called Women's March last week, rallying to support an ideology that ultimately craves their enslavement and destruction.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to confuse you. I'll use smaller words next time.

 

He needs 3 sources and a peer review.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Man, that last statements gets to the heart of the environmental religion. All these casual followers are like fools at the so called Women's March last week, rallying to support an ideology that ultimately craves their enslavement and destruction.

Maybe I'm getting the wrong end of the stick on this but I havn't really seen much that says environmental nuts want less people.

---

The climate "scientists" torture the data until it agrees to a need for continued funding. So yeah, it has nothing to do with science.


Don't agree? You never did respond to the NASA lie that sea level rise is accelerating when every tide gauge shows the rate has been constant.

You are spreading lies. So is this in all sciences or just the ones your politics don't agree with?

---

You are spreading lies. So is this in all sciences or just the ones your politics don't agree with?

 

LOL.  Triggered.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

LOL. Triggered.

I asked a perfectly valid question.

---

I asked a perfectly valid question.

 

What MalabarJag said is pretty much true.  The global warming climate "scientists" are probably the worst offenders.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

What MalabarJag said is pretty much true. The <del>global warming</del> climate "scientists" are probably the worst offenders.

Scientists depend on funding to continue doing their research so why would it only apply to climate scientists? And they are only the worst offenders again because their science doesn't agree with your politics.

---

Academia has become a bit of a progressive echo chamber. The result ends up being that certain ideas are accepted as truth even when there is little to no actual evidence for it. I wouldn't say that applies to all findings but there have been some studies that confirm that this happens. It usually happens more in the social sciences but the hallmarks are there in some of the hard sciences as well. 

 

Edit: When we see taxpayer dollars going to fund shrimp on treadmill studies, don't be so surprised when we start asking questions about where our money went.   

---

Calling Deshawn Watson a future bust since 3/19/17. If I eat crow, I will keep this in here and proclaim JackCity a genius. 

Scientists depend on funding to continue doing their research so why would it only apply to climate scientists? And they are only the worst offenders again because their science doesn't agree with your politics.

 

Who says that it applies only to global warming climate "scientists"?  My not wanting MY money going to global warming climate change "scientists" has nothing to do with my politics.  Tax dollars should not go to the global warming climate change science religion.  If the global warming climate change "scientists" want funding, maybe they should start a go fund me account.  That way you liberals can fund your fantasy without draining tax dollars for real science.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Who says that it applies only to <del>global warming</del> climate "scientists"? My not wanting MY money going to <del>global warming</del> climate change "scientists" has nothing to do with my politics. Tax dollars should not go to the <del>global warming</del> climate change <del>science</del> religion. If the <del>global warming</del> climate change "scientists" want funding, maybe they should start a <a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.gofundme.com/'>go fund me account</a>. That way you liberals can fund your fantasy without draining tax dollars for real science.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/612710'>https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/612710</a>



WASHINGTON, July 29, 2015 — Global climate change will aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries, according to a report the Defense Department sent to Congress yesterday.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/7/pentagon-orders-commanders-to-prioritize-climate-c/'>http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/7/pentagon-orders-commanders-to-prioritize-climate-c/</a>

---