Yep. And don't forget about McCray and Jeremy Harris

Hahahahahaha

---

If he had drafted him, he would have given him every chance to succeed.

If he had drafted him he would've been fired by now.

---

Laughable if you think Thurmond is on Revis level. Thurmond is nothing special

When did I say that?  Its laughable if you think Revis is worth his contract. 

---

I understand that....but lets call a spade a spade and not pretend and act like the signing is some great thing. Its a cog. Its not anything close to a difference maker.


I thought Caldwell said that in this free agency period we were supposed to focus more on the bigger "impact" type of free agent. That has not materialized as of yet.

and how do you know in the right fit and right system they won't produce at a high level and become a difference maker? I don't think anyone expected Marks to play as well as he did. Stop being so negative and try and look a the positives. It's annoying.

---

If he had drafted him, he would have given him every chance to succeed.

Dear Mrs. Gabbert

 

Your son sucks

 

Sincerely,

 

Andrew Jackson

---

I understand that....but lets call a spade a spade and not pretend and act like the signing is some great thing. Its a cog. Its not anything close to a difference maker.


I thought Caldwell said that in this free agency period we were supposed to focus more on the bigger "impact" type of free agent. That has not materialized as of yet.

I try to keep things in perspective. Making the team better is a good thing. Bringing in competition constantly is a good thing. I'm not going bananas over him, but he showed an ability to affect the passer and that is an impact player. He impacted plays. He did so 3rd most in the league last year. Maybe Gus and Co can help him get there a little quicker and get sacks. He is a guy with low risk and potential upside. It would be a solid signing.

---

Love the thread.  Somewhere over the years I lost my extreme passion but I do still like these discussions.

---

Byrd doesn't have anything close to Earl Thomas's range and wants $9M a year. Beadles fits the zone-blocking scheme. You're a negative Nancy. Please tell us whom you would have lured here (against the bidding of 31 other teams) and what you would pay each of them so we can sit back and laugh at your childish take on reality. 

 

Byrd is one of the best ball hawks from the position in the league. He recorded 9 INT's one season,,,,,he's still got his best years ahead of him. 

 

You people downplay Byrd, who's a legit playmaker and trump up signings/ potential signings like this Detroit DE that has never topped 3 QB sacks in a season....upside down :wacko: :wacko: 

---

If he had drafted him he would've been fired by now.

hahahahah is this guy seriously upset Ganbert was traded?

---

and how do you know in the right fit and right system they won't produce at a high level and become a difference maker? I don't think anyone expected Marks to play as well as he did. Stop being so negative and try and look a the positives. It's annoying.

Great point. This is how you find those guys. If you don't sign them you won't find them.

---

When did I say that? Its laughable if you think Revis is worth his contract.

If he's cut, he won't get the 15 million. We have the cap space, and he's easily a top 5 corner in the game, so what's the problem?

---

Byrd is one of the best ball hawks from the position in the league. He recorded 9 INT's one season,,,,,he's still got his best years ahead of him.


You people downplay Byrd, who's a legit playmaker and trump up signings/ potential signings like this Detroit DE that has never topped 3 QB sacks in a season....upside down :wacko: :wacko:

Byrd would be a good signing. We will just have to wait and see.

---

Love the thread. Somewhere over the years I lost my extreme passion but I do still like these discussions.

Where did your passion go dufus?

---

Great point. This is how you find those guys. If you don't sign them you won't find them.

exactly. Look at Seattle.

---

hahahahah is this guy seriously upset Ganbert was traded?

Nah he's just bored and trolling. Nobody could be that dumb.

---

If Revis is cut, why not try and get him? Instantly our top CB.

 

I agree with this. If Revis is cut, thats an impact type signing the Jags should make or try to. 

---

Hahahahahaha

Your a moron. Lets sign revis for a crap load of money just for him to get hurt and not care.


I mentioned those guys because we have players there to compete for playing time.


Your worse than TMD but go on and please tell me how and why we should sign Revis to a huge contract. PLEASE TELL ME DUDE

---

Shock the world

and how do you know in the right fit and right system they won't produce at a high level and become a difference maker? I don't think anyone expected Marks to play as well as he did. Stop being so negative and try and look a the positives. It's annoying.

 

Uh, he'll be 29....how many NFL DE's "break out" at 29 when they've been nothing more than a cog their entire careers??????

---

I agree with this. If Revis is cut, thats an impact type signing the Jags should make or try to.

He has a lot of risk. I'd much rather get Byrd. Revis still going to want big money.

---

Dear Mrs. Gabbert

 

Your son sucks

 

Sincerely,

 

Andrew Jackson

 

Hilarious !!!

---