Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Emmanuel Sanders visited Jaguars signed with Denver/Manning in decline?

#81

Quote:If so, then the last thing you want is smaller WR on the outside. I thought we learned that lesson with Mike Thomas....apparently no, we need to learn it like 5 times over. 
Mike Thomas is 5'8", not 5'11"

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#82

Quote:I'd like to have him.. Can never have enough weapons. Who do we lose if he happens to sign though? M.Brown?
 

Probably....and that would be dumb. Brown will give you everything Em Sanders will, if not more should he continue to develop off of his last season. And Mike Brown will be lots cheaper. 

Reply

#83
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2014, 05:23 PM by The Mad Dog.)

Quote:Mike Thomas is 5'8", not 5'11"
 

They both are similar in that neither win any/ many one on one battles with the DB for jump balls/ deeper passes. 

 

I hate hate hate the notion of smaller WR on the outside. Hate it!!!

 

I swear people don't learn from past Jags personnel mistakes around here. 


Reply

#84

I wish people would make their arguments without living in fantasy land, aka adding Justin Blackmon to the list of receivers we have or could possibly count on.


<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
Reply

#85

Quote:They both are similar in that neither win any/ many one on one battles with the DB for jump balls/ deeper passes. 

 

I hate hate hate the notion of smaller WR on the outside. Hate it!!!

 

I swear people don't learn from past Jags personnel mistakes around here. 
 

Thomas didn't succeed not because he's small, but because he sucks.

 

Steve Smith is small and is a baller.  You can be good and be short.

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#86

Quote:I wish people would make their arguments without living in fantasy land, aka adding Justin Blackmon to the list of receivers we have or could possibly count on.


He`ll be back
Reply

#87

Quote:He`ll be back
 

Wishful thinking.

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
Reply

#88

Quote:Probably....and that would be dumb. Brown will give you everything Em Sanders will, if not more should he continue to develop off of his last season. And Mike Brown will be lots cheaper.


But according to you, Ace is supposed to get hurt sooo having Emmanuel will be fine to have and fill on
Shock the world
Reply

#89

Since Henne is the starting QB, the Jaguars do need a 6'3" WR because Henne's 2 best and only passes are the sideline backshoulder and intermediate seam/post.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#90

Quote:Probably....and that would be dumb. Brown will give you everything Em Sanders will, if not more should he continue to develop off of his last season. And Mike Brown will be lots cheaper. 
Just stop.

 

 

E Sanders 40  -  4.41

 

Mike Brown   -  4.69

 

Brown will not give you everything Sanders will. 

Reply

#91

Quote:Thomas didn't succeed not because he's small, but because he sucks.

 

Steve Smith is small and is a baller.  You can be good and be short.
 

Ahhh, the Steve Smith anomaly.....I love when this ONE is thrown out there every time people say that outside WR need to be bigger. 

 

Steve Smith in his prime ran a 4.3 something and was strong as an ox. And had a bit of leap in him. 

 

Em Sanders is not that. 

Reply

#92

Quote:But according to you, Ace is supposed to get hurt sooo having Emmanuel will be fine to have and fill on
 

Mike Brown is already here. 

Reply

#93

Quote:Exactly.  He just needs something to whine about. 
 

It really is like Mad (Dog) Libs.  Same tired arguments with only the names changed.

 

better roster > worse roster

 

Obviously they are targeting guys they feel can make us better.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#94

Quote:Just stop.

 

 

E Sanders 40  -  4.41

 

Mike Brown   -  4.69

 

Brown will not give you everything Sanders will. 
 

Mike plays faster than that, we saw it last year. 

Reply

#95

Quote:Mike plays faster than that, we saw it last year. 
 

Sanders plays faster than 4.4

 

Sanders plays like he should be running a 4.2

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
Reply

#96

Quote:Mike plays faster than that, we saw it last year. 
fantasy  ^

 

He's a smart route runner. He is NOT fast.  At all. 

Reply

#97

Quote:Sanders plays faster than 4.4

 

Sanders plays like he should be running a 4.2
 

Amazing then that before last season his TD total was 2, and he was nothing more than a fringe player. 

 

Guys that actually <b><i>play </i></b>closer to a 4.2 as you suggest are more impactful than Em Sanders. 

 

 


 

 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#98

What can Brown do for you


Reply

#99

Quote:If so, then the last thing you want is smaller WR on the outside. I thought we learned that lesson with Mike Thomas....apparently no, we need to learn it like 5 times over. 
 

Different QB/OC/HC/GM/Owner/Opposite WR but Sanders played outside this year on the opposite side of Brown and seemed to do pretty good.

Reply


Quote:Amazing then that before last season his TD total was 2, and he was nothing more than a fringe player. 

 

Guys that actually <b><i>play </i></b>closer to a 4.2 as you suggest are more impactful than Em Sanders. 
Mike Wallace and Antonio Brown ring a bell?

 

But yeah, let's also completely take away his best year, which was also his most recent season, where he got more reps to do things. Makes perfect sense.

Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!