Still need to name call huh?


Nice.

Today's modern angry American in a nutshell. This one speaks of irrelevance as if it people come to a message board seeking it.

---

Now it looks like the NYT completely made up the statement by Comey denying the wiretaps.  The NYT piece cited “senior U.S. officials” as the source for their quickly assembled story to provide push-back against the president’s claims of Obama wiretapping.  There was no actual statement or quote from Director Comey himself. In fact, both the FBI and the DOJ refused to comment.

 

You're my point man on this. I'm counting on you. If you can't confirm that this is a Conspiracy of the Highest Order then why waste our time?

 

I certainly will buy into any conspiracy The Chief Birther tells us is true. He certainly has a great track record regarding this kind of thing. 

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

Absolutely! Throw him in and let him rot. He is the single most corrupt president in U.S. history.

 

lol ... you are one insecure guy.

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

They're so dizzy from spinning they simply can't see anything straight.

 

But if they could, they wouldn't want to anyway.  Truth isn't on their side.

 

And you don't look like a fool buying into such a great source of Fake News as Mark Levin?  Do you get all your inside info from right-wing talk radio?

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

And you don't look like a fool buying into such a great source of Fake News as Mark Levin?  Do you get all your inside info from right-wing talk radio?

 

Mark Levin didn't report anything new. He just sourced what the MSM had already reported.

---

Mark Levin didn't report anything new. He just sourced what the MSM had already reported.

 

That's what's so telling of all the triggering it caused.

 

Some outlets have been caught contradicting themselves as they ran with the leaks before they knew they would come back to haunt them.  Never thought they would have to deny their own reports of what they at first celebrated, because they never expected him to win.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Isn't "wiretap" sooooo 20th century?

 

Are we speaking in Trump parables again?

---

Okay, snowflake. Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel special. Enjoy your participation trophies.

You are conversing with the very definition of irrelevant.

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 

Hillary was in on the wiretap:

 

Oct 31, 2016 Hillary tweets:

Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.

---

Hillary was in on the wiretap:

 

Oct 31, 2016 Hillary tweets:

Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.

 

Tweets are not proof, have you not learned this by now?

---

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley


 

Tweets are not proof, have you not learned this by now?

 

When she tweeted that, she provided the proof that she knew about it. 

---

When she tweeted that, she provided the proof that she knew about it.

You don't mind taking large leaps do you? Or it means they were told by the many leaks inside Trumps circle. His circle leaks big league!

---

When she tweeted that, she provided the proof that she knew about it. 

 

She didn't just tweet. She released an entire statement on it. She was hedging her bets that this would finish Trump, she would win, and he would never see the record and request.

 



 

"Computer Scientist".

 

Hilarious, really. So lets see who these "Computer Scientist" really are, and how they were able to discover this hidden link.

---

She didn't just tweet. She released an entire statement on it. She was hedging her bets that this would finish Trump, she would win, and he would never see the record and request.




"Computer Scientist".


Hilarious, really. So lets see who these "Computer Scientist" really are, and how they were able to discover this hidden link.

We're in agreement. Let's get this investigated and get some answers!

---

We're in agreement. Let's get this investigated and get some answers!

 

Absolutely.   Trump should either prove it, or take it back.  

 

Right now, it seems like Trump and his allies are being awfully quiet about this.   Like they don't want to talk about it any more. 

---

Absolutely.   Trump should either prove it, or take it back.  

 

Right now, it seems like Trump and his allies are being awfully quiet about this.   Like they don't want to talk about it any more. 

 

Has the Senate Oversight and Intelligence committee already begun their investigation? I think Trump wants to avoid impeding an investigation, or do anything that might hamper it legally. Just my opinion.

---

Has the Senate Oversight and Intelligence committee already begun their investigation? I think Trump wants to avoid impeding an investigation, or do anything that might hamper it legally. Just my opinion.

 

lol ... yeah, because Donald has always exhibited great respect for the legal process and concern for proper investigative procedures.

 

But, hey, you're trying.

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

Absolutely.   Trump should either prove it, or take it back.  

 

Right now, it seems like Trump and his allies are being awfully quiet about this.   Like they don't want to talk about it any more. 

 

The NYT has already provided the proof.  Jan 20 story sez Trump wiretap info shared with White House. 

---

The NYT has already provided the proof.  Jan 20 story sez Trump wiretap info shared with White House.

No.

---

No.

 

NYT is fake news?

 

I agree.

---