DUHH, o.k.......so you flunked logic 101.... It's not a big deal. Besides, recess is over, time to get back to class.

So let's get this straight; you don't understand the straw man fallacy, you litter your posts with logical fallacies (ad hominem, appeal to authority, straw man), and you think I flunked logic 101? You're not really helping your case here, particularly since I'm the one with a MSc in a subject that covers formal logic and you're barely capable of stringing a sentence together. But you run along now. The big boys have football to discuss.

---

So let's get this straight; you don't understand the straw man fallacy, you litter your posts with logical fallacies (ad hominem, appeal to authority, straw man), and you think I flunked logic 101? You're not really helping your case here, particularly since I'm the one with a MSc in a subject that covers formal logic and you're barely capable of stringing a sentence together. But you run along now. The big boys have football to discuss.

You're boring me. The school that you attended must be SO proud, ha ha. BTW.......I have a master of science degree, so don't try to impress us with your education.........your posts are evidence of that fallacy.

---

It's a shame this ended up at the top of the page; it's not really contributing much to the thread. Why don't we both stop making you look stupid and leave this to football discussion?

---

So a person could not be happy overall with the signings but still not have a legitimate concern about the development of players on the roster?

 

So you think that neither of the second round picks from just last year merit further development and that the team should immediately upgrad the roster with vets at the WR position?

 

How about the both and approach.  We can bring in quality players and still develop the 2nd round receivers.  It's not like we can only do one or the other.  Whoever's better plays....seems like that would be best for the football team.

---

One of these years.............