I am not choosing ignorance. You are.

You're not choosing ignorance.  You're opting for faked data masquerading as science.  That's what lemmings do.  They believe whatever their masters spoon feed them, and you're clearly one of the best at this.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Choosing ignorance is being too scared to educate yourself in a way that might change your views.

 

I did that in the 90s.  I was once liberal thinking and would have voted Clinton in 92 if I hadn't sat it out.

 

However, the more I educated myself, I became more aligned with the libertarian philosophy.

 

I've evolved.  MissJagsFanatic, I've been where you are.  It's why I'm trying to help.  Misinformation or lack of information is what has misguided your opinions.  You admit so by not bothering to read a word I've shared.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

You're wrong!

 

No, you're wrong.

 

Well, you are wrong AND stupid!

 

I know you are, but what am I?

 

 

There's no longer any debate here. Just like there is no longer any debate on issues like abortion or gun control. It's just two sides in their cozy hidy holes, lobbing insults at each other. Can I nuke this thread now?

---

You're wrong!

 

No, you're wrong.

 

Well, you are wrong AND stupid!

 

I know you are, but what am I?

 

 

There's no longer any debate here. Just like there is no longer any debate on issues like abortion or gun control. It's just two sides in their cozy hidy holes, lobbing insults at each other. Can I nuke this thread now?

 

There's only one debating that way, tbh...

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

She still hasn't read my link or answered my question about how the Planet mars is warming w/o man up there.

---

And you are choosing ignorance.  That's fine.

 

The bigger problem is you can't admit you're willfully choosing not to educate yourself.

 

 

There's only one debating that way, tbh...

Right...

 

 

Seriously, can I nuke this pathetic excuse for a discussion now?

---

You are not allowed to tell me to stop.

Thatsthejoke.jpg

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Right...

 

 

Seriously, can I nuke this pathetic excuse for a discussion now?

They have nukes in Denmark? Seems like we ought to sanction them, maybe cut off all the wood for their clogs?

---

Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 

Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.

 

Right...

 

 

Seriously, can I nuke this pathetic excuse for a discussion now?

 

You say that because you disagree.  That's kind of hypocritical, ya think?

 

What you quoted was a reaction to ignoring what I asked her to read and comment on.  It wasn't a Pee Wee Herman response.

 

I think anyone should be free to continue to debate anything climate related that's been shared in this thread.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

You say that because you disagree.  That's kind of hypocritical, ya think?

 

What you quoted was a reaction to ignoring what I asked her to read and comment on.  It wasn't a Pee Wee Herman response.

 

I think anyone should be free to continue to debate anything climate related that's been shared in this thread.

 

I'm well aware which side I'm on and how that currently reflects on me but I so utterly and completely done with this farce of an debate. Here's the summary of this entire stinking thread:

 

"We have science." "No, you don't."

 

There. Done. There is no debate or discussion in here, just two sides diametrically opposed to each other. 

---

Climate change is caused by the smell of poor people. We should cook them and eat them. Simultaneously solving global warming, poverty and world hunger.

---

I am done with this thread because two posters want to spend their lives denying a scientific fact that they can clearly see every day.

---

I am done with this thread because two posters want to spend their lives denying a scientific fact that they can clearly see every day.

You are not allowed to say how they spend their lives. 

---

You are not allowed to say how they spend their lives.

Did she block you yet?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Is there an impact from pollution?  Sure.  Is it enough to create this mythological warming that will cause seas to rise and the world enveloped in water?  I doubt it.  They struggle to explain the pause in temperatures rising.  They can't account for similar warming and cooling cycles centuries ago, long before the industrial revolution and the increased carbon emissions. 

 

You're more than welcome to worship at the church of environmentalism.

Actually, no need. I think you and I are more closely in agreement here than you realize.

---

Did she block you yet?

No clue... She ignores posts when she is called out but randomly replies to some of my posts with her "you can't" or "you aren't allowed" nonsense. 

---

I am done with this thread because two posters want to spend their lives denying a scientific fact that they can clearly see every day.

 

 Make it three posters. 

---

Make it three posters.

Four, but like a logical train of thought she can't see me.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Four, but like a logical train of thought she can't see me.

 

 My guess is the count is going to go MUCH higher.  As it should!

---

I'm not going to debate about this or argue because none of us are experts on a complicated field of study and it won't matter anyways.

 

What I do not understand is how a group of people can on one hand claim the evidence and the experts on the evidence are wrong and that nothing shown can indicate that humans are in some way effecting a change that is happening but on the other take an almost negligible amount of evidence of voter fraud and extrapolate that into it being widespread to the point of bein=g a vast conspiracy of rigging elections. I understand the two are apples/oranges etc.. but the two are similar enough to me in that the only conclusion I can come up with is #becauseparty. 

 

If someone can explain, I'd appreciate it. 

---