The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Acceptable sack number for Travon Walker assuming he starts most of the year?
|
(08-06-2022, 06:48 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:(08-06-2022, 01:56 PM)RicoTx Wrote: Link? Any proof at all? As I assumed. Just pulling ‘facts’ out of thin air. You have no idea why he signed with Jacksonville. Kind of ironic you would talk about anybody having a little peanut. ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-06-2022, 09:02 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:(08-06-2022, 08:53 PM)Bullseye Wrote: When were Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne ever "marginally talented?" 1. Ketchman was long gone from Jacksonville by the time Manning was in Denver, IIRC. 2. He was spectacularly wrong about WRs being a dime a dozen then, like he was about many other things. 3. If you refer mostly to his Denver years, the overwhelming bulk of his career he had an abundance of supporting skill position talent. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
08-06-2022, 10:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:26 PM by mikesez. Edited 2 times in total.)
(08-06-2022, 08:53 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(08-06-2022, 08:29 PM)mikesez Wrote: Vic was saying that in the context of Brady and Manning constantly making marginally talented receivers into statistical superstars. There are dozens of receivers who could put up pro bowl numbers with the right QB throwing to them. Vic just took it too far. Vic was more talking about Dieon Branch and the other "stars" Brady had in NE before Moss came along. But yeah, statistically neither Wayne nor Harrison amounted to much without a Manning or a Luck throwing to them. They were still number one receivers, but their numbers were puny. So Vic drew a conclusion from that, maybe the wrong conclusion, but the numbers are what they are. Harrison's numbers were still pathetic in Manning's first year in 1998. Did Manning get better at the game between 98 in 99 or was it Harrison or both?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
08-07-2022, 03:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-07-2022, 03:46 AM by Bullseye. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-06-2022, 10:21 PM)mikesez Wrote:(08-06-2022, 08:53 PM)Bullseye Wrote: When were Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne ever "marginally talented?" Both Harrison and Wayne were first round picks. Sterling Sharpe, who was doing anaysis for ESPN at the time, said Harrison was the best receiver in that draft. As for Harrison's pre Manning numbers, he had 64 catches 836 yards and 8 TDs his rookie year, 73 catches, 866 yards and 6 TDs his 2nd year, and 59-776 and 7 TDs in 12 games his 3rd year. WHile those numbers were small compared to the rest of his career, those numbers would have him labeled as a future star here in Jacksonville. His rookie year numbers were very similar to Justin Blackmon's rookie season here and exceeded the rookie seasons of every ither Jaguars drafted WR in team history. His 2 seasons of pre Manning productivity and his first season under Manning (while Manning was a rookie) easily eclipses the 3 tear totals of every drafted Jaguars WR in team history. As for Reggie Wayne, he was drafted out of the University of miami-a school with a long history of producing talented WRs dating back to Eddie Brown in the 1980s. He played his first ten (10) seasons under with Manning at QB, and it took him about three years to develop into the receiver we largely know him to be. Manning was still Manning those three years and he wasn't overly productive. His first season played without Manning was 2011, and Wayne still caught 75 for 960 yards. When Andrew Luck came aboard in 2012, he had 106 catches for over 1300 yards and went to the Pro Bowl. It wasn't until 2013-his 13th year of football, that his numbers really fell off-which were his last two seasons in the league. Somehow penalizing Wayne for his production falling off in his 13th year of football doesn't make much sense, especially after he had 6 Pro bowl seasons. Granted having a great QB like Manning can make a good QR very good or even great. But to suggest their production was solely the result of manning and not their own individual skills/ability is disingenuous. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
Hurns came here because of his relationship with Jedd Fisch and his familiarity with that offense was why he produced immediately. Like so many others, once other teams had film on him then his productivity declined to just being a possession guy. Having terrible QB play certainly didn't help, but Hurns was really just an average guy anyway; lots of heart but just average talent.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-07-2022, 09:43 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Hurns came here because of his relationship with Jedd Fisch and his familiarity with that offense was why he produced immediately. Like so many others, once other teams had film on him then his productivity declined to just being a possession guy. Having terrible QB play certainly didn't help, but Hurns was really just an average guy anyway; lots of heart but just average talent. I have it on good authority that your wrong. He could of went anywhere. ![]() (08-07-2022, 09:43 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Hurns came here because of his relationship with Jedd Fisch and his familiarity with that offense was why he produced immediately. Like so many others, once other teams had film on him then his productivity declined to just being a possession guy. Having terrible QB play certainly didn't help, but Hurns was really just an average guy anyway; lots of heart but just average talent. (Emphasis added) No matter how you slice it, Hurns still managed to out produce Jaguars WRs drafted in the first round-and most in the 2nd round. If he were average at best who benefitted from familiarity with Fisch's system, he shouldn't have been more productive than guys drafted at the top of the draft. It shouldn't even be a contest. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
08-07-2022, 11:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-07-2022, 11:44 AM by jagsfan06. Edited 1 time in total.)
Just watched the Sam Mills football life and caught myself dreaming about Joh Allen, Travon Walker, Foyesade Oluokun and Devin Lloyd developing into Duval’s own version of the dome patrol lbs corps.
Respect the game. Play with a sense of urgency.
1.) Take care of the ball. Win the turnover battle. 2.) It's all about 3rd down. Win on 3rd down to win the game. 3.) Playmakers make plays. The only reason that you put your uniform on is to make plays. In order to EARN your paycheck, you must make plays. Learn from the great collapse of 2023.
08-07-2022, 12:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-07-2022, 12:20 PM by jaguarmvp. Edited 3 times in total.)
I liked what I saw from the first game. Walker showed power and even was drawing chips from the opposing line. A very small sample size but he looks good so far.
Look at the power he displays here. He is going against an NFL starer here and watch how he uses his power to push his blocker deep into the backfield. He then tosses the blocker off and makes the sack. You can't coach that. https://twitter.com/ClutchPointsApp/stat...kers-debut ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(08-06-2022, 06:21 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(08-06-2022, 03:27 PM)TheDuke007 Wrote: I'm not going to quote because it has gotten so long but will weigh in on the Caldwell/Baalke wide receiver conversation. Context is important. A Russian newspaper once reported that a Russian came in second in a race while the American came in second to last. It was factually correct. However, they failed to mention that it was a two person race. Context is important. You criticize Baalke for failing to draft a stud wide receiver but fail to mention that he hasn't used a Day 1 or Day 2 draft pick on wide receiver in over a decade and that was the one and only one time he had ever done so. With that one single exception, his inability to draft a stud wide receiver is a matter of not making a serious effort to do so instead of him trying and failing. Context is important. As for Caldwell, you said that there was no reason to believe the Jaguars could do better at drafting a wide receiver than if Caldwell did it. I don't believe in voodoo Jaguar curses and therefore the record of Coughlin/Harris/Smith is irrelevant. If Caldwell sucked slightly less than them at drafting wide receivers, it doesn't mean we have to accept that as the best that we can ever do. Caldwell's record at wide receiver is mixed at best. It's not unreasonable to expect the Jaguars going forward to do better than Caldwell. That was the original argument.
(08-06-2022, 06:21 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(08-06-2022, 03:27 PM)TheDuke007 Wrote: I'm not going to quote because it has gotten so long but will weigh in on the Caldwell/Baalke wide receiver conversation. Context is important. A Russian newspaper once reported that a Russian came in second in a race while the American came in second to last. It was factually correct. However, they failed to mention that it was a two person race. Context is important. You criticize Baalke for failing to draft a stud wide receiver but fail to mention that he hasn't used a Day 1 or Day 2 draft pick on wide receiver in over a decade and that was the one and only one time he had ever done so. With that one single exception, his inability to draft a stud wide receiver is a matter of not making a serious effort to do so instead of him trying and failing. Context is important. As for Caldwell, you said that there was no reason to believe the Jaguars could do better at drafting a wide receiver than if Caldwell did it. I don't believe in voodoo Jaguar curses and therefore the record of Coughlin/Harris/Smith is irrelevant. If Caldwell sucked slightly less than them at drafting wide receivers, it doesn't mean we have to accept that as the best that we can ever do. Caldwell's record at wide receiver is mixed at best. It's not unreasonable to expect the Jaguars going forward to do better than Caldwell. That was the original argument. (08-06-2022, 07:01 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: 3. I wanted of like a WR as well until I seen how the board fell. I'd take Lloyd in that trade over any WR at 33. Sorry to bring this up from so long ago, but I was on vacation. Seeing how many of us really liked guys like Pickens and Skyy Moore and considering how spectacular they are looking, you would really have Lloyd over Pickens and then what we could have gotten with the early 4th? Especially considering we wound up with Muma? Pickens, Muma, and Zach Tom (who is also getting rave reviews from the Packers beat) would give us a better team than Lloyd and Muma IMO. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-14-2022, 09:57 PM)Upper Wrote:You already know the answer to your question.(08-06-2022, 07:01 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: 3. I wanted of like a WR as well until I seen how the board fell. I'd take Lloyd in that trade over any WR at 33.
"Caldwell's draft picks of Robinson, Lee, Westbrook, Hurns and Chark are by far superior to any other WRs drafted by any other GMs in team history."
That's an awfully low bar to set. All Baakle has to do is draft 1 decent WR, and that will make them even.
"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies." - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption
08-15-2022, 01:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-15-2022, 02:02 AM by Eric1. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-14-2022, 09:57 PM)Upper Wrote:(08-06-2022, 07:01 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: 3. I wanted of like a WR as well until I seen how the board fell. I'd take Lloyd in that trade over any WR at 33. You should just book mark this and re-up the post in 2+ years when the question should actually be asked, so it can actually be answered. Playing hindsight/what if games after 2 months of practice and 1 preseason game has always been and will always be dumb my dude.
I believe Sacksonville will return. However, I see Travon Walker with maybe 5.5 sacks. I feel he will have far more QB pressures.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(08-06-2022, 09:17 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(08-06-2022, 09:02 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: I think he mean Stokes, Clark, our old TE from Den etc. I used to argue with Vic about Favre. He said Brett looked old and cold. I sent him a message that he used in his daily Ask Vic that said Favre had plenty of football left. He disagreed. Favre went on to take the Vikings to the playoffs and turned Sidney Rice into a star WR. I do agree that WRs are a dime a dozen but I also think there are super star WRs like Hopkins, Megatron, Jimmy Smith, etc. If your not a stud WR, you fall into the dime a dozen category.
09-27-2022, 09:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2022, 10:05 AM by flgatorsandjags. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-14-2022, 09:57 PM)Upper Wrote:(08-06-2022, 07:01 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: 3. I wanted of like a WR as well until I seen how the board fell. I'd take Lloyd in that trade over any WR at 33. (08-14-2022, 10:22 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:Yes I would to answer the question. Yall still wouldnt?(08-14-2022, 09:57 PM)Upper Wrote: Sorry to bring this up from so long ago, but I was on vacation. Seeing how many of us really liked guys like Pickens and Skyy Moore and considering how spectacular they are looking, you would really have Lloyd over Pickens and then what we could have gotten with the early 4th? Especially considering we wound up with Muma?You already know the answer to your question. (09-27-2022, 09:59 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:Don't do this.(08-14-2022, 09:57 PM)Upper Wrote: Sorry to bring this up from so long ago, but I was on vacation. Seeing how many of us really liked guys like Pickens and Skyy Moore and considering how spectacular they are looking, you would really have Lloyd over Pickens and then what we could have gotten with the early 4th? Especially considering we wound up with Muma? You're trying to claim victory 3 weeks into all these players careers. It's why you never answered the question initially and then went back to find a thread where the last post was 8/15 lol Pickens and Trevor would be incredible together. I'm happy the Jags have Lloyd because he's playing really well but I also think Pickens would be a serious X-factor on this team. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.