The NYT has already provided the proof.  Jan 20 story sez Trump wiretap info shared with White House. 

 

Shared with, not ordered to obtain by.

---

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley


 

If Trump goes after this it could go a long way for his administration.

---

If Trump goes after this it could go a long way for his administration.

Can't wait!

---

If Trump goes after this it could go a long way for his administration.

I double dare him

---

The fact is, Trump could order the CIA and the FBI to publicly tell what they know about this allegation, and he could declassify any FISA warrant that gave the government the right to tap his phones.   He doesn't need a congressional investigation. 

 

The fact that he hasn't done this speaks volumes. 

---

I double dare him

I'd say he's weighing up the pros and cons of doing it. Could see him going full tilt with the "ending corruption in government" angle and making it a story for months.

---

I'd say he's weighing up the pros and cons of doing it. Could see him going full tilt with the "ending corruption in government" angle and making it a story for months.

There's only two options.


Either he made this up or he is actually in big trouble.


There is no other story

---

There's only two options.


Either he made this up or he is actually in big trouble.


There is no other story

That's not how it works though. The actual truth isn't really important at all. What better way to solidify his administration than to paint a picture that the last one was so corrupt that they wiretapped a presidential candidate.


It might be completely false, it might be true. Either way its a good story to run with if you are Trump.

---

This may be one case where Trump's standard deflection method backfires on him.

---

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley


 

That's not how it works though. The actual truth isn't really important at all. What better way to solidify his administration than to paint a picture that the last one was so corrupt that they wiretapped a presidential candidate.


It might be completely false, it might be true. Either way its a good story to run with if you are Trump.

Of course it's true. The evidence is available right there in public records.

 

(Waits for some jack booted admin to remove this post for being inappropriate)

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 

Of course it's true. The evidence is available right there in public records.

 

(Waits for some jack booted admin to remove this post for being inappropriate)

You should really have those hallucinations checked out. Could be from something serious.

---

Of course it's true. The evidence is available right there in public records.


(Waits for some jack booted admin to remove this post for being inappropriate)

You legit might be a crazy person.

---

Of course it's true. The evidence is available right there in public records.


(Waits for some jack booted admin to remove this post for being inappropriate)

Haven't seen that at all, as good of a story it is.

---

Haven't seen that at all, as good of a story it is.

You're a good person.

 

(Waits for some jack booted admin to remove post for being inappropriate to some snowflake)

---

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/13/politics/s...retapping/


Now they are claiming he didn't really mean it


Hahaha


this guy is such a complete joke

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/13/politics/sean-spicer-donald-trump-wiretapping/'>http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/13/politics/sean-spicer-donald-trump-wiretapping/</a>


Now they are claiming he didn't really mean it


Hahaha


this guy is such a complete joke

True comedy

---

I don't know what they pay Sean Spicer, but it's probably not enough, lol.

 

Every day it seems he has to come out before the press and try to explain what Donald really meant to say.

 

It's getting a little Orwellian. I guess wiretapping doesn't mean wiretapping. Who knew?

 

Tomorrow's explanation: health care.

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

I don't know what they pay Sean Spicer, but it's probably not enough, lol.

 

Every day it seems he has to come out before the press and try to explain what Donald really meant to say.

 

It's getting a little Orwellian. I guess wiretapping doesn't mean wiretapping. Who knew?

 

Tomorrow's explanation: health care.

 

lol I thought about this the other day, the amount of mental gymnastics he has to do daily, I bet before he walks out he thinks "I don't get paid enough for this [BAD WORD REMOVED]" .

---

So Spicer is having to say that Trump didn't imply tapped phones when the Prez clearly said "tapped phones"?

 

---

So now, how are all the people who defended Trump on this issue going to get back off the limb that he put them out on? 

 

I would think that some people would learn, maybe it's better to wait a few days before doing the knee-jerk defense of everything he tweets. 

---