The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Worst Teams Tracker
|
Quote:No I didn't. Read what I replied that too. Like us, the Buccaneers have the entire NFC West. So you can say the same thing about the 49ers, Cardinals, and Rams. Because the NFC South plays agianst the AFC East, it is also important to remember both teams have games against the Bills. I fixed your post. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Like us, the Buccaneers have the entire NFC West. So you can say the same thing about the 49ers, Cardinals, and Rams. I know. But the poster before didn't mention the other teams..he mentioned the Seahawks. Hence why I did.
Well, not like one day will reveal the rest of the season but, the texans look like they are getting things back together. The browns aren't as bad as most thought they would be. The bills gave the chiefs a run for their money. I can easily see 0-16 for the jags if they continue to play like they are. The bucs... I'm a little let down they didn't hold on to the lead at the Seahawks. At least that shows signs they may pull off a win of two. Hopefully the Vikings can pull off another as well.
If you count all future opponents, I believe the Buccaneers currently have a slightly stronger (VERY slightly) SOS than we do. \
Here's who to root for to benefit the Jags sos being weaker next week: Washington Redskins @ Minnesota Vikings Philadelphia Eagles @ Green Bay Packers Buffalo Bills @ Pittsburgh Steelers Oakland Raiders @ New York Giants St. Louis Rams @ Indianapolis Colts Seattle Seahawks @ Atlanta Falcons <b>Cininnati Bengals </b>@ Baltimore Ravens Detroit Lions @ Chicago Bears Carolina Panthers @ San Francisco 49ers Houston Texans @ Arizona Cardinals Denver Broncos @ San Diego Chargers Dallas Cowboys @ New Orleans Saints Miami Dolphins @ Tampa Bay Buccaneers Not looking like a great week for us.
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
Quote:If you count all future opponents, I believe the Buccaneers currently have a slightly stronger (VERY slightly) SOS than we do. \ Hey Eleventh, I like these posts, :thanks: and keep up the good work. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:If you count all future opponents, I believe the Buccaneers currently have a slightly stronger (VERY slightly) SOS than we do. \ My odds added.
Quote:If you count all future opponents, I believe the Buccaneers currently have a slightly stronger (VERY slightly) SOS than we do. I did not count the future opponents because by the time the regular season is over, each team's SOS will be different. To be consistent, I had to stop at Week 9.
Quote:My odds added. How did you figure that out? I bet 10 people would give ED 10 different probabilities.
Quote:How did you figure that out? I bet 10 people would give ED 10 different probabilities. My eye test from season happenings thus far and pure specalation. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:My eye test from season happenings thus far and pure specalation. If Rodgers doesn't play push eagles up to like 60%.
Glennon looks like he's actually been playing decent so maybe they go for clowney over teddy anyways?
Quote:If Rodgers doesn't play push Eagles up to like 60%. Hey, the Bears are better with Josh McCown than the Eagles with Nick Foles. Seneca Wallace was thrown into the fire with no practice like Chad Henne was at Oakland in 2012. I think the Packers will look better next week than they were last night. That said, I still don't think Wallace is a good quarterback. Quote:Glennon looks like he's actually been playing decent so maybe they go for Clowney over Teddy anyway? Carolina's defense says hi. Also, it was Glennon's fault that Tampa Bay lost in Seattle. BTW I updated Minnesota's SOS. It is now 33-33 because both the Bears and Packers are 5-3.
Quote:Glennon looks like he's actually been playing decent so maybe they go for clowney over teddy anyways? I thought Glennon has always looked decent. He is one hit from being broken in half, but he isn't horrible. 89 times better than anybody on this roster. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:If Rodgers doesn't play push eagles up to like 60%. I am not suggesting Bridgewater is Aaron Rodgers, but last night shows the difference between a mediocre team with with an elite QB and a mediocre team with a mediocre QB. Jags 9-7 next year.
Quote:I am not suggesting Bridgewater is Aaron Rodgers, but last night shows the difference between a mediocre team with with an elite QB and a mediocre team with a mediocre QB. No it doesn't. The Packers are better than you think. Clay Matthews is out. Jermichazel Finley is out. Randall Cobb is on IR/DTR. Show me how Green Bay is not playoff-worthy with those guys.
Quote:Hey, the Bears are better with Josh McCown than the Eagles with Nick Foles. Seneca Wallace was thrown into the fire with no practice like Chad Henne was at Oakland in 2012. I think the Packers will look better next week than they were last night. That said, I still don't think Wallace is a good quarterback. The bears have a lot more all round then the packers do aswel as brandon Marshall who will catch even McCowns catches. Green Bay have no WR of Marshall's capabilities. If Rodgers is out then i would back eagles. And no It wasn't glennons fault a combination of bad play calling and terrible defense..but yes the offense just stopped after 21 points..hardly solely glennons fault.
Quote:No it doesn't. The Packers are better than you think. Clay Matthews is out. Jermichazel Finley is out. Randall Cobb is on IR/DTR. Show me how Green Bay is not playoff-worthy with those guys. Disagree. They had 1 sack last night against a backup QB and it was a coverage sack, and basically zero pressure. I know this because they were my fantasy defense and almost lost me a game! If GB plays an entire season with Senaca Wallace and everybody else healthy, they win 3 games at the most. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:The bears have a lot more all round then the packers do aswel as brandon Marshall who will catch even McCowns catches. Yes, Green Bay does have a wide receiver of Marshall's capabilities. In fact, he played last night. Seneca Wallace was mostly a handoff machine, so Jordy Nelson did not have as many chances to catch the ball last night as he does with Aaron Rodgers.
Quote:Yes, Green Bay does have a wide receiver of Marshall's capabilities. In fact, he played last night. Seneca Wallace was mostly a handoff machine, so Jordy Nelson did not have as many chances to catch the ball last night as he does with Aaron Rodgers. Jordy Nelson has no where near the capabilities of Brandon Marshall.
You ask me who I pick Marshall or Nelson..I pick Marshall 100/100 with not even a seconds thought.
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.