The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Bortles Under Marrone: 63% comp, NO INTS in 98 att.
|
(09-15-2017, 01:14 PM)SDM Wrote:(09-15-2017, 11:38 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: The running game is why he only attempted 21 passes. He also suffered 4 drops from receivers and a TE in that game. Two of them for what should have been big gains. But of course - every QB suffers drops.Not so much the lack of attempts I was talking about so much as the 52% completion percentage. That's all well and good when you're in control all game long thanks to your defense and run game. I'll be interested to see how he does when one or both of those units are struggling and he has to put the game on his shoulders. The problem with this line of thinking is that you are assuming qbs are supposed to be able to put the team on their back. Unless they are Brady or Rodgers, every other qb is practically incapable of doing that. As a fan of just football this is something I'm realizing. To win games you have to do multiple things well not just have a good qb. Getting a solid qb is hard enough and that is not good enough to win. Even a good qb need some other good aspects of a team to be successful. It takes a truly elite generational qb to overcomes major deficiencies on a football team. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (09-15-2017, 01:34 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: The problem with this line of thinking is that you are assuming qbs are supposed to be able to put the team on their back. Unless they are Brady or Rodgers, every other qb is practically incapable of doing that. As a fan of just football this is something I'm realizing. To win games you have to do multiple things well not just have a good qb. Getting a solid qb is hard enough and that is not good enough to win. Even a good qb need some other good aspects of a team to be successful. It takes a truly elite generational qb to overcomes major deficiencies on a football team.I see where you're coming from. But there are going to be times throughout a season where every QB is asked to go out there and win it for their team. Even non-elite QBs are capable of doing it from time to time. Are you confident Bortles can? Not saying he can't, just asking a legitimate question. Say your defense is amazing. Say LF is the second coming of Jim Brown. Say you guys do make the playoffs. You're going to be facing the best of the best when it comes to that point. Your defense could get matched up with the #1 offense. Your run game could get matched up with the #1 stop defense. Those are the times Bortles is going to prove he's worthy of being your starter. Even the best units have bad days. Good teams find a way to overcome and win anyway. Occasionally a team can "hide their QB" and make a deep playoff run. But it's not the norm.
(09-15-2017, 01:50 PM)SDM Wrote:(09-15-2017, 01:34 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: The problem with this line of thinking is that you are assuming qbs are supposed to be able to put the team on their back. Unless they are Brady or Rodgers, every other qb is practically incapable of doing that. As a fan of just football this is something I'm realizing. To win games you have to do multiple things well not just have a good qb. Getting a solid qb is hard enough and that is not good enough to win. Even a good qb need some other good aspects of a team to be successful. It takes a truly elite generational qb to overcomes major deficiencies on a football team.I see where you're coming from. But there are going to be times throughout a season where every QB is asked to go out there and win it for their team. Even non-elite QBs are capable of doing it from time to time. Are you confident Bortles can? Not saying he can't, just asking a legitimate question. Again just going off of how football works, if he can rely on a running game and defense but has to make plays on his own then yes I do believe he can. The issue the past few years he couldn't even get a three yard run out of the backs we had. The only way the ball moved was if he threw it. No qb will excel in that environment. And defenses that were stopping our run were not even stacking the box. Now if he plays against a team who is taking the run away because they focused on it, then yes I do believe he can make plays in that position. Blake is not this horrible qb the media makes him out to be. He is capable with a team and coach around him. (09-15-2017, 09:30 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: http://www.espn.com/blog/jacksonville-ja...terception You just had to go and jinx it, didn't ya? ![]()
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans.
Once we put the adults in charge, things sure changed in a hurry. Let's hope they stay changed.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
21 pass attempts Vs. 39 rushing attempts. It's pretty straight forward philosophy wise. Let your defense and running game win games and just let your QB manage the game. I don't have a problem with this approach as long as we're winning games.
The tacks struggled on the ground last week. And they really got away from their identity. In contrast, Mariota had 41 attempts Vs. 21 rushing attempts. And by looking at the box score they didn't really have to abandon the ground game like they did. Going into the final quarter last week they were only down by three points when it was 16 - 13. Mularkey might start showing his ineptitude this year as a coach. I think Marrone and Hackett will gameplan better against Mularkey in tomorrow's contest. And I think they'll stand strong by their philosophy as long as the game is manageable and within a one score possession. ![]() "What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king." We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(09-16-2017, 09:34 AM)HolsterHusto Wrote:(09-15-2017, 10:21 AM)The Hammer Wrote: So when Marrone was the OC and Bortles sucked was Marrone still good for him? Give him a break. He's a tacks fan. He can't be expected to keep up with the NFL when he's busy "pleasing" his sister-wife. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" (09-16-2017, 09:19 AM)Caldrac Wrote: The tacks struggled on the ground last week. And they really got away from their identity. In contrast, Mariota had 41 attempts Vs. 21 rushing attempts. And by looking at the box score they didn't really have to abandon the ground game like they did. Going into the final quarter last week they were only down by three points when it was 16 - 13.Honestly, I think we panicked. The run game was getting stuffed early on and it became apparent that OAK was going to pretty much move the ball at will. Something we've been discussing on our forum is that Murray ran against more stacked boxes last year than any other RB. And our OC has publicly stated that "we're just going to run right at the loaded boxes". We need to utilize the play action more as well as get Walker involved earlier on in this matchup. When we open up the offense Mariota generally tends to thrive (granted it didn't work out last week, but it happens). It still feels like they don't trust him as much as they should. They say he's our franchise QB, but they don't act like it. Quote:Mularkey might start showing his ineptitude this year as a coach.Start showing? Yeaaaah, we all already know the dude sucks. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Bortles had a great day. So far he is 20-34, 223 YDS, 1 TD, 2 INT
Better than Marriota.
Having Bortles as the starting QB is like handing Marrone the keys to a Honda Civic, patting him on the butt and telling him to go win the Daytona 500!
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.