if we took Jake Matthews at #3? Not gonna lie. I'd be disappointed for sure.

---

I wouldn't worry about that...

---

Stupid question.

---

Stupid question.

 

Why is that a stupid question?  There is a possibility he could slip to us, and if we did take him people would freak out.

---

I would be upset

---

With Joeckel on one side and Matthews on other, the offense will take off because Gabbert or Henne should flourish with all the time in the pocket, 4,000+ passing yards, 35+ TD's, 65 % completion. 

---

_{we don't have enough moderators if this happens.}

---

<!-- isHtml:1 --><!-- isHtml:1 -->;

;

Did the board crash when the Jaguars unexpectedly took Tyson Alualu with pick # 10 in 2010?   

 

While I currently don't expect the Jaguars to draft an Offensive Lineman with pick # 3 this year,   even if they did draft Matthews,  it wouldn't be more surprising than the Alualu pick in 2010.

---

Stupid question.

Haha haha coming from you? Hahahaha

---

With Joeckel on one side and Matthews on other, the offense will take off because Gabbert or Henne should flourish with all the time in the pocket, 4,000+ passing yards, 35+ TD's, 65 % completion. 

 

Brunell couldn't throw for more than 20 touchdowns with Leon Searcy and Tony Boselli at tackle. That was with Thunder and Lightning at Wide Receiver.  So yeah... no.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

I guess it's possible if Houston took a QB, and then another team trades up and grabs a QB, and we don't believe in whichever QB is there (or plan on taking a later one).  I'd think we would take Clowney in that instance, but who knows.  I guess I wouldn't be pissed, it would just be kind of a "meh whatever" pick.

---

part of me thinks if the jaguars take another position if teddy is still there that I would lose respect for my beloved team.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Stupid question.

Awesome!

---

Can you explain to me a scenario where we'd do this?

 

 

Luke Joeckel struggled hard at RT, he's not going to go back.. Paztor has played well.. so if we take Matthews we're essentially giving up on Joeckel.. 

 

 

Not happening. 

---

If we dont go QB or pass rusher we would go Watkins before Matthews.

---

If we dont go QB or pass rusher we would go Watkins before Matthews.

Watkins + Cecil on the outside, Blackmon in the slot

 

 

Dear god lol. 

---

Watkins + Cecil on the outside, Blackmon in the slot

 

 

Dear god lol. 

Yeah and throw in Ace and if we drafted one of the top RB's in the draft also.  With a half way decent QB our offense would be sick.

---

Aaron Murray I think could at the very least be a top half QB in the league with those weapons especially after the last few years what he had to work with at Georgia.

---

Stupid question.

Straight from the expert....

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 

JW has been on quite the mean streak lately.

---