He has a much better chance of being A-Rod and Clowney being Reggie White...

 

You know why??

 

He is more willing to get under the microscope and perfect his craft.

 

No half-a**ness around here, Bradley is not playing those games

 

Clowney gave enough enough trouble to Spurrier don't need that here

Not mature enough to admit you stuck your foot in your mouth and posted things that were not factual despite stating them as a fact? And how do you know Teddy is more willing to get under the microscope and perfect his craft?

---

http://www.gplus.to/WilliamSmith

Not mature enough to admit you stuck your foot in your mouth and posted things that were not factual despite stating them as a fact? And how do you know Teddy is more willing to get under the microscope and perfect his craft?

If this came out of your mouth, there is nothing to see here, carry on.

---

If this came out of your mouth, there is nothing to see here, carry on.

You have proven my point. Thank you for the falsities you have provided in this thread and the inability to admit when wrong. 

---

http://www.gplus.to/WilliamSmith

You have proven my point. Thank you for the falsities you have provided in this thread and the inability to admit when wrong. 

Clearly you have not been paying attention to the college season

 

but once again, carry on sir. 

 

Whenever your coach is wondering whether or not you are really hurt and there are persistent rumors about your work ethos, there is an issue.

 

But I guess to you, those are all non factors despite many ubertalented players have been busts just because of that very same work ethic/laziness issue 

---

You have proven my point. Thank you for the falsities you have provided in this thread and the inability to admit when wrong. 

I guess being a film junkie and a true student of the game doesn't matter to you

 

Just 40 times and bench reps, gotcha chief

---

I guess being a film junkie and a true student of the game doesn't matter to you

 

Just 40 times and bench reps, gotcha chief

Wrong on both accounts. This information likely comes from the same source as your other claims throughout these forums, like when you wrote that Teddy is the only QB with a first round grade on our big board. You make stuff up. I don't care what Clowney gets on his 40, and I think his time will be slower than what people expect. Its easy to see him dominating at the next level. When I look at Teddy, I do not see that. Sorry that I have a different opinion than you, but don't make up facts like multiple rings, our big board, or claiming that production doesn't help win games. Those are ridiculous and outlandish claims, chief.

---

http://www.gplus.to/WilliamSmith

Wrong on both accounts. This information likely comes from the same source as your other claims throughout these forums, like when you wrote that Teddy is the only QB with a first round grade on our big board. You make stuff up. I don't care what Clowney gets on his 40, and I think his time will be slower than what people expect. Its easy to see him dominating at the next level. When I look at Teddy, I do not see that. Sorry that I have a different opinion than you, but don't make up facts like multiple rings, our big board, or claiming that production doesn't help win games. Those are ridiculous and outlandish claims, chief.

Hahaha Your denying something that is all over the sports world amigo 

 

Anybody who doubts big board claim can message Vino (who was ardently against Bridgewater)

 

He can back what I am saying hahahahahhahaha

---

Wrong on both accounts. This information likely comes from the same source as your other claims throughout these forums, like when you wrote that Teddy is the only QB with a first round grade on our big board. You make stuff up. I don't care what Clowney gets on his 40, and I think his time will be slower than what people expect. Its easy to see him dominating at the next level. When I look at Teddy, I do not see that. Sorry that I have a different opinion than you, but don't make up facts like multiple rings, our big board, or claiming that production doesn't help win games. Those are ridiculous and outlandish claims, chief.

ok chief??? Don't be scared of the facts, they don't bite

---

ok chief??? Don't be scared of the facts, they don't bite

You said that Rodgers won rings, with an S. That would mean he won more than one. Rodgers won 1. This means you are wrong. Fact, chief.

---

http://www.gplus.to/WilliamSmith

DE's Production does not win games, if it mattered the eagles would have won 2-3 superbowls during the 80s


Rodger's production won rings...


A great team is a lot harder to assemble than finding a great qb

So DEs don't win games and Rodgers won multiple rings according to you

---

http://www.gplus.to/WilliamSmith

You said that Rodgers won rings, with an S. That would mean he won more than one. Rodgers won 1. This means you are wrong. Fact, chief.

All those qbs you just mentioned were considered "great" qbs when they won their rings...

 

Thats what I said, I misspoke, it doesn't take away my point though

---

So DEs don't win games and Rodgers won multiple rings according to you

if DEs won games why did the Texans go 2-14???

---

Honestly, if we have our choice of Clowney and Bridgewater, that's freaking heaven for this team.  I would walk away from the draft pretty satisfied regardless of which we chose, providing we can at least somewhat address the other need later in the draft.

 

I prefer Bridgewater at the spot, but there are some good QBs in the draft next year, too, and I could see us walkiing away with Mariota or Hundley, depending on how they do next year.

 

Either way, I feel like 3 is an excellent spot to sit in.

---

Honestly, if we have our choice of Clowney and Bridgewater, that's freaking heaven for this team.  

 

Yep. 

---

Honestly, if we have our choice of Clowney and Bridgewater, that's freaking heaven for this team. I would walk away from the draft pretty satisfied regardless of which we chose, providing we can at least somewhat address the other need later in the draft.


I prefer Bridgewater at the spot, but there are some good QBs in the draft next year, too, and I could see us walkiing away with Mariota or Hundley, depending on how they do next year.


Either way, I feel like 3 is an excellent spot to sit in.

To be fair, hundley and mariota likely wouldnt start right away


Honestly the two most overrated qbs in the past year, keeping bortles and manziel company

---

To be fair, hundley and mariota likely wouldnt start right away


Honestly the two most overrated qbs in the past year, keeping bortles and manziel company

 

While I agree, I don't exactly anticipate picking in the top 5 next year.  I was thinking we could grab one of them around 10 if we have to.

 

It's also contingent on their development.  They could look great after next year for all we know.

---

While I agree, I don't exactly anticipate picking in the top 5 next year. I was thinking we could grab one of them around 10 if we have to.


It's also contingent on their development. They could look great after next year for all we know.

I would have to be impressed, very dissapointed in both in certain games this pat year

---

In my opinion, you take Teddy if that scenario plays out.  That is if Dave has Teddy as his top rated QB.  That would be a perfect scenario to me.

---

Dave said he would not reach and he would take a quarterback if the right opportunity presents itself.

---

I would have to be impressed, very dissapointed in both in certain games this pat year

 

I agree.  They both need tons of development, but they have all the tools.

---