It's all coming out.

Those who side with the banana republic method of operation of some of these states will be judged firmly..

---

They just found a little under 10,000 votes that switched from Trump to Biden in 1 county in WI. That 19,000 vote swing makes it a toss up before all the other "glitches" are found and invalid votes thrown out.


These "glitches" were coded or the machines were connected to the internet. The logs are also not kept, so the trail is not there to audit. 100% manual recount needs to be done.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

I haven’t confirmed that. I think that was a hoax. The picture I saw looked like they picked Rock county and just photoshopped the picture by switching their names. Either way, I’m confident there have been more “glitches”. 

I also read that the rejection rate for ballots is 30 times smaller in some states than it was during the last election. All of these statistical anomalies can’t be coincidences.

The image was, the vote switch numbers I believe were confirmed.


Now that could mean there was a human error that was rightly corrected, but that isn't likely.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

I haven’t confirmed that. I think that was a hoax. The picture I saw looked like they picked Rock county and just photoshopped the picture by switching their names. Either way, I’m confident there have been more “glitches”. 

I also read that the rejection rate for ballots is 30 times smaller in some states than it was during the last election. All of these statistical anomalies can’t be coincidences.

The image was, the vote switch numbers I believe were confirmed.


Now that could mean there was a human error that was rightly corrected, but that isn't likely.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Confirmed by whom?  I'm just asking for a source other than yourself.

---

I would like to see a chart that tracks all the glitches and user errors that have occurred this election. I am certainly only hearing about the ones that favored Biden, but I would be curious if any favored Trump. It doesn't bother me to have an occasional user error or glitch, but I find it highly improbable that they all favor one candidate.

---

I would like to see a chart that tracks all the glitches and user errors that have occurred this election. I am certainly only hearing about the ones that favored Biden, but I would be curious if any favored Trump. It doesn't bother me to have an occasional user error or glitch, but I find it highly improbable that they all favor one candidate.

Yes, in all states as well.  Instead of distributing unemployment checks, we have a small group of those people in each state manually count ballots over the course of the next year and provide an exact analysis by Dec 31, 2021.

---

---

Drip,  drip, drip

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status...76737?s=19

The Gateway Pundit told you a flat-out lie.  

The story is completely false.  

https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/...entif.html

Lead Stories reached out to officials in Fulton County, Georgia, to ask about the allegation. They responded in a short statement, which read:

Fulton County is aware of allegations of 132,000 ballots being 'flagged.' These claims are simply false and baseless. Certain news organizations have circulated this information without contacting Fulton County for confirmation."

When asked specifically about the 132,000 purported "flags," a spokeswoman for the county said she was not aware of such a phenomenon. Jessica Corbitt said:

From what we can tell, the entire claim is false."

Georgia was a major battleground state in the 2020 presidential election. The secretary of state, who oversees statewide election data, is a Republican, Brad Raffensperger.
NewsGuard, a company that uses trained journalist to rank the reliability of websites, describes thegatewaypundit.com as:

A partisan conservative website that regularly publishes hoaxes, conspiracy theories, and unsubstantiated claims, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to NewsGuard the site does not maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability. Read their full assessment here.

Of-course they will say that. They haven't looked at any of it. I fully believe that is true because I know for a fact they haven't cleaned the voter rolls in a few years. I'm still listed as active in GA and I haven't voted there in 3-4 years, it appears I could have easily voted in GA if I wanted to commit a crime. It may not be 132,000, but I'm sure it is high.

Yeah,  you gotta watch Gateway Pundit. It's the most unreliable of the conservative sites. I hate that. They got me with one of the poll watchers changing votes. News needs to be verified, and I stop visiting sites when they lie.

Yeah they do post stuff quickly. The poll watchers were filling out ballots, I believe it was later claimed to be legal but we don't know if they changed the vote so that was only opinion. They are more like the MSM with posting what fits their beliefs.

---

The Gateway Pundit told you a flat-out lie.  

The story is completely false.  

https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/...entif.html

Lead Stories reached out to officials in Fulton County, Georgia, to ask about the allegation. They responded in a short statement, which read:

When asked specifically about the 132,000 purported "flags," a spokeswoman for the county said she was not aware of such a phenomenon. Jessica Corbitt said:
Georgia was a major battleground state in the 2020 presidential election. The secretary of state, who oversees statewide election data, is a Republican, Brad Raffensperger.
NewsGuard, a company that uses trained journalist to rank the reliability of websites, describes thegatewaypundit.com as:
According to NewsGuard the site does not maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability. Read their full assessment here.

Of-course they will say that. They haven't looked at any of it. I fully believe that is true because I know for a fact they haven't cleaned the voter rolls in a few years. I'm still listed as active in GA and I haven't voted there in 3-4 years, it appears I could have easily voted in GA if I wanted to commit a crime. It may not be 132,000, but I'm sure it is high.

Yeah,  you gotta watch Gateway Pundit. It's the most unreliable of the conservative sites. I hate that. They got me with one of the poll watchers changing votes. News needs to be verified, and I stop visiting sites when they lie.

Yeah they do post stuff quickly. The poll watchers were filling out ballots, I believe it was later claimed to be legal but we don't know if they changed the vote so that was only opinion. They are more like the MSM with posting what fits their beliefs.

If they haven't looked at any of it, then how could they have flagged them?  

Even the Gateway Pundit is backing away from the story now, blaming their source.  

You guys believe absolutely anything that makes you feel good.  You just grab it and run with it.  You never check it out.  

The story was a flat-out lie.  No one has flagged 132,000 ballots.

---

The Gateway Pundit told you a flat-out lie.  

The story is completely false.  

https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/...entif.html

Lead Stories reached out to officials in Fulton County, Georgia, to ask about the allegation. They responded in a short statement, which read:

When asked specifically about the 132,000 purported "flags," a spokeswoman for the county said she was not aware of such a phenomenon. Jessica Corbitt said:
Georgia was a major battleground state in the 2020 presidential election. The secretary of state, who oversees statewide election data, is a Republican, Brad Raffensperger.
NewsGuard, a company that uses trained journalist to rank the reliability of websites, describes thegatewaypundit.com as:
According to NewsGuard the site does not maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability. Read their full assessment here.

Of-course they will say that. They haven't looked at any of it. I fully believe that is true because I know for a fact they haven't cleaned the voter rolls in a few years. I'm still listed as active in GA and I haven't voted there in 3-4 years, it appears I could have easily voted in GA if I wanted to commit a crime. It may not be 132,000, but I'm sure it is high.

Yeah,  you gotta watch Gateway Pundit. It's the most unreliable of the conservative sites. I hate that. They got me with one of the poll watchers changing votes. News needs to be verified, and I stop visiting sites when they lie.

Yeah they do post stuff quickly. The poll watchers were filling out ballots, I believe it was later claimed to be legal but we don't know if they changed the vote so that was only opinion. They are more like the MSM with posting what fits their beliefs.

You should check to see if anyone has sent in an absentee ballot in your name. 

Those videos of people writing votes in could have been legal. They’re supposed to be cross-checking with the illegible ballots and filling in accordingly. I’ve seen some that are clearly looking at other ballots before filling them in and I’ve see some where they’re just filling them in without looking at anything.

---

Of-course they will say that. They haven't looked at any of it. I fully believe that is true because I know for a fact they haven't cleaned the voter rolls in a few years. I'm still listed as active in GA and I haven't voted there in 3-4 years, it appears I could have easily voted in GA if I wanted to commit a crime. It may not be 132,000, but I'm sure it is high.


Yeah they do post stuff quickly. The poll watchers were filling out ballots, I believe it was later claimed to be legal but we don't know if they changed the vote so that was only opinion. They are more like the MSM with posting what fits their beliefs.

If they haven't looked at any of it, then how could they have flagged them?  

Even the Gateway Pundit is backing away from the story now, blaming their source.  

You guys believe absolutely anything that makes you feel good.  You just grab it and run with it.  You never check it out.  

The story was a flat-out lie.  No one has flagged 132,000 ballots.

This is true in general in America. I blame the combination of social media, a morally bankrupt news media, and the public education system.

---

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

---

If they haven't looked at any of it, then how could they have flagged them?  

Even the Gateway Pundit is backing away from the story now, blaming their source.  

You guys believe absolutely anything that makes you feel good.  You just grab it and run with it.  You never check it out.  

The story was a flat-out lie.  No one has flagged 132,000 ballots.

This is true in general in America. I blame the combination of social media, a morally bankrupt news media, and the public education system.

There's no accountability.  People lie, and the lie is obvious, and proven, and they pay no price for that.  Trump is a perfect example.  No one cares.  People want to live in a fantasy world, and they refuse to see reality and it's hard to figure out why.

---

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

No.
They were too many early votes.  The announcement would have needed to come out ahead of early voting, or at least very early in that process, to change the outcome.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

Possible.  One little problem, though.  I'm sure Mike Pence would have said something like, 

"Because of President Trump's bold leadership with Operation Warp Speed, we have developed a vaccine in record time..."  

And Pfizer would have pointed out that they did not participate in Operation Warp Speed.

---

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

Holding off had the opposite effect of what the Comey did to Hillary 4 years ago.  I think Comey really turned the tide on the election and I also think the vaccine news would have won the election for Trump.

Trump would have stated that he put excessive pressure on Big Pharma and that's the reason we're all going to be able to proceed on with life as usually in 2021.  I can definitely see some swing votes reacting to that development.

---

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

Possible.  One little problem, though.  I'm sure Mike Pence would have said something like, 

"Because of President Trump's bold leadership with Operation Warp Speed, we have developed a vaccine in record time..."  

And Pfizer would have pointed out that they did not participate in Operation Warp Speed.

Which isn't entirely true, either.  They did not receive funding for vaccine development, they did receive almost $2b, however, for production and distribution of a vaccine when it's ready under Operation Warp Speed.

---

Possible.  One little problem, though.  I'm sure Mike Pence would have said something like, 

"Because of President Trump's bold leadership with Operation Warp Speed, we have developed a vaccine in record time..."  

And Pfizer would have pointed out that they did not participate in Operation Warp Speed.

Which isn't entirely true, either.  They did not receive funding for vaccine development, they did receive almost $2b, however, for production and distribution of a vaccine when it's ready under Operation Warp Speed.

Whether it's the truth or not hasn't stopped Trump and Pence from making statements in the past.

---

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

Meh... probably not but I think it's more indicative of their motives.

Had Pfizer, and Lillys been 10 days earlier, would it have changed the presidential outcome?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic...-drug.html

Possible.  One little problem, though.  I'm sure Mike Pence would have said something like, 

"Because of President Trump's bold leadership with Operation Warp Speed, we have developed a vaccine in record time..."  

And Pfizer would have pointed out that they did not participate in Operation Warp Speed.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/healt...speed.html

"On Monday, a spokeswoman for Pfizer clarified that the company is part of Operation Warp Speed as a supplier of a potential coronavirus vaccine."

---

Of-course they will say that. They haven't looked at any of it. I fully believe that is true because I know for a fact they haven't cleaned the voter rolls in a few years. I'm still listed as active in GA and I haven't voted there in 3-4 years, it appears I could have easily voted in GA if I wanted to commit a crime. It may not be 132,000, but I'm sure it is high.


Yeah they do post stuff quickly. The poll watchers were filling out ballots, I believe it was later claimed to be legal but we don't know if they changed the vote so that was only opinion. They are more like the MSM with posting what fits their beliefs.

You should check to see if anyone has sent in an absentee ballot in your name. 

Those videos of people writing votes in could have been legal. They’re supposed to be cross-checking with the illegible ballots and filling in accordingly. I’ve seen some that are clearly looking at other ballots before filling them in and I’ve see some where they’re just filling them in without looking at anything.

I don't have any information listed in absentee section, but who knows if someone filled out something. I should have an address flag since I don't have a license as everything was transferred to FL.

---

Which isn't entirely true, either.  They did not receive funding for vaccine development, they did receive almost $2b, however, for production and distribution of a vaccine when it's ready under Operation Warp Speed.

Whether it's the truth or not hasn't stopped Trump and Pence from making statements in the past.

I agree.

---

Whether it's the truth or not hasn't stopped Trump and Pence from making statements in the past.

To be fair, the same could be said for Biden, Obama and both of the Clintons.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.