Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez


(06-12-2021, 05:22 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: AOC's aunt says Trump is NOT to blame for lack of aid to the struggling island | Daily Mail Online

Guess who's not invited to Marxgiving Day turkey dinner..
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


(This post was last modified: 06-12-2021, 08:33 PM by mikesez.)

(06-08-2021, 09:06 PM)copycat Wrote:
(06-08-2021, 08:09 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I agree, which is why I object to the outdated conservative position that the government should not interfere in capitalism. It has to. Otherwise, crony capitalism will take its place. Conservatives really need to move away from the idea that all regulation is bad. I am also aware that corporations will manipulate regulation to their own end, so all regulation is not good, either. We really need new monopoly laws that focus on competition and anti-corruption.

Agreed.  I struggle where to draw the line though.  I believe the first step would be a constitutional amendment that ALL bills be single item issues.  No riders, no additional verbiage.  One item, one vote.  It would end lobbying as we know it and change cronyism.

The problem with the requirement like that, is it the only ones who can enforce it are judges. Even the simplest bills could become very complicated legal processes taking months if someone wants to dispute that the bill is really a two subject bill.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Hence, my response to copycat. The problem is that these bills are gargantuan, and they are delivered to congress the day that voting needs to take place. So, congressmen take their cues from the people funding them. It's a rigged game.
Reply


(06-12-2021, 08:32 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(06-08-2021, 09:06 PM)copycat Wrote: Agreed.  I struggle where to draw the line though.  I believe the first step would be a constitutional amendment that ALL bills be single item issues.  No riders, no additional verbiage.  One item, one vote.  It would end lobbying as we know it and change cronyism.

The problem with the requirement like that, is it the only ones who can enforce it are judges. Even the simplest bills could become very complicated legal processes taking months if someone wants to dispute that the bill is really a two subject bill.

So be it!  What we have now only benefits lobbyists, those they represent and of course the politicians.  Tie those self serving bills up in court if that is what it takes to put an end to crony capitalism we now have.  

As to my original point, how many of these riders would pass on an up or down vote as a single issue item?
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply


Who paid for AOC's 35K gala ticket?
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Thought her gown said “Ax the [BLEEP]” at first glance.
Reply


(09-15-2021, 08:15 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Thought her gown said “Ax the [BLEEP]” at first glance.

Ask them what?
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


"Tax the rich" is a catchy slogan, but it's a fact that we already tax the rich. The top 10% of all earners pay 71% of the income taxes in this country. If she's talking about the top 1%, the fact is, the top 1% pays 40% of the income taxes in this country. Tax the rich? We're already taxing the rich.
Reply


You don't get power by pointing out facts. You gain power through creating resentment.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(09-15-2021, 01:54 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: "Tax the rich" is a catchy slogan, but it's a fact that we already tax the rich.  The top 10% of all earners pay 71% of the income taxes in this country.  If she's talking about the top 1%, the fact is, the top 1% pays 40% of the income taxes in this country.  Tax the rich?  We're already taxing the rich.

Shhhhh. Can't have facts entering this conversation. I say tax no one and get it over with. Taxation is theft, especially income taxes.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSIM9bZmkezB9B4qD2qAtT...IGQHCZIPuA]
Reply


(09-15-2021, 08:44 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 08:15 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Thought her gown said “Ax the [BLEEP]” at first glance.

Ask them what?

Rhymes with Rich
Reply


(09-15-2021, 08:44 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 08:15 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Thought her gown said “Ax the [BLEEP]” at first glance.

Ask them what?

This is an underrated joke.
Reply


(09-15-2021, 07:31 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 08:44 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Ask them what?

This is an underrated joke.

Nope, much appreciated.  +1 to him
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week. Try the veal and don't forget to tip your moderators who work hard to keep you goofs in line.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


AOC's 'Tax the rich' dress designer owes tax debt in multiple states | Fox Business

...The company got into a deeper hole with the feds. Between April 2018 and April 2019, the Internal Revenue Service placed six federal liens on Cultural Brokerage Agency totaling $103,220. The liens specifically cite the company’s failure to remit employee payroll taxes.

The IRS declined to comment on their current status.

"Just because they take it out of your paycheck doesn’t mean they’re sending it to the government," David Cenedella, a Baruch College taxation lecturer explained after reviewing the liens...
Reply


Haha. You couldn't write this any better.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 09-19-2021, 08:50 AM by The Real Marty. Edited 2 times in total.)

AOC is the Sarah Palin of the left- a person whose self confidence far outweighs their intelligence.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(09-19-2021, 08:44 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: AOC is the Sarah Palin of the left- a person whose self confidence far outweighs their intelligence.

She's very good at snappy retorts. It doesn't hurt that she's supported by an abetting media and a brain damaged constituency.
Reply


(09-19-2021, 09:11 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(09-19-2021, 08:44 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: AOC is the Sarah Palin of the left- a person whose self confidence far outweighs their intelligence.

She's very good at snappy retorts. It doesn't hurt that she's supported by an abetting media and a brain damaged constituency.

I don't know that I agree with that.   I consume a lot of what you would probably call "mainstream media" or "leftwing media," for example the New York Times and the Washington Post, and all they do in regards to her is straight reporting.   "She said this" or "she did that."  I don't see them ever supporting her in any way.  In fact, the very negative opinion I have of her is based on information from those types of sources, so, in my opinion, what they are reporting is in no way "supportive."
Reply


(09-19-2021, 10:18 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(09-19-2021, 09:11 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: She's very good at snappy retorts. It doesn't hurt that she's supported by an abetting media and a brain damaged constituency.

I don't know that I agree with that.   I consume a lot of what you would probably call "mainstream media" or "leftwing media," for example the New York Times and the Washington Post, and all they do in regards to her is straight reporting.   "She said this" or "she did that."  I don't see them ever supporting her in any way.  In fact, the very negative opinion I have of her is based on information from those types of sources, so, in my opinion, what they are reporting is in no way "supportive."

I do not get the opportunity to read either of those because they're behind a pay wall, but AOC is the least of their bias problems. I do know broadcast media fawns over her, especially when she points her barbs towards Republicans. 

Has the NYT or WaPo mentioned anything about her dress designer?
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
12 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!