https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/stat...hQBWQ&s=19

---

---

---

---

True lol
https://twitter.com/WeedPorns/status/176...2HkBA&s=19

---

---

---

Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."

---

This should piss everyone off.. Except for the few ghouls on here.

---

---

---

Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."

This guy is having a historic meltdown kinda day.

And I've been here for it lol

---

This guy is having a historic meltdown kinda day.

And I've been here for it lol

The tears and pee stuff is funny, he really is having a mental breakdown. Wait until he hears about the upcoming decision on immunity. He doesn't get that Trump wins either way. If the president doesn't have immunity, Obama and Biden and probably others go to jail under Trump.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---

This guy is having a historic meltdown kinda day.

And I've been here for it lol

Mikesez can literally see his future.

---

The Colorado decision rested on a series of like five or six questions that all had to be answered yes. If any of them were no the decision turns. The question SCOTUS chose to focus on is if states have the power to enforce anything beyond the most obvious and clear cut qualifications for federal office. The answer to this used to be yes. But in 1995 the Supreme Court struck a major blow to the "states are laboratories of democracy" idea and said no.
In today's decision, the Court decided to uphold the 1995 U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton decision, which was wrongly decided.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

The Colorado decision rested on a series of like five or six questions that all had to be answered yes.  If any of them were no the decision turns. The question SCOTUS chose to focus on is if states have the power to enforce anything beyond the most obvious and clear cut qualifications for office. The answer to this used to be yes.  But in 1995 the Supreme Court struck a major blow to the "states are laboratories of democracy" idea and said no.
In today's decision, the Court decided to uphold the 1995 U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton decision, which was wrongly decided.

To summarize your ChatGPT prompt, Trump did nothing wrong and has never been convicted of anything.

---

The Colorado decision rested on a series of like five or six questions that all had to be answered yes.  If any of them were no the decision turns. The question SCOTUS chose to focus on is if states have the power to enforce anything beyond the most obvious and clear cut qualifications for office. The answer to this used to be yes.  But in 1995 the Supreme Court struck a major blow to the "states are laboratories of democracy" idea and said no.
In today's decision, the Court decided to uphold the 1995 U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton decision, which was wrongly decided.

To summarize your ChatGPT prompt, Trump did nothing wrong and has never been convicted of anything.

Everyone has done something wrong.

Anyhow, what's your opinion of U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

lololololol

---

There's a reason why..

---

If you know, you know lol

---

lololololol

Good gawd. The left has become totally unhinged.

---