Mike waiting for ChatGPT update.

Just imagine the backlash from that scum if the Trump camp was guilty of doing that lololol

Yeah, it's why you can't take people like that serious and make sure you take the time to laugh at them and publicly shame them.

---

"Vice president Kakula, how do you explain these headlines?"

"Explaiin the headlines you ask? Sure, headlines are words that are on the papers and things. They are usually done in a bigger print, they are almost always at the top too, most of the times the ink is black, like me,.. kakkle.kakkkle..kakkkkle. Sometimes people do not like what the headlines imply because they are stupid and stuff so they change them. See? that's all it is. I can't believe I have to explain these things to you. kakkle..kakkle. kakkle.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

D +10 lol

https://twitter.com/davidchapman141/stat...KyUqg&s=19

---

To not see the concerted effort by legacy media during election cycles is willful ignorance at this point. To not question the why behind it either implies approval of the ends justifying the means or useful idiot level intelligence.

---

To not see the concerted effort by legacy media during election cycles is willful ignorance at this point.  To not question the why behind it either implies approval of the ends justifying the means or useful idiot level intelligence.

Oh, everybody sees it. They simply do not care because it is anyone but Trump. No matter the means, ANYBODY but Trump. Your last four words above describe it perfectly.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

https://twitter.com/NoVA_Campaigns/statu...ozen-times

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

https://twitter.com/HerbieZiskend/status...-this.html

“She’s bringing out people who are not interested in voting for either Trump or Biden, so the entire electoral pool has changed and if it continues in this direction you have to start to consider Democrats winning the Senate and Democrats winning the House,” Luntz said Wednesday on CNBC.

“She’s got intensity now. She’s got an intensity advantage. She’s got a demographic advantage and I haven’t seen anything like this happen in 30 days in my lifetime,” he said. “Now my groups are broken up by young women saying, ‘I’m not voting for him anymore.’”


He added: “The people who are undecided have all collapsed towards Harris. The people who are ‘weak’ Trump have all collapsed towards undecided.”

---

https://twitter.com/HerbieZiskend/status...-this.html

“She’s bringing out people who are not interested in voting for either Trump or Biden, so the entire electoral pool has changed and if it continues in this direction you have to start to consider Democrats winning the Senate and Democrats winning the House,” Luntz said Wednesday on CNBC.

“She’s got intensity now. She’s got an intensity advantage. She’s got a demographic advantage and I haven’t seen anything like this happen in 30 days in my lifetime,” he said. “Now my groups are broken up by young women saying, ‘I’m not voting for him anymore.’”


He added: “The people who are undecided have all collapsed towards Harris. The people who are ‘weak’ Trump have all collapsed towards undecided.”

CNBC?  Seriously?

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

34 pages in and I have not seen anything other than "she's not Trump" as a reason to vote for Kamala.

Somebody explain this to me.

In the 2020 election she had to drop out of the primary very early because she had no support.

She was clearly a DEI hire when Biden first said that he would appoint a woman to be his running mate, then doubled-down on it when he said that it would be a "woman of color".  So the only reason she got the position was because of her gender a skin color.

In March of 2021 Biden assigned her the job of "border czar" though he never really officially used that title.  She obviously failed to complete the task.

Earlier in 2024 many were whispering that Biden should drop her from the ticket in the upcoming election.  It was possibly due to her failure on the border as well as the stupid "word salads" that she always comes up with.  Another fact is that she had a very high turnover as far as her staff.

Fairly recently the democrat brass forced Biden out of the race due to his clear cognitive decline and poor performance during the debate with Trump.  The democrat party then "anointed" or "coronated" Kamala to the top of the ticket, most likely because they didn't want to be labeled as kicking a "woman of color" aside with a real primary.

Since being appointed rather than elected to the top of the democrat position she has failed to be interviewed or answer any questions from the press.

So suddenly now we are supposed to believe that she is bringing so many people out to vote for her?  What exactly are her policy positions other than stealing the "no tax on tips" idea that Trump spoke of weeks ago?

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Here's another poll. This one shows Harris ahead by 5%. I'm sure these polls are going to bounce around some between now and the election.

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institu...us_081424/

---

34 pages in and I have not seen anything other than "she's not Trump" as a reason to vote for Kamala.

Somebody explain this to me.

In the 2020 election she had to drop out of the primary very early because she had no support.

She was clearly a DEI hire when Biden first said that he would appoint a woman to be his running mate, then doubled-down on it when he said that it would be a "woman of color".  So the only reason she got the position was because of her gender a skin color.

In March of 2021 Biden assigned her the job of "border czar" though he never really officially used that title.  She obviously failed to complete the task.

Earlier in 2024 many were whispering that Biden should drop her from the ticket in the upcoming election.  It was possibly due to her failure on the border as well as the stupid "word salads" that she always comes up with.  Another fact is that she had a very high turnover as far as her staff.

Fairly recently the democrat brass forced Biden out of the race due to his clear cognitive decline and poor performance during the debate with Trump.  The democrat party then "anointed" or "coronated" Kamala to the top of the ticket, most likely because they didn't want to be labeled as kicking a "woman of color" aside with a real primary.

Since being appointed rather than elected to the top of the democrat position she has failed to be interviewed or answer any questions from the press.

So suddenly now we are supposed to believe that she is bringing so many people out to vote for her?  What exactly are her policy positions other than stealing the "no tax on tips" idea that Trump spoke of weeks ago?

During the 2020 primaries, Democrats were spoiled with a large number of options and confident that any of them had a chance of beating Trump. They ultimately picked Biden based on a belief that he had the best chance.  

But today they are presented with only one choice. All of the enthusiasm is focused on Kamala.  

It doesn't have to make sense.  Voter enthusiasm is like investor enthusiasm, it's an animalistic reaction.  Bull and bear, etc.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

https://twitter.com/HerbieZiskend/status...-this.html

“She’s bringing out people who are not interested in voting for either Trump or Biden, so the entire electoral pool has changed and if it continues in this direction you have to start to consider Democrats winning the Senate and Democrats winning the House,” Luntz said Wednesday on CNBC.

“She’s got intensity now. She’s got an intensity advantage. She’s got a demographic advantage and I haven’t seen anything like this happen in 30 days in my lifetime,” he said. “Now my groups are broken up by young women saying, ‘I’m not voting for him anymore.’”


He added: “The people who are undecided have all collapsed towards Harris. The people who are ‘weak’ Trump have all collapsed towards undecided.”

CNBC?  Seriously?

Consider the source.. Stupid is as stupid does.

---

34 pages in and I have not seen anything other than "she's not Trump" as a reason to vote for Kamala.

Somebody explain this to me.

In the 2020 election she had to drop out of the primary very early because she had no support.

She was clearly a DEI hire when Biden first said that he would appoint a woman to be his running mate, then doubled-down on it when he said that it would be a "woman of color".  So the only reason she got the position was because of her gender a skin color.

In March of 2021 Biden assigned her the job of "border czar" though he never really officially used that title.  She obviously failed to complete the task.

Earlier in 2024 many were whispering that Biden should drop her from the ticket in the upcoming election.  It was possibly due to her failure on the border as well as the stupid "word salads" that she always comes up with.  Another fact is that she had a very high turnover as far as her staff.

Fairly recently the democrat brass forced Biden out of the race due to his clear cognitive decline and poor performance during the debate with Trump.  The democrat party then "anointed" or "coronated" Kamala to the top of the ticket, most likely because they didn't want to be labeled as kicking a "woman of color" aside with a real primary.

Since being appointed rather than elected to the top of the democrat position she has failed to be interviewed or answer any questions from the press.

So suddenly now we are supposed to believe that she is bringing so many people out to vote for her?  What exactly are her policy positions other than stealing the "no tax on tips" idea that Trump spoke of weeks ago?

During the 2020 primaries, Democrats were spoiled with a large number of options and confident that any of them had a chance of beating Trump. They ultimately picked Biden based on a belief that he had the best chance.  

But today they are presented with only one choice. All of the enthusiasm is focused on Kamala.  

It doesn't have to make sense.  Voter enthusiasm is like investor enthusiasm, it's an animalistic reaction.  Bull and bear, etc.

Everybody except for a few Trump fans and a few Biden fans desperately wanted someone new.  And younger.  More people dislike Trump than like him.  It's just that they were so depressed and discouraged about having to vote for Biden again.  There was absolutely no enthusiasm for Biden.  So here comes someone who is not Biden or Trump, and who is a generation younger, and you have the natural reaction, which is an emotional rebound from depression to elation.  How long it will last, no one knows.  But the Democrats are doing a great job of packaging her.  And Trump appears to be totally thrown off balance by the whole thing, which really should have been pretty predictable.

---

CNBC?  Seriously?

Consider the source.. Stupid is as stupid does.

The source was Republican pollster Frank Luntz.

---

During the 2020 primaries, Democrats were spoiled with a large number of options and confident that any of them had a chance of beating Trump. They ultimately picked Biden based on a belief that he had the best chance.  

But today they are presented with only one choice. All of the enthusiasm is focused on Kamala.  

It doesn't have to make sense.  Voter enthusiasm is like investor enthusiasm, it's an animalistic reaction.  Bull and bear, etc.

Everybody except for a few Trump fans and a few Biden fans desperately wanted someone new.  And younger.  More people dislike Trump than like him.  It's just that they were so depressed and discouraged about having to vote for Biden again.  There was absolutely no enthusiasm for Biden.  So here comes someone who is not Biden or Trump, and who is a generation younger, and you have the natural reaction, which is an emotional rebound from depression to elation.  How long it will last, no one knows.  But the Democrats are doing a great job of packaging her.  And Trump appears to be totally thrown off balance by the whole thing, which really should have been pretty predictable.

---

Consider the source.. Stupid is as stupid does.

The source was Republican pollster Frank Luntz.

You mean rino polls?

Yeah, you can keep em..

Make sure you snuggle up with those rino polls tonight.. They'll keep you safe!!

---

Why should message board posters try to sell Harris on anyone when the MSM gets paid to do it?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Here's another poll. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...794636007/

Kamala Harris is ahead or tied with Donald Trump in six of seven battleground states, according to a new survey released Wednesday, erasing the leads the former Republican president enjoyed before Joe Biden dropped out of the race last month.

The Cook Political Report survey, conducted by the Democratic polling firm BSG and Republican polling firm GS Strategy Group, found Harris leading Trump in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina and Arizona, and tied with Trump in Georgia. Nevada is the only battleground state that Trump still leads, the poll found.
=================================

Hey, I'm just telling you guys, if you think Trump's way ahead, you're wrong.

---

Here's another poll. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...794636007/

Kamala Harris is ahead or tied with Donald Trump in six of seven battleground states, according to a new survey released Wednesday, erasing the leads the former Republican president enjoyed before Joe Biden dropped out of the race last month.

The Cook Political Report survey, conducted by the Democratic polling firm BSG and Republican polling firm GS Strategy Group, found Harris leading Trump in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina and Arizona, and tied with Trump in Georgia. Nevada is the only battleground state that Trump still leads, the poll found.
=================================

Hey, I'm just telling you guys, if you think Trump's way ahead, you're wrong.

GS Strategy is owned by a guy who worked for McCain, Mark Kirk, Chris Christie, and Rick Perry. I'm sure there's nothing hinky about their analysis at all. Heck Marty, I'm surprised you and Mikesez weren't asked to join their staff.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Marty just keeps trotting right passed the plethora of evidence that he's being manipulated by the media to point out new data being presented by the media that's manipulating him.

---

Oh look, a poll that represents more than 50 people sampled lolol

https://x.com/PpollingNumbers/status/182...aN53A&s=19

This is a grass roots movement, and the legacy media can't stop it..

---

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-qBp6-A6...MDN6eXl3eg==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."