https://www.instagram.com/reel/C--MquMuj...YXJhYW1kaQ==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

---

There’s a few folks around who enthusiastically checked every item.

---

I'm good with being friends with all ends of the spectrum, regardless of political beliefs, but I think the above statements are too narrow.  For many Dems, it's not all about hating Trump but also hating the hard core base (like those involved in the Jan 6 insurrection).

---

I'm good with being friends with all ends of the spectrum, regardless of political beliefs, but I think the above statements are too narrow.  For many Dems, it's not all about hating Trump but also hating the hard core base (like those involved in the Jan 6 insurrection).

If you vote for Harris after the policies she has proposed, you are an idiot and should be shamed by your friends and family.

---

I'm good with being friends with all ends of the spectrum, regardless of political beliefs, but I think the above statements are too narrow.  For many Dems, it's not all about hating Trump but also hating the hard core base (like those involved in the Jan 6 insurrection).

On Jan 6 there was no insurrection. That is FAKE news. It was a riot a lot like what occurred when Trump was first elected or when Tim Waltz let his state burn. See excerpt below. A link to the article is below.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stop-callin...1641417543

These are important criminal charges that shouldn’t go unaddressed. But of the hundreds of “Capitol Breach Cases” listed at the Justice Department’s prosecution page, not one defendant is charged with insurrection under 18 U.S.C. 2383. That’s because insurrection is a legal term with specific elements. No prosecutor would dare mislabel negligent homicide or manslaughter a murder, because they are totally distinct crimes. The media has no legal or moral basis to do otherwise.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

LOL.  If the glove fits!


https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/...4137872716

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

LOL.  If the glove fits!


https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/...4137872716

Just admitting that they are Americas soft white underbelly that I have mentioned many times on this board. Buuuhwhahhhaaahaaa

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C--4wb8up...bHh1M2c5eg==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

I'm good with being friends with all ends of the spectrum, regardless of political beliefs, but I think the above statements are too narrow.  For many Dems, it's not all about hating Trump but also hating the hard core base (like those involved in the Jan 6 insurrection).

If you vote for Harris after the policies she has proposed, you are an idiot and should be shamed by your friends and family.

You seem to be a bit on edge lately.  Keep this handy.

National Mental Health Hotline | 866-903-3787

---

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C--5o2-Ph...l2dnJybXB1

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

I'm good with being friends with all ends of the spectrum, regardless of political beliefs, but I think the above statements are too narrow.  For many Dems, it's not all about hating Trump but also hating the hard core base (like those involved in the Jan 6 insurrection).

On Jan 6 there was no insurrection. That is FAKE news. It was a riot a lot like what occurred when Trump was first elected or when Tim Waltz let his state burn. See excerpt below. A link to the article is below.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stop-callin...1641417543

These are important criminal charges that shouldn’t go unaddressed. But of the hundreds of “Capitol Breach Cases” listed at the Justice Department’s prosecution page, not one defendant is charged with insurrection under 18 U.S.C. 2383. That’s because insurrection is a legal term with specific elements. No prosecutor would dare mislabel negligent homicide or manslaughter a murder, because they are totally distinct crimes. The media has no legal or moral basis to do otherwise.

You are being pedantic. 
The legal definition of insurrection is actually not as specific as you say, but even if I grant you that point, and say every prosecuting attorney in the country agrees that no one should be charged under that particular statute, that does not mean that pundits like you or I cannot use that word to describe what we saw that day.
We agree that what we saw was a riot.
Some riots are also insurrections.  To me, a riot is when the strength and bravery of the police and military are tested.  But an insurrection is when their loyalty is tested.  This is a very simple and intuitive definition.  Were the police and military going to be loyal to the constitution and all of the duly elected officers other than President Trump, or were they going to be loyal to Trump?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

On Jan 6 there was no insurrection. That is FAKE news. It was a riot a lot like what occurred when Trump was first elected or when Tim Waltz let his state burn. See excerpt below. A link to the article is below.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stop-callin...1641417543

These are important criminal charges that shouldn’t go unaddressed. But of the hundreds of “Capitol Breach Cases” listed at the Justice Department’s prosecution page, not one defendant is charged with insurrection under 18 U.S.C. 2383. That’s because insurrection is a legal term with specific elements. No prosecutor would dare mislabel negligent homicide or manslaughter a murder, because they are totally distinct crimes. The media has no legal or moral basis to do otherwise.

You are being pedantic. 
The definition of insurrection is actually not as specific as you say, but even if I grant you that point, and say every prosecuting attorney in the country agrees that no one should be charged under that particular statute, that does not mean that pundits like you or I cannot use that word to describe what we saw that day.
We agree that what we saw was a riot.
Some riots are also insurrections.  To me, a riot is when the strength and bravery of the police and military are tested.  But an insurrection is when their loyalty is tested.  This is a very simple and intuitive definition.  Were the police and military going to be loyal to the constitution and all of the duly elected officers other than President Trump, or were they going to be loyal to Trump?

No one was testing anyone's loyalty. Who is being pedantic now ... LOL  Nice, is my word of the day thanks! You can call it what you want. I call what was done after Trump was elected the same thing and more wide spread. What was funny was the people on the news wondering why it was taking so long to overturn Trump's election. Unfortunately it was the same thing but ok for some and seems not for others. Your bias is showing now...

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

You are being pedantic. 
The definition of insurrection is actually not as specific as you say, but even if I grant you that point, and say every prosecuting attorney in the country agrees that no one should be charged under that particular statute, that does not mean that pundits like you or I cannot use that word to describe what we saw that day.
We agree that what we saw was a riot.
Some riots are also insurrections.  To me, a riot is when the strength and bravery of the police and military are tested.  But an insurrection is when their loyalty is tested.  This is a very simple and intuitive definition.  Were the police and military going to be loyal to the constitution and all of the duly elected officers other than President Trump, or were they going to be loyal to Trump?

No one was testing anyone's loyalty. Who is being pedantic now ... LOL  Nice, is my word of the day thanks! You can call it what you want. I call what was done after Trump was elected the same thing and more wide spread. What was funny was the people on the news wondering why it was taking so long to overturn Trump's election. Unfortunately it was the same thing but ok for some and seems not for others. Your bias is showing now...

I don't think there was a riot involving thousands of people when Trump was elected or inaugurated.
Got a link?

There were a bunch of pundits speculating that the electoral college might be faithless and refuse to vote for Trump, then there was speculation that Congress or Pence might pull some strings to remove him from office before long.  All of those unlikely scenarios would have been nonviolent and legal.  No one was speculating about any violence or any coup.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

No one was testing anyone's loyalty. Who is being pedantic now ... LOL  Nice, is my word of the day thanks! You can call it what you want. I call what was done after Trump was elected the same thing and more wide spread. What was funny was the people on the news wondering why it was taking so long to overturn Trump's election. Unfortunately it was the same thing but ok for some and seems not for others. Your bias is showing now...

I don't think there was a riot involving thousands of people when Trump was elected or inaugurated.
Got a link?

There were a bunch of pundits speculating that the electoral college might be faithless and refuse to vote for Trump, then there was speculation that Congress or Pence might pull some strings to remove him from office before long.  All of those unlikely scenarios would have been nonviolent and legal.  No one was speculating about any violence or any coup.

LOL how soon we forget. Thousands of people blocking highways all over the country.  Yes, they were violent, had more than a few employees assaulted while just trying to get to their jobs. You can't be serious.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/thousand...d=43427653

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/us/tr...tests.html

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016...tests.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/1...n-violent/

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

And more , you know you should investigate a bit more before posting inaccurate stuff or appear to be a one-way street. This was by your definition an insurrection too right?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/arrests-...d=44925970

https://www.yahoo.com/news/washington-br...08490.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/inaugu...ge-n709946

and of course this happened.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/gov...rs-n889531

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

What a loser

https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1...hb-yw&s=19

---

Can you imagine being this stupid across all age groups?

https://twitter.com/JebraFaushay/status/...sAkLA&s=19

---

I don't think there was a riot involving thousands of people when Trump was elected or inaugurated.
Got a link?

There were a bunch of pundits speculating that the electoral college might be faithless and refuse to vote for Trump, then there was speculation that Congress or Pence might pull some strings to remove him from office before long.  All of those unlikely scenarios would have been nonviolent and legal.  No one was speculating about any violence or any coup.

LOL how soon we forget. Thousands of people blocking highways all over the country.  Yes, they were violent, had more than a few employees assaulted while just trying to get to their jobs. You can't be serious.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/thousand...d=43427653

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/us/tr...tests.html

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016...tests.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/1...n-violent/

Bro.
These are numerous, smaller protests, the number of violent people is much smaller.  The number of people breaking stuff is smaller.  The number of people trespassing is smaller.  The number of people assaulting cops is smaller.  And all of those people are spread through multiple cities on multiple nights.  Even added up, the amount of lawbreaking is smaller.
It doesn't compare.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.