---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

There are examples of federal law overlapping local law all over the place. Sometimes it's a "boondoggle" but other times it works, for instance the Americans with Disabilities Act is federally mandated but locally enforced. For the first maybe decade after it was passed, it was pre-empting and nullifying some state and local requirements. By now the state level laws have been revised to work within the framework ADA laid out. The ICC already has a standard zoning framework with common terminology and definitions and some municipalities are already revising their stuff to match it.

I agree that the main justification for zoning is to make sure infrastructure is adequate in a given area, however in practice this is simply not true.  Many places can afford to add infrastructure, and choose not to, because they want to "preserve their character." In some cases, like specific historical buildings, or truly rural areas, that's valid.  In most cases, it's not.

I call BS on the bold statement. You have no proof it is true. (unless you have some? got a link?) 

So your idea is to transfer the power of zoning to the federal government. Cool half baked idea. Problem you have is we are a republic. That means the local people make those decisions. Point is I have no business tell people in Iowa how they should live nor should you. Who made you that powerful? This is a States right issue not a federal one.

I thought it was clear that the sentence you bolded was my opinion. My opinion is "neighborhood character preservation" is almost always BS.

What is the difference between having federal oversight of zoning, versus federal oversight of handicapped accessibility?

And I'm not asking for any power at all.  I'm saying that a Harris administration might, with congressional approval, advise, and consent, create a department that sets up some minimum rules or an incentive/grant program with these goals.  It won't involve me at all.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

https://rbmralumni4harris.substack.com/p...irect=true

Over 100 Republican National Security Leaders Endorse Vice President Harris
Donald Trump cannot be trusted “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic . . . and bear true faith and allegiance to the same.

We are former national security and foreign policy officials who served in the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and/or Donald Trump, or as Republican Members of Congress. We have served in the White House, the Departments of Defense, Treasury, State, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, and other agencies and in Congress.

We believe that the President of the United States must be a principled, serious, and steady leader who can advance and defend American security and values, strengthen our alliances, and protect our democracy. We expect to disagree with Kamala Harris on many domestic and foreign policy issues, but we believe that she possesses the essential qualities to serve as President and Donald Trump does not. We therefore support her election to be President.

---

https://rbmralumni4harris.substack.com/p...irect=true

Over 100 Republican National Security Leaders Endorse Vice President Harris
Donald Trump cannot be trusted “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic . . . and bear true faith and allegiance to the same.

We are former national security and foreign policy officials who served in the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and/or Donald Trump, or as Republican Members of Congress. We have served in the White House, the Departments of Defense, Treasury, State, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, and other agencies and in Congress.

We believe that the President of the United States must be a principled, serious, and steady leader who can advance and defend American security and values, strengthen our alliances, and protect our democracy. We expect to disagree with Kamala Harris on many domestic and foreign policy issues, but we believe that she possesses the essential qualities to serve as President and Donald Trump does not. We therefore support her election to be President.

Yea, it doesn't surprise me big oil doesn't want Trump. It will cut into their profits. The barrel price of oil fell when he was in office.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

https://rbmralumni4harris.substack.com/p...irect=true

Over 100 Republican National Security Leaders Endorse Vice President Harris
Donald Trump cannot be trusted “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic . . . and bear true faith and allegiance to the same.

We are former national security and foreign policy officials who served in the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and/or Donald Trump, or as Republican Members of Congress. We have served in the White House, the Departments of Defense, Treasury, State, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, and other agencies and in Congress.

We believe that the President of the United States must be a principled, serious, and steady leader who can advance and defend American security and values, strengthen our alliances, and protect our democracy. We expect to disagree with Kamala Harris on many domestic and foreign policy issues, but we believe that she possesses the essential qualities to serve as President and Donald Trump does not. We therefore support her election to be President.

Yea, it doesn't surprise me big oil doesn't want Trump. It will cut into their profits. The barrel price of oil fell when he was in office.

That doesn't make sense.  The Democrats are trying to get us off of fossil fuels, big oil wants more drilling, and Trump wants more drilling.  And Biden cancelled the Keystone Pipeline, which big oil wanted.  So there's no way big oil wants Harris.

---

Yea, it doesn't surprise me big oil doesn't want Trump. It will cut into their profits. The barrel price of oil fell when he was in office.

That doesn't make sense.  The Democrats are trying to get us off of fossil fuels, big oil wants more drilling, and Trump wants more drilling.  There's no way big oil wants Harris.

This is the same campaign in some ways Biden ran. Run to the middle govern to the left. Harris for her entire career has been far left. She will after she gets your vote and the election be the same. They call them useful fools.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

That doesn't make sense.  The Democrats are trying to get us off of fossil fuels, big oil wants more drilling, and Trump wants more drilling.  There's no way big oil wants Harris.

This is the same campaign in some ways Biden ran. Run to the middle govern to the left. Harris for her entire career has been far left. She will after she gets your vote and the election be the same. They call them useful fools.

It's the same thing Trump is doing.  Run away from Project 2025, but once he gets in office, the people who wrote Project 2025 will be in his administration.  I say that because they were in his previous administration.

---

This is the same campaign in some ways Biden ran. Run to the middle govern to the left. Harris for her entire career has been far left. She will after she gets your vote and the election be the same. They call them useful fools.

It's the same thing Trump is doing.  Run away from Project 2025, but once he gets in office, the people who wrote Project 2025 will be in his administration.  I say that because they were in his previous administration.

Honestly, were you better off under Trump or Biden? People get all worked up, I do not. Most of what both are saying is outside the job of the president so I filter those things out. Taxes have to be approved by congress is an example. Problem I have with Kamela has is she has never worked for a living so has no understanding of the impact of what she is told to do. Let's face it she follows orders, the reason for the about face on policies. Trump, while he did come from the silver spoon group did have to work and has a better understanding and is better prepared. Still watching both before I decide.

PS if Trump is assassinated I vote straight Republican no matter the candidate. If Kamela is assassinated I vote Democrat. This is not Venezuela

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

It's the same thing Trump is doing.  Run away from Project 2025, but once he gets in office, the people who wrote Project 2025 will be in his administration.  I say that because they were in his previous administration.

Honestly, were you better off under Trump or Biden? People get all worked up, I do not. Most of what both are saying is outside the job of the president so I filter those things out. Taxes have to be approved by congress is an example. Problem I have with Kamela has is she has never worked for a living so has no understanding of the impact of what she is told to do. Let's face it she follows orders, the reason for the about face on policies. Trump, while he did come from the silver spoon group did have to work and has a better understanding and is better prepared. Still watching both before I decide.

PS if Trump is assassinated I vote straight Republican no matter the candidate. If Kamela is assassinated I vote Democrat. This is not Venezuela

Trump inherited $400 million and declared bankruptcy 6 times.  So I wouldn't hold up his work in the private sector as any kind of shining example for everyone else.

---

Honestly, were you better off under Trump or Biden? People get all worked up, I do not. Most of what both are saying is outside the job of the president so I filter those things out. Taxes have to be approved by congress is an example. Problem I have with Kamela has is she has never worked for a living so has no understanding of the impact of what she is told to do. Let's face it she follows orders, the reason for the about face on policies. Trump, while he did come from the silver spoon group did have to work and has a better understanding and is better prepared. Still watching both before I decide.

PS if Trump is assassinated I vote straight Republican no matter the candidate. If Kamela is assassinated I vote Democrat. This is not Venezuela

Trump inherited $400 million and declared bankruptcy 6 times.  So I wouldn't hold up his work in the private sector as any kind of shining example for everyone else.

LOL, not holding either up. Neither would be my first choice. In fact the way the "machines" work the best choices will not run. Fact is Kamala is a puppet for someone we do not know who and Trump is not. It makes me uncomfortable voting for someone like that. Sometimes the devil you know is much better than the devil you do not know. It can also be said as sometimes a person that appears fair is actually foul and one that appears foul is actually fair. Again if you look at the records Trump wins that hands down. So a lot still to understand and watch for between now and the election.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

Trump inherited $400 million and declared bankruptcy 6 times.  So I wouldn't hold up his work in the private sector as any kind of shining example for everyone else.

LOL, not holding either up. Neither would be my first choice. In fact the way the "machines" work the best choices will not run. Fact is Kamala is a puppet for someone we do not know who and Trump is not. It makes me uncomfortable voting for someone like that. Sometimes the devil you know is much better than the devil you do not know. It can also be said as sometimes a person that appears fair is actually foul and one that appears foul is actually fair. Again if you look at the records Trump wins that hands down. So a lot still to understand and watch for between now and the election.

Trump is every bit as beholden to his donors as Kamala is. And neither of them can really serve all of their donors at once.  They will each have hard choices about whose needs to prioritize.  It was always ever thus.  Trump is not actually rich enough to not need donors.

You have to basically choose which set of donors aligns most closely with you.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

LOL, not holding either up. Neither would be my first choice. In fact the way the "machines" work the best choices will not run. Fact is Kamala is a puppet for someone we do not know who and Trump is not. It makes me uncomfortable voting for someone like that. Sometimes the devil you know is much better than the devil you do not know. It can also be said as sometimes a person that appears fair is actually foul and one that appears foul is actually fair. Again if you look at the records Trump wins that hands down. So a lot still to understand and watch for between now and the election.

Trump is every bit as beholden to his donors as Kamala is. And neither of them can really serve all of their donors at once.  They will each have hard choices about whose needs to prioritize.  It was always ever thus.  Trump is not actually rich enough to not need donors.

You have to basically choose which set of donors aligns most closely with you.

LOL, Yes he needs donors, every candidate needs them. Rich enough?   Show me where/how you know the guys net worth.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

It's not commie-la's donors pulling the puppet strings (just like with Biden).  It's more like Obama advisors.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Teamsters Union rank and file voted overwhelmingly (60+%) for Trump. Teamsters instead decline to endorse anyone for president. They did not endorse the Democrats for the first time in my memory.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

Trump is every bit as beholden to his donors as Kamala is. And neither of them can really serve all of their donors at once.  They will each have hard choices about whose needs to prioritize.  It was always ever thus.  Trump is not actually rich enough to not need donors.

You have to basically choose which set of donors aligns most closely with you.

LOL, Yes he needs donors, every candidate needs them. Rich enough?   Show me where/how you know the guys net worth.

I didn't claim to know his net worth and don't need to know it.
All I know is Mr Can't-Be-Bought ™ has had his hand out for donations since day one back in 2015.  His early big time donors include the DeVos family and the Mnuchins.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

LOL, Yes he needs donors, every candidate needs them. Rich enough?   Show me where/how you know the guys net worth.

I didn't claim to know his net worth and don't need to know it.
All I know is Mr Can't-Be-Bought ™ has had his hand out for donations since day one back in 2015.  His early big time donors include the DeVos family and the Mnuchins.

Yea, many people have gotten filthy rich running for office over the years. Any money left over in the fund is theirs personally.  This needs to be changed. Bernie Sanders is one I can think of.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

Is NY in play for Trump?
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...9CA3g&s=19

---

Is NY in play for Trump?
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...9CA3g&s=19

Been thinking that for a while now..

---

Is NY in play for Trump?
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...9CA3g&s=19

Yes if the legally registered votes are only counted. The bad news is they have an unlimited amount of ballots that no amount of legal voting can overcome.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---

We believe that the President of the United States must be a principled, serious, and steady leader who can advance and defend American security and values, strengthen our alliances, and protect our democracy. We expect to disagree with Kamala Harris on many domestic and foreign policy issues, but we believe that she possesses the essential qualities to serve as President and Donald Trump does not. We therefore support her election to be President.

My problem is Kamala is none of those things. She flip flops on her stances, she shows 0 reason to believe she is a real leader, and world leaders will walk all over her. As trump said, she is a radical left lunatic that is just saying the right things but does not mean them.

---