Why wouldn't they take a 4th from us? Jeff Fisher loves us

Good thing Fisher isn't their GM.

---

Why wouldn't they take a 4th from us? Jeff Fisher loves us

 

Fisher isn't the GM. Les Snead is and he works with Caldwell in Atlanta.

---

;

;

I would not give up the 3rd, and I don't see St Louis accepting that deal for one of our 4ths. 

 

To be honest, I don't want to give up any of our picks in this draft, Too deep. I can accept getting whoever falls to us at 3. Or even trading DOWN from 3 and stockpiling even more picks. 

 

Thats what you do in deep drafts. 

 

Trading up in deep drafts is stupid. 

 

We're the only team they can trade with and still get the player they want. Robinson, Watkins, whomever assuming Houston takes a QB. 

---

;

;

25 %.  

 

The reason why I think it's as high as 25 % is there's a realistic chance the Texans will draft a QB with pick # 1 and the Rams will take a player at a more glaring need position with pick # 2.   

---

Where are the posters who were upset the team won some games at the end ? The tank for Teddy brigade?

I mean, if Clowney is gone TB should be there. So Im sure some will be happy. 

Clowney and Watts in Texas? Ouch. But they need a QB as much as we do. Should be interesting

---

Blakes Life Matters

Clowney is going to the Texans. I just don't see a way that they pass up on him..

---

Shock the world

Apparently, the dude crushed his Pro Day today. Not really a surprise or anything, but I think that squashes all hopes that he drops to us.

---

I'm trying to make myself more informed and less opinionated.

Stop saying whatever stupid thing you're talking about and pay attention to all the interesting things I have to say!

I would not give up the 3rd, and I don't see St Louis accepting that deal for one of our 4ths. 

 

To be honest, I don't want to give up any of our picks in this draft, Too deep. I can accept getting whoever falls to us at 3. Or even trading DOWN from 3 and stockpiling even more picks. 

 

Thats what you do in deep drafts. 

 

Trading up in deep drafts is stupid. 

 

How do you know how deep this draft is??? I am just playing devils advocate, but is there a surefire way to know what players will still be in the league in 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, etc....

 

So to call it a deep draft before anyone really plays on Sundays, I think is very premature and it is something that has to be reviewed years after.

---

How do you know how deep this draft is??? I am just playing devils advocate, but is there a surefire way to know what players will still be in the league in 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, etc....

 

So to call it a deep draft before anyone really plays on Sundays, I think is very premature and it is something that has to be reviewed years after.

 

well if your going to use this logic, then I could pretty much use your same logic against you - how do you know that Clowney is going to be a surefire top notch pro, worthy of trading up for?....

 

See, works both ways. 

---

I dont see him falling to 3 at all.  Texans will grab him

---

He'll go #1.

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

I would not give up the 3rd, and I don't see St Louis accepting that deal for one of our 4ths. 

 

To be honest, I don't want to give up any of our picks in this draft, Too deep. I can accept getting whoever falls to us at 3. Or even trading DOWN from 3 and stockpiling even more picks. 

 

Thats what you do in deep drafts. 

 

Trading up in deep drafts is stupid. 

 

If Clowney isn't available at pick 3, I don't think anyone's going to want to trade up.  

---

No way he gets to 3. 5% chance.

---

If Clowney isn't available at pick 3, I don't think anyone's going to want to trade up.  

 

Agree. Only slight chance would be if Oakland or Tampa wants to jump Cleveland to take Watkins. But in this scenario, I would hope the Jaguars would take Watkins.

---

How quickly things change pre draft right? Wasn't too long ago where it looked like we could have easily got him

---

How quickly things change pre draft right? Wasn't too long ago where it looked like we could have easily got him

 

But was it ever really realistic?

---

How quickly things change pre draft right? Wasn't too long ago where it looked like we could have easily got him

What's changed? Nobody knew what was going to happen...and nobody knows what is going to happen. It all has and will continue to be speculation.

---

Agree. Only slight chance would be if Oakland or Tampa wants to jump Cleveland to take Watkins. But in this scenario, I would hope the Jaguars would take Watkins.

 

Would much rather trade down with how deep this WR class is.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Very slim

---

What's changed? Nobody knew what was going to happen...and nobody knows what is going to happen. It all has and will continue to be speculation.

 

Uh, no!

 

People have twittered about this stuff on their spaceface pages. That happened.

 

Dude, people have changed what they are talking about what may happen in May. That's huge. I mean, people who write words about sports teams are now writing different words about those sports teams.

 

Read that last sentence again if you can. They are writing different words now. You need to face the virtual reality that you're as stoopid as a bottle of monkey wrenches.

---

I'm trying to make myself more informed and less opinionated.

Stop saying whatever stupid thing you're talking about and pay attention to all the interesting things I have to say!