Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
looks like we may not get anyone we want

#1

http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftrumorm...p#rams0401

 

while like everything else you take it with a grain of salt, but this is the first time i've heard of this for St.Louis and it seems viable


[Image: 0KIO8ln.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

[Image: 2uxvexv.jpg]

 

The driving force behind Walter Football..

 


[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

#3

Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftrumormill.php#rams0401'>http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftrumormill.php#rams0401</a>


while like everything else you take it with a grain of salt, but this is the first time i've heard of this for St.Louis and it seems viable
yeah alot of the Rams fans want Mack and it looks like that is who they will take. I will be more than happy with Watkins if we cant trade back
Reply

#4
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2014, 01:36 AM by archer56.)

Quote:yeah alot of the Rams fans want Mack and it looks like that is who they will take. I will be more than happy with Watkins if we cant trade back
his mock that he had of us trading back to take mike evans didnt' really bother me at all.  And we could use the draft picks we got to maybe trade up to the top of the second to get the best QB left. Imagine if Manziel slipped into the second and we got both of them.  Crazyyyy


[Image: 0KIO8ln.gif]
Reply

#5

Quote:his mock that he had of us trading back to take mike evans didnt' really bother me at all. And we could use the draft picks we got to maybe trade up to the top of the second to get the best QB left. Imagine is Manziel slipped into the second and we got both of them. Crazyyyy
would much rather trade back and take Evans but would be more than happy with Watkins. If Msnziel falls to the 20s i think Dave would make the trade up.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

IMO it really brings to light something i wasn't thinking about, and that's exactly if St Louis takes mack, or someone trades up and takes him, none of the Qbs seem to be worth it in the first, like I have been projecting, which means we could have watkins.  Who around 10 would be worth it for us to take?  Where would it be okay to take anthony barr?


[Image: 0KIO8ln.gif]
Reply

#7

This team needs playmakers.  At 3, even if the Rams take Mack, that would leave Watkins as a very solid pick.  Archer56, if the Jags pick at around 10, there are still good picks possibly available, including OLB/DE Barr and WR Evans to name a couple.  Also, at least one or two of the 4 QBs will likely be there, and the value is better there.  Trading back and picking up another starter talent in the 2nd or 3rd round is pretty appealing in this deep draft.    


Reply

#8

#becausejaguars?


Reply

#9

LOL.

Anyone we want?

Speak for yourself OP.

I want more than one of two players.


Fact: The jaguars will acquire multiple talented football players in the draft. It is likely that one or two of them will be an upgrade to their position on the team before the season ends.

Sky not falling.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Quote:would much rather trade back and take Evans but would be more than happy with Watkins. If Msnziel falls to the 20s i think Dave would make the trade up.
I think if Dave would be interested in trading back into the first round to get Manziel, then he would take him in the top ten.

Reply

#11

Quote:#becausejaguars?
 

Your response to everything?

;

;
Reply

#12

Quote:[Image: 2uxvexv.jpg]

 

The driving force behind Walter Football..
 

So perfect 

;

;
Reply

#13

Rams taking Mack at 2 would be a good thing.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftrumormill.php#rams0401'>http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftrumormill.php#rams0401</a>

 

while like everything else you take it with a grain of salt, but this is the first time i've heard of this for St.Louis and it seems viable


So, a draft touted as one of the deepest in recent memory only has 2 players worth taking in your eyes?


We might as well just give up now since the ultimate draft resource has dashed our hopes.
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

#15

Did you really just start a new thread out of concern based on something a blogger like walterfootball said? lol.

 

If we have to take Sammy Watkins as a consolation prize at the 3rd pick, I will just be devastated. Trade back into the 1st round and grab Teddy too.


Reply

#16

Is this with the assumption that the Texans take Clowney? So then we get Watkins. I'm so fine with that
Reply

#17

Personally not a fan of Mack.  So, you're speaking for yourself here. I think it'd be great if the Rams take Mack.  


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2014, 10:20 AM by J-Mizzal.)

Quote:LOL.

Anyone we want?

Speak for yourself OP.

I want more than one of two players.


Fact: The jaguars will acquire multiple talented football players in the draft. It is likely that one or two of them will be an upgrade to their position on the team before the season ends.

Sky not falling.
This

 

People need to stop setting themselves up for disappointment, I have 5 guys I would be happy with at 3, and many other players if we trade back and get an extra 2nd. Only liking 2 players or 1 player is only gonna make you upset when we dont pick the guy you want, maybe thats what some people want tho. 


<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Reply

#19

Worse case scenario we get one of Clowney, Mack, or Watkins.  I don't see how that's a bad thing.


Reply

#20

Quote:Worse case scenario we get one of Clowney, Mack, or Watkins. I don't see how that's a bad thing.


Worst case is we reach on a QB there
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!