The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Would you have taken Clowney at #2 last year if he we're draft eligible?
|
Putting our revisionist history caps on the question is simple. If Clowney were able to enter the draft last year would you have selected him with our first round pick? For fun we'll assume the Chiefs would pass using the same reason the Texans may, the 3-4 defense.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:What year would we not take Clowney at 2 would be the better question! Considering people like to bring up that "he had a down year" this year, I'm curious as to people's opinions with this year being thrown out.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
would have been great because Matthews would have still been an option this year in that scenario
Quote:would have been great because Matthews would have still been an option this year in that scenario Or you can also factor in Monroe still being on this team as well. Either under the tag with the potential to trade during the draft for picks or eventually under a long term contract.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Is this a joke? The chiefs would have either taken him or gotten some other teams 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th for him.. that draft was very weak..
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Is this a joke? The chiefs would have either taken him or gotten some other teams 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th for him.. that draft was very weak.. Can you say that for a fact? Are the Texans (same situation) an undeniable lock to take Clowney at #1?
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I'll do you one better.
Not only would I have taken Clowney. But both Bridgewater and Manziel, even last year, would have been the two best QBs in the draft.
I want 3 players. Clowney, Bridgewater, Manziel. Jaguars have the number 3 pick. Just give me one of those 3 at 3, and I'm happy.
My top 6 favorite posters on these boards Deacon Pirkster Shack Del Rio Haterade Hurricane Badger
Quote:I'll do you one better.Manziel, Bridgewater, Bortles, Murray, Carr, McCarron, Mettenberger are all better than the QBs last year IMO
Quote:Manziel, Bridgewater, Bortles, Murray, Carr, McCarron, Mettenberger are all better than the QBs last year IMO Last year was certainly a down year for Qb's, that's for sure. It was a bad year to tank for a QB. Even this year has some real uncertainty as far as taking a QB high in the draft. What is going on with the college QB position lately???
I survived the Gus Bradley Error.
Quote:Can you say that for a fact? Are the Texans (same situation) an undeniable lock to take Clowney at #1?No but this draft has other players that would warrant bein taken over Clowney, last year didn't. The top 2 players were LT's who wouldn't even be rated at the #1/#2 tackle this year. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.