Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Am I the only one that doesn't "fear" the clots?

#21

AFCS is arguably the weakest division
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

They did sweep Jax without much difficulty at all last year, so there's not much confidence there yet. 

 

I feel Jax has made more improvements then Indy has this offseason, but there's still a huge gap. But let's face it, Jax isn't jumping them until Jax gets a good QB to compete and a defense that can hold it's own.

 

Any given Sunday though. The Colts aren't anywhere near as threatening as they were under Manning, but that's a given.


Reply

#23

Colts are still the best team in the division (although if Houston gets a QB) and they could still get better. I still don't know why the colts traded for T rich but still gotta pay them respect because they are on top of the division. I'd like to think we will play them much more competitively this season though.
Reply

#24

I look at the Colts as the toughest team in the division. No, they are not juggernauts, and in fact, they play pretty awful in a lot of games. Luck is a clutch QB though, and they always seem to get some lucky break or some weird call on the field that puts them back in most games. That's what makes them tough. No matter how bad you think they are beat, they always get themselves back in it toward the end of the game. You can never count them out of any game.


Reply

#25

Quote: 

 

Andrew Luck is average.
 

LOL, you have the gall to put something I said in your sig, while saying the above garbage?!?! Laughing Laughing Laughing 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#26

Luck isn't Manning and I don't see him ever getting close to that level, therefore they are not to be feared in the same way they were in Jugheads day.

 

They may be the best in the AFCS this year, but that's not exactly a ringing endorsement.


Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply

#27
(This post was last modified: 04-26-2014, 10:08 PM by xJAGGYx.)

I don't fear those [BAD WORD REMOVED] [BAD WORD REMOVED] [BAD WORD REMOVED] [BAD WORD REMOVED].


I think I made myself clear.
Reply

#28

Quote:LOL, you have the gall to put something I said in your sig, while saying the above garbage?!?! Laughing Laughing Laughing
What I said is true. He IS average. LOL. 

Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

#29

Quote:What I said is true. He IS average. LOL. 
 

you should probably just stop watching NFL football

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#30

He's above average and will probably be above that soon. Credit where credit is due.
Reply

#31
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2014, 12:08 AM by Coltswarriors.)

Quote:you should probably just stop watching NFL football
 

Not worth arguing with him, he's a blind troll.


Reply

#32

Well luck isn't average, i'd say he's "very good" Not great, not elite by any stretch at this point but he's certainly good.  He doesn't scare me like Peyton/Rodgers/Brady do. 


Reply

#33
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2014, 01:08 AM by Tommy.)

Quote:you should probably just stop watching NFL football
 

Quote:Not worth arguing with him, he's a blind troll.
 

At this point in his career Andrew Luck is an average QB in the NFL.

 

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/...ents/2013/


Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#34

Quote:At this point in his career Andrew Luck is an average QB in the NFL.

 
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/quarterback-rating-by-total-and-components/2013/'>http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/quarterback-rating-by-total-and-components/2013/</a>
that list also has Foles, Bradford and Alex Smith ahead of Luck do I'd take it for a grain of salt. On the field Luck is close if not above average. He's only getting better.
Reply

#35

Quote:At this point in his career Andrew Luck is an average QB in the NFL.

 

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/...ents/2013/
 

Ya. Nick Foles is the best QB in the league and Josh McCown is the 3rd best.

 

You really love making yourself look foolish, don't you?

Reply

#36

Quote:And the obsession continues...
Agreed.

 

Your obsession with trolling our board is unhealthy.

 

The colts are still the best team in our weak division until proven otherwise.  But I've never been afraid of them, and we always play them tough.

 

We will play them even tougher this year.

Reply

#37

By the metrics, Luck is mediocre at best. However, when his team is down, he somehow manages to put some plays together to get back in the game. It's a great quality and hides a lot ugly plays.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#38

Quote:Ya. Nick Foles is the best QB in the league and Josh McCown is the 3rd best.

 

You really love making yourself look foolish, don't you?
Spin it anyway you want. QBR is made off of stats. Nick Foles played very very well last year, as did McCown. Luck didn't even crack top 10. Stop letting your fandom blind you. It's terrible. 

Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

#39

Your picking a QB and you have Luck, Foles, and McCown on the board. 

 

Who are you going to pick?

 

/argument


Reply

#40

Quote:Spin it anyway you want. QBR is made off of stats. Nick Foles played very very well last year, as did McCown. Luck didn't even crack top 10. Stop letting your fandom blind you. It's terrible.
I don't think he's letting his fandom blind him.. Anyone with football sense can tell you Luck is far better than Foles, McCown, Smith etc..
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!