Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Draft Bans

#1

Which selection will result in the most bans/suspensions of forum members? I'm thinking Bortles or Matthews
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Which would if the Jags take them?


Or which will if someone else takes them?


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#3

I wish KraYz was around. 

 

He actually isn't banned. (anymore) He posted about a month ago....I guess he's just given up the board. 


Reply

#4

Quote:Which would if the Jags take them?


Or which will if someone else takes them?
Which would if the Jags select him
Reply

#5

Quote:I wish KraYz was around. 

 

He actually isn't banned. (anymore) He posted about a month ago....I guess he's just given up the board. 
He posted today in the twitter thread 

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2014, 04:39 PM by The Eleventh Doctor.)

If the Jags select them?


Probably Matthews/Robinson. Partly because we all know a certain user would become unbearable (and I'm not talking about any k-9's) Could also see Derek Carr making the moderator's job hard if we pick him up.  


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#7

Hah. Carr in the first... What if we passed on Clowney if he fell to 3?
Reply

#8

AJ McCarron! Those tattoos make my eyes bleed
Reply

#9

If Clowney fell to 3, with Manziel and Watkins there, with a trade back possible to Det and Buf and we select Garrapalo lol #apocalypse

 

GO JAGS!!


Let's Get Em!!!! Go Jags!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Its without a doubt an OT. 


Reply

#11

Quote:Its without a doubt an OT.


This.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

#12

Quote:Its without a doubt an OT.
Likely. Our biggest need is playmakers, and we draft a RT? Uggg
Reply

#13

NOT drafting Manziel or Bridgewater should send a few over the edge.


Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Johnny Manziel is also a possibility given the influx of users that will arrive, and flood the board.


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#15

Not selecting Bridgewater at #3
Reply

#16

Quote:Johnny Manziel is also a possibility given the influx of users that will arrive, and flood the board.
I wonder if Dallas fans would flood our board
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!