The tweet surely made it sound as if there was still some doubt as to which of them were starting. It said Bradley was "leaning" towards McCray. IMO, after McCray played well -again- last Sunday, there should be no "leaning" towards McCray at this point, the answer out of Bradleys mouth should have been a decisive "McCray's the starter Sunday, period, because he's earned it" Period. If you're in a position of leadership, you will be respected more with decisions made with conviction rather than wishy washy. Theres really no reason for Bradley to be still leaving the door open for a Gratz start for Sunday, which his tweet suggested. 

 

You are the textbook definition of armchair quarterback. You are a cliche and you may not even know it.

---

 

 

Gus Bradley actually did have a conviction about McCray, but he wanted to double-check before naming Gratz the backup/nickel.

 

:ermm: :wacko:  

---

:ermm: :wacko:

 

can't say i disagree with that reaction.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

can't say i disagree with that reaction.

 

I know, right??  

 

Its apparent JW doesn't know the definition of doing something with "conviction". 

---

I know, right??  

 

Its apparent JW doesn't know the definition of doing something with "conviction".

There are so many things she doesn't know.... This is just one of a thousand.

---

I know, right?

 

It's apparent JW doesn't know the definition of doing something with "conviction."

 

I think Gus Bradley already knew before Wednesday's practice who his starting running back should be or had a gut feeling Storm is that guy.

---

So the game of TMD vs. The board is back lol.

 

Who's winning?

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

Who's winning?

---

This topic gave me a concussion

---

This topic gave me a concussion

Arm or head?

---

This topic gave me a concussion.

 

Banging your head on a brick wall is doing that.

---

 

Who is the guy behind Jedd Fisch?

---

Who is the guy behind Jedd Fisch?

 

 

Marcus Stroud

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Who is the guy behind Jedd Fisch?

 

Don't know - but the shape of his head looks like Garrard - who did attend several practices and a game last year. 

---

Marcus Stroud

very possible as well

---

Don't know - but the shape of his head looks like Garrard - who did attend several practices and a game last year.

 

Hire him for assistant quarterback coach!

---

Hire him for assistant quarterback coach!

They kind-of already have two QB coaches in Scelfo and Fisch.  Fisch is a former QB coach and judging from videos of practice and fans posting about open practices - Fisch spends A LOT of time coaching the quarterbacks.  

 

Adding DG might make it too many cooks in the kitchen.

---

They kind-of already have two QB coaches in Scelfo and Fisch.  Fisch is a former QB coach and judging from videos of practice and fans posting about open practices - Fisch spends A LOT of time coaching the quarterbacks.  

 

Adding DG might make it too many cooks in the kitchen.

 

OK I thought Fisch had only one job title and Scelfo is doing all the QBC work.

---

Hire him for assistant quarterback coach!

 

what credentials do you know of david garrard that would make you clamor for him to be an assistant qb coach?

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

What credentials do you know of David Garrard that would make you clamor for him to be an assistant QB coach?

 

Being one of the best quarterbacks in team history. But I actually would prefer Mark Brunell for the job if he was right-handed.

---