Yeah how dare anyone try and have fun and try to make projections. We need to shut down the college forum until the day before the draft.

 

Projections for the players are fine if they are limited to "should be a first round pick," etc. and not based on assumptions about our pick numbers. I have no problem with people saying Amari Cooper will go in the first round. But saying "He will look good in teal" is ridiculous.

---

Projections for the players are fine if they are limited to "should be a first round pick," etc. and not based on assumptions about our pick numbers. I have no problem with people saying Amari Cooper will go in the first round. But saying "He will look good in teal" is ridiculous.

 

why? the teal, i think, would look really good with his skin tone and it has a way of making a WR look sleeker.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Projections for the players are fine if they are limited to "should be a first round pick," etc. and not based on assumptions about our pick numbers. I have no problem with people saying Amari Cooper will go in the first round. But saying "He will look good in teal" is ridiculous.

Absolutely agree. Anyone that says something like that needs to be banned from this message board at the very least. Maybe even banned from their ISP.


I remember one guy said something similar about how he wished we picked Aaron Rodgers over Matt Jones. I wanted to strangle the guy. Took me months to calm down over that one. Had to go through some intense counseling over all the black eyes and broken dishes that occurred as a result of that one comment.

---

Absolutely agree. Anyone that says something like that needs to be banned from this message board at the very least. Maybe even banned from their ISP.


I remember one guy said something similar about how he wished we picked Aaron Rodgers over Matt Jones. I wanted to strangle the guy. Took me months to calm down over that one. Had to go through some intense counseling over all the black eyes and broken dishes that occurred as a result of that one comment.

 

I remember that. It was 20/20 hindsight because he turned out to be a much better quarterback than ours and Matt Jones ended up being a bust. The real mistake was which receiver we picked, not picking a receiver instead of a quarterback.

---

I'm honestly thinking we're(jags) are picking second, I'm thinking we are going to trade back a few spots for a nice little deal. I'm hoping we fix our biggest needs first o-line, cornerback, safety, or linebacker rather than going with depth at d-line. I hope I'm not the only person that thinks this I watch the jags play every weekend and the only consistent thing I'm seeing is the pass rush.

---