But if Marcedes is so bad why would they trade for him?

---

But if Marcedes is so bad why would they trade for him?

 

Teams in playoff contention desperate/ having a need at a certain position will do kooky things.....look at Indy earlier this year giving a 1st for Richardson, who is about as good as waiver wire fodder at this point. 

---

Teams in playoff contention desperate/ having a need at a certain position will do kooky things.....look at Indy earlier this year giving a 1st for Richardson, who is about as good as waiver wire fodder at this point. 

 

When was the last time Green Bay did something kooky?

 

Indy on the other hand may well just have a buffoon in charge. If anything we should ask for 2 2nd rounders or more off Indy for Cecil shorts

---

Sorry but I do expect at least ONE trade of current vets to add an additional pick. I'd like to see more than one, but -one trade- is not an unreasonable expectation for a team in our circumstances. 

 

Ohhhh you 'expect' it.

 

Has anyone told Caldwell? Guys, someone phone Caldwell, tell him Mad Dog 'expects' you to make a trade. If you dont do it he is going to post so many bad things about you and how you are too stupid to follow his instructions.

---

Just to be different, Bortles.

I would love to get some of the Packers late round picks for Marcedes....

 

Hope Finley recovers... Never want to see someone injured like that.

---

I ain't no monkey... I'm an ape.

This is some awesome stuff.


Pull out some random trade that 'Caldwell should do' then you can argue endlessly about it.


Kudos.

---

Ohhhh you 'expect' it.


Has anyone told Caldwell? Guys, someone phone Caldwell, tell him Mad Dog 'expects' you to make a trade. If you dont do it he is going to post so many bad things about you and how you are too stupid to follow his instructions.

Dont worry, two years from now, TMD will be whining about how Caldwell didnt trade Marcedes to GB for a first in 2013.


Once you ask for proof of this trade, he will say that he " doesnt feel like looking for the link " and that he " never forgets things like this."


Just ask him about the 2nd we shouldve got from Tampa for Mojo.


Seriously, its quite hilarious.

---

Dont worry, two years from now, TMD will be whining about how Caldwell didnt trade Marcedes to GB for a first in 2013.


Once you ask for proof of this trade, he will say that he " doesnt feel like looking for the link " and that he " never forgets things like this."


Just ask him about the 2nd we shouldve got from Tampa for Mojo.


Seriously, its quite hilarious.

I agree Joe

---

I ain't no monkey... I'm an ape.

But if Marcedes is so bad why would they trade for him?

 

Don't you get it. Suggest an unrealistic trade so you can soil yourself when it doesn't happen.

---

Dont worry, two years from now, TMD will be whining about how Caldwell didnt trade Marcedes to GB for a first in 2013.


Once you ask for proof of this trade, he will say that he " doesnt feel like looking for the link " and that he " never forgets things like this."


Just ask him about the 2nd we shouldve got from Tampa for Mojo.


Seriously, its quite hilarious.

 

Dont forget Garrard, I'm sure we could have got something along the lines of a 2nd or 3rd for him if we had only has that Mad Dog forsight and salemanship.

---

Just to be different, Bortles.

Dont worry, two years from now, TMD will be whining about how Caldwell didnt trade Marcedes to GB for a first in 2013.


Once you ask for proof of this trade, he will say that he " doesnt feel like looking for the link " and that he " never forgets things like this."


Just ask him about the 2nd we shouldve got from Tampa for Mojo.


Seriously, its quite hilarious.

 

 

Don't you get it. Suggest an unrealistic trade so you can soil yourself when it doesn't happen.

 

Who's asking for a first rounder? Oh thats right, no one. 

 

As stated quite a few times in this thread, the Jags were able to get a 5th rounder for an overpaid nothing in Mike Thomas, so thinking that they could get a 5th for Marcedes from a TE needy team, is not unrealistic....

 

But keep acting like it is....

---

Who's asking for a first rounder? Oh thats right, no one. 

 

As stated quite a few times in this thread, the Jags were able to get a 5th rounder for an overpaid nothing in Mike Thomas, so thinking that they could get a 5th for Marcedes from a TE needy team, is not unrealistic....

 

But keep acting like it is....

 

 These outlier examples like the Thomas trade just means it is not impossible. Still unrealistic.

---

;

;

When was the last time Green Bay did something kooky?

 

 

When 22 other teams with smarter GMs bypassed Rogers then the idiot GM from GBay drafted some dude named Rogers.  How stupid when you already have Favre.  It will set them back for quite some time.

---

Who's asking for a first rounder? Oh thats right, no one.


As stated quite a few times in this thread, the Jags were able to get a 5th rounder for an overpaid nothing in Mike Thomas, so thinking that they could get a 5th for Marcedes from a TE needy team, is not unrealistic....


But keep acting like it is....

I just said 1st rnd to emphasize how big of an idiot you will make urself look like when this doesnt happen.


A 5th for Marcedes isnt unrealistic until u take into account it was made up by a man on a message board.


There are plenty other teams with TEs they would love to trade for a 5th.


Maybe GB isnt interested in trading for a TE. Maybe GB likes their backups. Maybe Finley is holding a kitten hostage, threatening to kill it if a trade is made.


This whole 5th rounder for Marcedes is a shot in the dark, and therefore highly unrealistic.

---

 

A 5th for Marcedes isnt unrealistic until u take into account it was made up by a man on a message board.

 

 

Oh, I see. Once ideas are posted on a message board they become invalidated. No matter if they make sense for both teams or not. Gotcha. 

---

Not to mention Ted Thompson doesn't trade away his draft picks for veterans.  I can't think of one example where he has. 

---

Oh, I see. Once ideas are posted on a message board they become invalidated. No matter if they make sense for both teams or not. Gotcha.

So Green Bay trading for a player that's played maybe 25 snaps this year 'makes sense'? Gotcha.

---

Oh, I see. Once ideas are posted on a message board they become invalidated. No matter if they make sense for both teams or not. Gotcha.

... yea pretty much.


You dont think 31 other teams have players they would love to trade for a 5th?


Go alert their message boards to make sure some random dude makes a trade proposal.

---

The Packers are also hurt at DL and OLB.  Maybe we could package Lewis, Alualu, Babin, and Branch and get their 5th, 6th, and 7th round picks. 

---

The Packers are also hurt at DL and OLB. Maybe we could package Lewis, Alualu, Babin, and Branch and get their 5th, 6th, and 7th round picks.

Ughhhhh this makes some sense!!!!


Why is Caldwell waiting!!! If this doesnt happen by the trade deadline he's an idiot!!!

---