Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Would of a Tebow led Cardinals beaten the Panthers?

#21

Quote:Actually the grammar is correct except from using a hyphen between Tebow and led
 

Really?

 

"Would of a Tebow led Cardinals beaten the Panthers" is grammatically correct?

 

Shouldn't the question be posed as "Would a Tebow led Cardinals team have beaten the Panthers"?

 

It's that "of" in there and the lack of "have", or it's contraction, that keeps throwing me off.

 

Then again, J-dub is the self-annointed Grammar Queen 'round here and she's quiet on it, so maybe I'm the one who's off.

I'm trying to make myself more informed and less opinionated.

Stop saying whatever stupid thing you're talking about and pay attention to all the interesting things I have to say!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

Quote:Actually the grammar is correct except from using a hyphen between Tebow and led


Oh dear, child.
Reply

#23

No it's not proper grammar.

 

"Would have a Tebow-led Cardinals have beaten the Panthers" would be correct.

 

It's ridiculous how many people think "would of" is proper instead of "would have"

 

Regards...............the Chiefjag


Reply

#24

Quote:No it's not proper grammar.


"Would have a Tebow-led Cardinals have beaten the Panthers" would be correct.


It's ridiculous how many people think "would of" is proper instead of "would have"


Regards...............the Chiefjag


Still incorrect. "Would a Tebow-led Cardinals team have beaten the Panthers?" is correct.
Reply

#25

I'm just going to put this out there that we have differences in grammar, so I'm just going to say this is the correct British grammar!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#26

Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?


Huh
Reply

#27

Quote:Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?
 

Quote:Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?
 

It would be thy Panth'rs.

Reply

#28

Quote:Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?
 

Lo, and yea verily.

 

Also, forsooth.

I'm trying to make myself more informed and less opinionated.

Stop saying whatever stupid thing you're talking about and pay attention to all the interesting things I have to say!
Reply

#29

Quote:It would be thy Panth'rs.
 

They art not mine Panth'rs!


Huh
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!