Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Beasley or Fowler?

#1

Can't decide between the two. Both have the intangibles, but you either choose the athletic freak or the guy with nonstop motor.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Can't decide between the two. Both have the intangibles, but you either choose the athletic freak or the guy with nonstop motor.
Reply

Reply

#4

Fowler. 


Reply

#5

Can't go wrong either way, imo. Slight edge to Beasley for me.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


Reply

#7

bigger is better in the NFL.  Both as you say can really play.  

 

I'm happy if we get Williams, Fowler, or Beasley --> trade down.  We are in a good spot this year.


Reply

#8
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2015, 04:07 PM by Haterade.)

Beasley but we should take Amari
Reply

#9

Trade next year's first and take them both. Problem solved.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Only reason I wouldn't go Amarillo because Alabama players have not shown to transfer well to the Nfl. Except maybe for Julio and Lacy, the rest have been mediocre or bust from a higher regarded football school.
Reply

#11

Only reason I wouldn't go Amarillo because Alabama players have not shown to transfer well to the Nfl. Except maybe for Julio and Lacy, the rest have been mediocre or bust from a higher regarded football school.
Reply

#12

I would prefer Beasley, because like telvin, he adds the element of speed to the linebacker position which we lack.
Reply

#13

I would prefer Beasley, because like telvin, he adds the element of speed to the linebacker position which we lack.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

I would take Fowler, because I think we need a DE/leo more than we need a LB/leo.  


Reply

#15

Fowler
Reply

#16

I'm leaning Beasley. Also, from a pure analytical standpoint he fits our scheme almost perfectly. Someone posted it in the Beasley thread I believe. I'd he happy with either though, or Williams.
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#17

Fowler
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

I have grown to love Beasley.  He's my pick between the two.


Reply

#19

Beasley, and by a lot.


"A man with no sauce is lost.

<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce."
Reply

#20

This should be a poll
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!