We were mocked constantly at either Couples or Prince. But we didn't get Watt, we got Blaine

Can't really blame the Jags for that. We needed a QB at the time and he was high priority.. Nobody really knew how big of a turd he was going to lay in the NFL..

---

Gus will know which pass rusher is the best fit for his defense, and Dave will plan the draft accordingly.  I like Beasley because of the quickness and athleticism, but I trust Gus to know this stuff better than me. 

---

JJ Watt didn't look like an elite pass rusher when he came out. If we redid that draft today, he would go #1.

Yup he also was a guy who people didint know if he would be a DE or DT, he had like 5.5 sacks his SR year, all these pass rushers has a chance to be good, its up to the teams to make the right decision.

 

I would be happy with Williams, Fowler, Beasley, Ray or Bud Dupree, I just dont trust Gregory 

---

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>

Even though JJ watt wasn't a dominant pass rusher in college, he had all the tools and measurables. He just developed his skills.


That's why I worry about some players like Fowler. Wasn't a great pass rusher in college and doesn't have the measurables.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Even though JJ watt wasn't a dominant pass rusher in college, he had all the tools and measurables. He just developed his skills.


That's why I worry about some players like Fowler. Wasn't a great pass rusher in college and doesn't have the measurables.

 

 

Yeah, Fowler after watching him and seeing his athleticism doesn't excite me much.  Red flags all over the place.

 

JJ Watt and Fowler don't even compare.  One is an elite athlete the other is not.

 

Beasley over any other pass rusher at the top of the draft for me.  Productive for multiple years and the athlete to go with it.

---

We were mocked constantly at either Couples or Prince. But we didn't get Watt, we got Blaine

Ryan Kerrigan actually was most mocked to Jags

---

Even though JJ watt wasn't a dominant pass rusher in college, he had all the tools and measurables. He just developed his skills.


That's why I worry about some players like Fowler. Wasn't a great pass rusher in college and doesn't have the measurables.

The guy lead the SEC in QB hurries, rushed from all different positions, can rush with power and speed, 261 lbs running a 4.6, of course your not gonna compare him to JJ Watt, his measurables are similar to Orakpo and Clay Mathews 

---

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>

The guy lead the SEC in QB hurries, rushed from all different positions, can rush with power and speed, 261 lbs running a 4.6, of course your not gonna compare him to JJ Watt, his measurables are similar to Orakpo and Clay Mathews 

You're using the least useful drill for a DE to make your statement. Fowler was quite poor in the ones that matter most: 3 cone, broad jump, vertical jump. Orakpo was 90th percentile in every drill, and Clay was above average to very good in all of the drills too. Fowler isn't close to those two from an athletic comparison standpoint. 

---

You're using the least useful drill for a DE to make your statement. Fowler was quite poor in the ones that matter most: 3 cone, broad jump, vertical jump. Orakpo was 90th percentile in every drill, and Clay was above average to very good in all of the drills too. Fowler isn't close to those two from an athletic comparison standpoint.

Red flags!!!

---

When I draft a player top 3 as a pass rusher he damn well better be a strong, powerful, and quick rushing end and none of these guys are that. None of them. Rarely do you see any of them completely whoop an offensive lineman. They only way they win is on pure athleticism. These guys don't seem too much better than someone like Dion Jordan coming out of college.

 

Whoa whoa...Gregory compares favorably to Jordan. But Fowler is more refined against the run than Jordan, and Beasley is an elite athlete.

---

Lags was gushing about Shane Ray "exploding off the line of scrimmage" from the game tape he's watched.

 

And then the OT got his hand on him...and the play was over.

---

Ryan Kerrigan actually was most mocked to Jags

Yep, this. Kerrigan was the consensus mock to the Jags, until the moment the Jaguars traded up and then it was clear the QB was the target.

---

You're using the least useful drill for a DE to make your statement. Fowler was quite poor in the ones that matter most: 3 cone, broad jump, vertical jump. Orakpo was 90th percentile in every drill, and Clay was above average to very good in all of the drills too. Fowler isn't close to those two from an athletic comparison standpoint. 

 

I think everyone falls in love with these new analytics stuff, and it certainly "pops" when you see that huge number or that huge web like you see with Beasley. But just like when it comes to arm strength with QBs, sometimes...having "good enough" is "good enough" if the guy has the feel for the game and the work ethic to improve. I've mentioned this quite a few times before, but Fowler's measurables compare favorably to Chris Clemons...the guy who the LEO was created for in Seattle.

 

Clemons: 6'3 236 (he's bulked up since. He's around the same size now as Fowler)

4.68 in the 40, 1.72 in 10 yard, 7.48 3-cone, 35" vert, 9'08 broad

 

Fowler: 6'3 261

4.60 in the 40, 1.59 in 10 yard, 7.40 in 3-cone, 32.5 vert, 9'04 broad

 

Is he the athlete that Beasley is? No. But is he good enough to play LEO? Well, if we use the original LEO as the benchmark, then he certainly looks like it.

---

I think everyone falls in love with these new analytics stuff, and it certainly "pops" when you see that huge number or that huge web like you see with Beasley. But just like when it comes to arm strength with QBs, sometimes...having "good enough" is "good enough" if the guy has the feel for the game and the work ethic to improve. I've mentioned this quite a few times before, but Fowler's measurables compare favorably to Chris Clemons...the guy who the LEO was created for in Seattle.


Clemons: 6'3 236 (he's bulked up since. He's around the same size now as Fowler)

4.68 in the 40, 1.72 in 10 yard, 7.48 3-cone, 35" vert, 9'08 broad


Fowler: 6'3 261

4.60 in the 40, 1.59 in 10 yard, 7.40 in 3-cone, 32.5 vert, 9'04 broad


Is he the athlete that Beasley is? No. But is he good enough to play LEO? Well, if we use the original LEO as the benchmark, then he certainly looks like it.

Did you really just compare fowler to Clemons?


Fowler to me is a lot like suggs.


The person doing his best Clemons impersonation in this draft is Shane ray.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

I think everyone falls in love with these new analytics stuff, and it certainly "pops" when you see that huge number or that huge web like you see with Beasley. But just like when it comes to arm strength with QBs, sometimes...having "good enough" is "good enough" if the guy has the feel for the game and the work ethic to improve. I've mentioned this quite a few times before, but Fowler's measurables compare favorably to Chris Clemons...the guy who the LEO was created for in Seattle.

 

i know, I already wrote up all of this in defense of Fowler a couple of times, too. If it is true that a lot of UDFA level athletes like Clemons was can be successful as a LEO, perhaps the position is kind of like the way the Seahawks/Gus Bradley late round mold of CB is, and we can just ignore the position until day 3 and find a quality fit. Who knows. 

---

And then the OT got his hand on him...and the play was over.

 

 

...because the ref called offensive holding.

---

'02

The crop of guys that can come in and make an immediate dominant impact is a very short list. Leonard Williams and Amari Cooper. Both of which could be considered a luxery. I think you'd have to go Williams.

---

Did you really just compare fowler to Clemons?


Fowler to me is a lot like suggs.


The person doing his best Clemons impersonation in this draft is Shane ray.

 

People were questioning Fowler's based on his measurables. All I'm saying is, based on measurables, Fowler's is good enough. It's not eye popping like Beasley, but it's good enough.

---

...because the ref called offensive holding.

 

So every time Ray got stonewalled, it was a hold?

---

i know, I already wrote up all of this in defense of Fowler a couple of times, too. If it is true that a lot of UDFA level athletes like Clemons was can be successful as a LEO, perhaps the position is kind of like the way the Seahawks/Gus Bradley late round mold of CB is, and we can just ignore the position until day 3 and find a quality fit. Who knows. 

 

This was something I thought about back when Gregory (who I really wasn't that high on) was the #1 mocked guy to us. Just look at how the team has managed to get production out of Branch, Davis, and even Chris Smith in his limited time last year. That said, we have no need at QB and there's not a T worth the pick. 

 

And while we can make a case for WR, even that is not that big of a need given what we invested on it last season.

 

So that leaves DE...

---