Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Sign Alex Mack, Trade for Joe Thomas?

#41

Quote:Marks is already getting paid what he's getting paid so we don't have a choice. To get Mack to opt out of his extremely lucrative Browns contract we would have to give him yet another raise in what will be his age 30 season.


Do we want to give out the biggest center contract in history to a guy who is now over 30 coming off a very average season, just for the hope that he can return to the form he had when he was 28? There's a whole lot of downside without much upside if you go about treating free agency in that way.


But he is different and I know his name!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

Quote:Sticking with Wiz and drafting a mid round center is a sensible option.
 

I was not inferring your statement to stick with Wiz.  

Reply

#43

Would rather sign Kelechi Osemele, who play play LG or LT fairly well.

 

I usually mock Mack to the Jags, but that is more to do with the mutual interest the two have shown each other in the past.

 

Would also, put a feeler out on Okung.


Reply

#44

Quote:I was not inferring your statement to stick with Wiz.


The word "replace" must mean something different to other folks. Wiz as depth is not a bad idea.
Reply

#45

I thought my other posts clarified but I guess I was wrong.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46

Why give Cleveland a first rd pick for Joe when we can trade them Henne.
Reply

#47

Quote:Why give Cleveland a first rd pick for Joe when we can trade them Henne.


When they hire a raffle winner to be GM, you may be right.
Reply

#48

Quote:Would rather sign Kelechi Osemele, who play play LG or LT fairly well.


I usually mock Mack to the Jags, but that is more to do with the mutual interest the two have shown each other in the past.


Would also, put a feeler out on Okung.


Okung is the most injury prone tackle in the whole league.
Reply

#49

Quote:Why would sticking with the player who single-handedly cost us a win over the NFL's worst team make sense? The same thing happened the next week too. We can't have any more snaps over Blake's head. Wiz sucks. He is not a good blocker either.


I feel like the 2nd one you are talking about was more on Blake than Wiz, assuming you're talking about the clots game. Yeah the ball wasn't in his bread basket, but it wasn't over his head either. It was still a very catchable snap that Blake got his hands on but the ball slipped off of his fingers.


I'll take an upgrade over Wiz if one reasonably presents itself, but I wouldn't be overly concerned if we had to re-sign him because of a lack of other options. He's good enough.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#50

Quote:Would rather sign Kelechi Osemele, who play play LG or LT fairly well.

 

I usually mock Mack to the Jags, but that is more to do with the mutual interest the two have shown each other in the past.

 

Would also, put a feeler out on Okung.
Osmele I'd be cool with at left guard, assuming Cann shifts inside to center. Even if Cann doesn't move, Osmele would still be an upgrade worth looking into, with Cann becoming a very solid insurance policy alongside Shatley and Bowanko.

 

Wouldn't touch Okung. He's injury prone and he's really not all that much better than Joeckel, if he's better at all.

Reply

#51

Nope. Too much money for a declining Mack and that 2 round pick is too sweet to trade away.


Reply

#52

Quote:Osmele I'd be cool with at left guard, assuming Cann shifts inside to center. Even if Cann doesn't move, Osmele would still be an upgrade worth looking into, with Cann becoming a very solid insurance policy alongside Shatley and Bowanko.

 

Wouldn't touch Okung. He's injury prone and he's really not all that much better than Joeckel, if he's better at all.
 

Apparently Osemele filled in for Monroe quiet well for the Ravens as well. He could kind of kill to birds with one stone by filling the LG spot or sliding to LT if Joeckel has flashbacks of the Houston game.

Reply

#53

Quote:Apparently Osemele filled in for Monroe quiet well for the Ravens as well.
Given how Monroe's played in Baltimore, blocking someone might be considered filling in quite well.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#54

Quote:No thanks. Wiz was just as good as Mack last year outside of the fluky bad snaps.


Dont know what games you were watching.
Reply

#55

Quote:Marks had a terrible season coming off injury, but he is on our team, so he will be just fine.


Mack had a terrible season coming off injury, but he isn't on our team, so he is done. Career over.


Aren't you use to that by now lol?
Reply

#56

Quote:Osmele I'd be cool with at left guard, assuming Cann shifts inside to center. Even if Cann doesn't move, Osmele would still be an upgrade worth looking into, with Cann becoming a very solid insurance policy alongside Shatley and Bowanko.


Wouldn't touch Okung. He's injury prone and he's really not all that much better than Joeckel, if he's better at all.
Agreed
Reply

#57
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2016, 12:39 AM by Dumptruck.)

Quote:Dont know what games you were watching.

Ah just every Browns and Jags game this past season.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#58

Quote:I'll apologize ahead of time for this not (likely) being a quality thread. In fact, the title pretty much says it all.

 
I have yet to read a single post of yours that lends anything of substance to this forum. At least you're starting to realize it.

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 




Reply

#59
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2016, 07:15 PM by Treestone Ice.)

Quote:I have yet to read a single post of yours that lends anything of substance to this forum. At least you're starting to realize it.
Feel better now?


After 21000 plus posts, I would think you would've been able to figure out what the ignore function was all about.
Reply

#60

Quote:Feel better now?


After 21000 plus posts, I would think you would've been able to figure out what the ignore function was all about.
Would it sadden you too much to know that you're just not worth the effort?

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 




Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!