Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
If a "franchise QB prospect" is available at 4- the Cowboys will take him according to Stephen Jones

#1

This is great news for the Jags

 

http://www.star-telegram.com/sports/nfl/...89982.html

 

 


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Hopefully there are atleast two franchise QBs in this draft. Hello Bosa, Jack or Ramsey.


Reply

#3

Would not surprise me. Romo is on lifesupport. I will be very shocked if a QB and Tunsil don't go in the top 4. This leaves us with Jack, Bosa, or Ramsey. Any would be welcome additions to our team
Reply

#4

Quote:Would not surprise me. Romo is on lifesupport. I will be very shocked if a QB and Tunsil don't go in the top 4. This leaves us with Jack, Bosa, or Ramsey. Any would be welcome additions to our team
 

Its simply the right decision to make, San Diego should be considering a QB as well. Franchise QB's trump every other position, that's why we took Blake (a developmental QB with crazy upside) over Khalil Mack and the other studs on the board in 2014.

Reply

#5

Hmm I don't think so.


I think the Cowboys will be all about winning now with Romo and will draft anyone but a QB or lineman.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:Its simply the right decision to make, San Diego should be considering a QB as well. Franchise QB's trump every other position, that's why we took Blake (a developmental QB with crazy upside) over Khalil Mack and the other studs on the board in 2014.


Its different when you already have franchise QBs and are drafting in a weak QB class though no?
Reply

#7

Quote:Hmm I don't think so.


I think the Cowboys will be all about winning now with Romo and will draft anyone but a QB or lineman.
 

Winning now? That team isn't very good, they're not a "player" away, they're several players away.

Reply

#8
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2016, 01:23 PM by JackCity.)

Quote:Winning now? That team isn't very good, they're not a "player" away, they're several players away.

Its easily a playoff team with Romo healthy. Best line in the league ,Dez, and a very underrated defense that did extremely well considering how bad the offense was. They are a good team.
Reply

#9
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2016, 01:37 PM by jagforlife85.)

Quote:Its easily a playoff team with Romo healthy. Best line in the league ,Dez, and a very underrated defense that did extremely well considering how bad the offense was. They are a good team.
 

I'm sorry I just don't think that Cowboys team (even with a healthy Romo) is that good, they're a mess on defense, they can't stop the run and struggle rushing the passer, they'll struggle even more rushing the passer next year as Hardy isn't returning, to make matters worse the secondary is garbage as well. There are simply too many holes to fill for that team to be a "true" SB contender, and even if they shored those holes, Romo is always a "hit" away from breaking a collarbone. They'd be better off in the long-term taking a franchise QB prospect at 4, allowing themselves to compete for 10-15 years as opposed to going "all in" in 2016-2017. If they pass on a potential franchise QB this year (Houston in 2014) when will they be in position to select one again in the future? You always select a franchise QB prospect if you don't have one on the current roster, or if the QB you have is in the twilight of his career.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Quote:Hmm I don't think so.


I think the Cowboys will be all about winning now with Romo and will draft anyone but a QB or lineman.


Im of different thinking. They are in a position to draft a qb and have them ride the pine for 2-4 years. They may not pick this high again especially if Romo can stay healthy for at least 12 games over the next 2-3 seasons.
Reply

#11

Quote:I'm sorry I just don't think that Cowboys team (even with a healthy Romo) is that good, they're a mess on defense, they can't stop the run and struggle rushing the passer, they'll struggle even more rushing the passer next year as Hardy isn't returning, to make matters worse the secondary is garbage as well. There are simply too many holes to fill for that team to be a "true" SB contender, and even if they shored those holes, Romo is always a "hit" away from breaking a collarbone. They'd be better off in the long-term taking a franchise QB prospect at 4, allowing themselves to compete for 10-15 years as opposed to going "all in" in 2016-2017. If they pass on a potential franchise QB this year (Houston in 2014) when will they be in position to select one again in the future? You always select a franchise QB prospect if you don't have one on the current roster, or if the QB you have is in the twilight of his career.
The part in bold is absolutely correct.

 

Question is whether Dallas perceives a franchise QB is in this draft.

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

#12

Quote:I'm sorry I just don't think that Cowboys team (even with a healthy Romo) is that good, they're a mess on defense, they can't stop the run and struggle rushing the passer, they'll struggle even more rushing the passer next year as Hardy isn't returning, to make matters worse the secondary is garbage as well. There are simply too many holes to fill for that team to be a "true" SB contender, and even if they shored those holes, Romo is always a "hit" away from breaking a collarbone. They'd be better off in the long-term taking a franchise QB prospect at 4, allowing themselves to compete for 10-15 years as opposed to going "all in" in 2016-2017. If they pass on a potential franchise QB this year (Houston in 2014) when will they be in position to select one again in the future? You always select a franchise QB prospect if you don't have one on the current roster, or if the QB you have is in the twilight of his career.


They are a good team with Room healthy which obviously is a big question mark these days. I agree defense is mess and it needs reinforcements badly.


Its a very weak QB class and I think the Cowboys would be better off both now and in the future by drafting defense with the 1st round pick.
Reply

#13

Quote:The part in bold is absolutely correct.

 

Question is whether Dallas perceives a franchise QB is in this draft.
 

Great question, I think most teams will view Carson Wentz and Jared Goff as franchise QB type prospects, I think it's a forgone conclusion that Wentz is going to the Browns at 2 (unless a team trades up to 1 and selects him) as he clearly has the highest upside of any QB in this draft. The question is does San Diego consider Goff at 3? Goff makes sense in San Diego and Dallas as both teams don't play in inclement weather much, that's the only knock on Goff. He has smallish hands and above average arm strength.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2016, 02:41 PM by jagforlife85.)

Quote:They are a good team with Room healthy which obviously is a big question mark these days. I agree defense is mess and it needs reinforcements badly.


Its a very weak QB class and I think the Cowboys would be better off both now and in the future by drafting defense with the 1st round pick.
 

I understand where you're coming from but the future isn't guaranteed, the only guarantee the Cowboys have is they possess the 4th overall pick in the 2016 NFL draft, if there's a QB they feel can develop into a franchise type guy I believe they'll take him. There are only two questions, do the Cowboys feel there's a franchise type QB in this draft? And will that QB (QB's) be available at 4? San Diego is in a similar position, it wouldn't surprise me if a QB was selected at both 2 and 3.


Reply

#15

Quote:They are a good team with Room healthy which obviously is a big question mark these days. I agree defense is mess and it needs reinforcements badly.


Its a very weak QB class and I think the Cowboys would be better off both now and in the future by drafting defense with the 1st round pick.


It's actually a really strong QB class
Reply

#16

Quote:It's actually a really strong QB class
 

I agree, Wenz, Goff, Lynch, Cook, Hackeberg, Cardale Jones, none of these guys are perfect but they all have a big upside.

Reply

#17

Quote:I understand where you're coming from but the future isn't guaranteed, the only guarantee the Cowboys have is they possess the 4th overall pick in the 2016 NFL draft, if there's a QB they feel can develop into a franchise type guy I believe they'll take him. There are only two questions, do the Cowboys feel there's a franchise type QB in this draft? And will that QB (QB's) be available at 4? San Diego is in a similar position, it wouldn't surprise me if a QB was selected at both 2 and 3.


Yeah I suppose you just can't count on Romo to stay healthy anymore so maybe a new QB to groom or step in if he gets injured would be best?


I don't know,my gut instinct is the Cowboys go defense and hope Romo stays healthy,if he doesn't they'll likely have a top 5 pick next year too,with much better QBs.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:It's actually a really strong QB class


I wouldn't agree.
Reply

#19

Quote:Yeah I suppose you just can't count on Romo to stay healthy anymore so maybe a new QB to groom or step in if he gets injured would be best?


I don't know,my gut instinct is the Cowboys go defense and hope Romo stays healthy,if he doesn't they'll likely have a top 5 pick next year too,with much better QBs.
This.  Plus, wouldn't that be the smart thing to do?  If the offense struggles, you shouldnt have to trade up that far if its a repeat season in terms of W/L if you value the top QB in 2017. 

Season Tix, Section 409

2023 and still counting.....SB will finally be ours soon enough.
TLaw aka 'the prince that was promised' supporter.
Reply

#20

Quote:This. Plus, wouldn't that be the smart thing to do? If the offense struggles, you shouldnt have to trade up that far if its a repeat season in terms of W/L if you value the top QB in 2017.


I thought the QB class for 2017 was a lot stronger for some reason. Its weak enough.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!