The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Allen Hurns will likely appear on the top 100 tomorrow
|
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Who will fall into # 90–81? Here’s a hint, brought to you by <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/CJDeuce_'>@CJDeuce_</a>, <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/hashtag/GusBradley?src=hash'>#GusBradley</a> & <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/hashtag/BillBelichick?src=hash'>#BillBelichick</a>. <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLTop100?src=hash'>#NFLTop100</a>
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Are you telling me that both of Blake's receivers made the top 100 and he don't make it? Wow Talking about the QB of a high-powered offense gets no credit. LOL
![]()
Quote:Hurns and Bortles tomorrow. Robinson lateri want to believe that but i think it going to be hurns and ivory tomorrow and i'm not sure blake makes the list and that is a crime within itself. ![]()
Bortles should make the list.
If Thomas wasn't hurt for the first 4 weeks, then he might have made it too. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Next year the top 100 will feature
Bortles Robinson Hurns Thomas Ramsey Jack Smith Fowler Gipson Linder
Not expecting to see Bortles on the list this year. If he progresses this year as we expect him to he should be on the list next year. Glad to see Hurns being recognized though. Gotta love when an undrafted guy makes a name for himself.
Quote:Not expecting to see Bortles on the list this year. If he progresses this year as we expect him to he should be on the list next year. Glad to see Hurns being recognized though. Gotta love when an undrafted guy makes a name for himself.why bortles don't make it but derek carr and teddy bridgewater do make the list? ![]() Quote:why bortles don't make it but derek carr and teddy bridgewater do make the list? Did Bridgewater seriously make the list?! We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Next year the top 100 will feature Chill
Quote:Did Bridgewater seriously make the list?!he's going to base on his team overall record ![]() Quote:Next year the top 100 will featureThat would be awesome but realistically not all the mouths can be fed on offense, it's hard for centers to get noticed unless they're on really good teams with notably good OLs, and Jack, Fowler, and Ramsey will all be rookies essentially. I think what we can realistically hope for is Bortles, A-Rob, Gipson, and one of Thomas/Hurns. "A man with no sauce is lost.
<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce."
Players probably think Bortles decision making is not good enough and his accuracy too sporadic. Although Carr turns over the ball a good bit too. But he also is 100.
"A man with no sauce is lost.
<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce." We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Players probably think Bortles decision making is not good enough and his accuracy too sporadic. Although Carr turns over the ball a good bit too. But he also is 100.Well blake has the same type of numbers as andrew luck but the media and players fawns over him. To me it just a case of a double standard. ![]()
Quote:why bortles don't make it but derek carr and teddy bridgewater do make the list? Has it been mentioned that Bridgewater is officially somewhere in the top 100? Because I seriously doubt he will be. I get that Bortles was a top 5 fantasy QB last year but that is one of the failings of fantasy football. It focuses on the statline without any context. Bortles not only led the league in INTs with 18, he also led the league in INTs inside the 40s (i.e. scoring position) with 10. That's 10 times last year he either took essentially guaranteed points off the board for us or put the opponent in FG range and gave our shaky defense a very short field. Those INTs contributed significantly to several losing efforts. If our defense had been better and had we won a few more games, I think the league would view Bortles' 2015 season in a more favorable light even with those interceptions as bad as some of them were. Bortles has provided the most exciting QB play this team has seen in years if not ever, but he's gotta clean up the boneheaded mistakes he makes at the precisely wrong times if he wants to be in the top 100 let alone be considered elite. I think he has a good chance of being able to do that. Carr was ranked 100 and it's probably questionable that he should have made it. He had a similar season to what Bortles had but his team overall was stronger and they were more competitive and won more games which probably helped him.
Quote:Chill I've already explained my enthusiasm. I've been a fan since day one. Yall can catch up bc I ain't chilling. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.