You make new threads about BB5 like every single day...we get it, you're in love with him, and that's okay.  To each their own...I don't judge.

---

Have you seen my baseball?

lol. ok. Was just trying to give some on this board some inside information. I guess most don't care. I'll go back to talking about the #26 YEARLY defense then. 

 

nobody cares about your insight info.  Go wank off to your Blake posters for the 4th time today.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

nobody cares about your insight info.  Go wank off to your Blake posters for the 4th time today.

 

I believe statistically I bring more to this board than anyone. 

---

I just really fail to see why it is so important to write off a QB was had decent success just one year ago despite having some of the worst coaching in league history.

 

He also seems willing acknowledge his faults, very directly, to the media, and is not being a jerk about it, and is taking action.

---

I just really fail to see why it is so important to write off a QB was had decent success just one year ago despite having some of the worst coaching in league history.

 

He also seems willing acknowledge his faults, very directly, to the media, and is not being a jerk about it, and is taking action.

I have not done that quite yet. I defended him in the thread where it is being questioned as to if he is an alcoholic. I would love to see him return to at least last years level of play. We would be 5-2 if he was there. He isn't close unfortunately.

 

His struggles are real and he is failing to make even the most basic plays and reads consistently. That cannot be denied. At this point everyone is just jabbing at SCJ because of his comedic defense of all things Bortles.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

I didn't even have to guess who started this lame [BAD WORD REMOVED] thread.


Gawd, I just hope they cut him soon so you can run off to some other team's unsuspecting message board and inundate them with this daily trash.

---

I believe statistically I bring more to this board than anyone.

You need a lot higher level statistical courses than what the material you present suggests you have had.


The statistics you present are at a very basic level, and they always miss GIANT factors of importance that would affect the overall output of your "data".


If you've had higher level courses, I apologize. But, if that's the case, you probably need to go back and re-learn/refresh yourself.

---

I have no problem with Bortles. Has he regressed? Yes. Can he get better? Most definitely. Will he under this coaching staff? Probably not.

---

Let's Get Em!!!! Go Jags!

I believe statistically I bring more to this board than anyone. 

I am a useless clown playing a broken record of gibberish. 

Fixed. 

---

I have no problem with Bortles. Has he regressed? Yes. Can he get better? Most definitely. Will he under this coaching staff? Probably not.

This is how MANY of us feel. For some reason, that's apparently not enough to the blathering OP. 

 

It's starting to be annoying. 

---

You need a lot higher level statistical courses than what the material you present suggests you have had.


The statistics you present are at a very basic level, and they always miss GIANT factors of importance that would affect the overall output of your "data".


If you've had higher level courses, I apologize. But, if that's the case, you probably need to go back and re-learn/refresh yourself.

 

My statistics are the stats scouts use. 

 

It's hilarious that MOST on this board actually think the defense has been "good" this year.

---

My statistics are the stats scouts use.


It's hilarious that MOST on this board actually think the defense has been "good" this year.

The scouts use different stats than we do?


Is there a stat that shows Blake throwing behind his receivers or into triple coverage?

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

This is how MANY of us feel. For some reason, that's apparently not enough to the blathering OP. 

 

It's starting to be annoying. 

 

Starting?

---

The scouts use different stats than we do?


Is there a stat that shows Blake throwing behind his receivers or into triple coverage?

Of course there is. Bortles leads the league in them.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

My statistics are the stats scouts use. 

 

It's hilarious that MOST on this board actually think the defense has been "good" this year.

 

It's hilarious that you would lie to try to enhance your point.

---

Of course there is. Bortles leads the league in them.

 

Bortles INT % will be dropped for the 3rd year straight by the end of the year. I'm willing to bet anyone hard cash at end of season.

 

2014- 3.6%

2015- 3.0%

2016- 3.1% (Just came off game with 54 attempts and 0 INTs)

 

 

Farve had a 3.3 INT% his entire career and was MVP type player. 

 

It must help to have a good team around you.

---

Bortles is terrible give it up.   Tebow 2.0 with less heart.

---

My statistics are the stats scouts use. 

 

It's hilarious that MOST on this board actually think the defense has been "good" this year.

 

Do you have a statistic to back that up?

 

I'm certainly not seeing it.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Bortles is terrible give it up.   Tebow 2.0 with less heart.

 

Tebow was a 48% passer. Bortles is improving to 60% now. Love these non scouts.

 

I wish Bortles had Tebow's Super Bowl winning 16 ppg defense and not a 28 ppg cesspool defense.

---

Tebow was a 48% passer. Bortles is improving to 60% now. Love these non scouts.

 

I wish Bortles had Tebow's Super Bowl winning 16 ppg defense and not a 28 ppg cesspool defense.

 

lol "improving to 60% now" 

 

wow, what an improvement!  I guess passing the ball to TJ Yeldon 10x in one game sure does wonders to your completion percentage!

\

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>