If there is a Muslim ban.... why not ban India? One of the largest Muslim populations in the world?

 

I wonder....

 

Are people really so obtuse they don't get it.... this is a temporary stoppage on new visas from particular nations overrun with ISIS.

 

Also.. Obama halted for 6 months immigration from Iraq for similar reasons.

Also Obama made this list of countries.

 

stop your whining and hand wringing over every thing this man does and let this country get better.

Jesus... the last 8 years have been awful enough just being Jaguar fans....

 

If every Muslim on earth resides in the 7 countries listed on the travel ban, then YES, it is a Muslim ban. 

---

If there is a Muslim ban.... why not ban India? One of the largest Muslim populations in the world?


I wonder....


Are people really so obtuse they don't get it.... this is a temporary stoppage on new visas from particular nations overrun with ISIS.


Also.. Obama halted for 6 months immigration from Iraq for similar reasons.

Also Obama made this list of countries.


stop your whining and hand wringing over every thing this man does and let this country get better.

Jesus... the last 8 years have been awful enough just being Jaguar fans....

Except Obama didn't detain legal permanent residents.

---

Except Obama didn't detain legal permanent residents.

 

Who is detained right now?

---

One has to at least be curious as to the nature of travel for some that are here in the US based on asylum and go back to these same areas to visit. Why is it ok for a legal permanent resident to also go and come back from these areas that others are claiming is too dangerous to live? With or without this newer immigration EO, that seem like flags to me.

---

One has to at least be curious as to the nature of travel for some that are here in the US based on asylum and go back to these same areas to visit. Why is it ok for a legal permanent resident to also go and come back from these areas that others are claiming is too dangerous to live? With or without this newer immigration EO, that seem like flags to me.

 

Agreed, and it shouldn't be. Green card holders should also be extensively vetted when returning from these nations. I also wouldn't object to citizens who visit these specific nations who aren't sponsored by a business to get extensive vetting when returning.

---

I also wouldn't object to citizens who visit these specific nations who aren't sponsored by a business to get extensive vetting when returning.

 

NO, the right to privacy and unrestricted travel is already to strained by our current system.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

NO, the right to privacy and unrestricted travel is already to strained by our current system.

 

They are most likely already put on some sort of watchlist by FBI or CIA, anyway. At least I believe the San Bernadino husband was.

---

They are most likely already put on some sort of watchlist by FBI or CIA, anyway. At least I believe the San Bernadino husband was.

 

I'm sure, I struggle with the idea that the government has a right to know where you as a citizen are traveling and why.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

They are most likely already put on some sort of watchlist by FBI or CIA, anyway. At least I believe the San Bernadino husband was.

Customs already flags you before and upon entry. If you aren't tied to official government travel, expect the strong possibility of legal harassment.

---

I'm sure, I struggle with the idea that the government has a right to know where you as a citizen are traveling and why.

Even scarier is that anytime you travel on a passport, customs has the right to search all your electronic devices and communications within them.

---

Even scarier is that anytime you travel on a passport, customs has the right to search all your electronic devices and communications within them.

 

Good luck getting through my 7 layers of encryption.

---

Good luck getting through my 7 layers of encryption.

 

"Give us the password citizen" will be the new "Your papers", 4th Amendment be damned.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Good luck getting through my 7 layers of encryption.

They use your login credentials, legally. They don't even need probable cause. If you refuse they will confiscate and there is a strong possibility you aren't getting back. It's crazy.

---

"Give us the password citizen" will be the new "Your papers", 4th Amendment be damned.

 

They can't legally compel anyone to provide passwords (yet), though I do suppose they could confiscate your electronic device.

 

Good thing I am not traveling to Pakistan for leisure anytime soon.

---

Except Obama didn't detain legal permanent residents.

Oh.... did Trump?

Must have missed the part where American citizens were being detained.

 

 

Cuz I know plenty of illegals who are "permanent residents".

---

Agreed, and it shouldn't be. Green card holders should also be extensively vetted when returning from these nations. I also wouldn't object to citizens who visit these specific nations who aren't sponsored by a business to get extensive vetting when returning.

I agree with this exec. order...

 

but it's already a slippery slope before you tell American citizens "hey if you travel, expect Hell to get back in"

 

However... to the point you are making, I think, why would Joe America want to go travel to Iraq, Syria, or Yemen.......

if you want to be around all that right now, it certainly would raise some questions.

 

Now a lot of American citizens are Muslim and many want to travel back home to visit family or the Mecca or whatever... so this is why we couldn't do that. Then essentially you are ACTUALLY targeting Muslims, rather than the radical countries we've targeted now.

---

Even scarier is that anytime you travel on a passport, customs has the right to search all your electronic devices and communications within them.

 

Good luck getting through my 7 layers of encryption.

I mean.... you ever heard of this guy named Snowden? An agency called the NSA?

The Patriot Act?

PRISM?


You got a smart phone? They can get it.

You driving down the street? They can see you.

Your information is no longer safe... unless you keep it off the phone, cpu, etc.

 

They'll tell you you can block this or do that...take out your battery, turn off GPS....

but once it's electronic it is never safe and never gone.

 

Unless you guys get some of that bleachbit that worked so well for Killary  :teehee:  :woot:

---

Except Obama didn't detain legal permanent residents.

By the very nature of the DHS and border security, people from every category have been detained on a daily basis. This is not new. And guess what, people have been barred from entry on a permanent and temporary basis as well and once again, just about daily. In fact, in FY2016 over 800,000 were inadmissible or deported. Actual border arrest were over 400,000. Pretty sure there was a lot of detainment going on!

 

https://www.dhs.gov/data-statistics

---

They can't legally compel anyone to provide passwords (yet), though I do suppose they could confiscate your electronic device.

 

Good thing I am not traveling to Pakistan for leisure anytime soon.

Actually you'll end up in a county lock up indefinitely on a Contempt charge until you comply.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Who is detained right now?

 

 

http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/nobody-...1791859772

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.