Hundreds of Scientists Say Climate Change Is Not Science, CO2 Is Benign
 

Hundreds of scientists and policy experts sent a letter to President Donald Trump asking him to withdraw from a major United Nations environmental treaty [UN Convention on Climate Change aka UNFCCC] ratified during the Bush administration.

 

http://www.independentsentinel.com/hundr...t-science/

---

Anyone worth their salt knows CO2 is essential for plant life.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Hundreds of thousands say it is real.

---

Anyone worth their salt knows CO2 is essential for plant life.

LOL

---

Anyone worth their salt knows CO2 is essential for plant life.

Who the hell ever argued that simpleton?

---

Hundreds of thousands say it is real.

 

The majority of "scientists" used to believe the world was flat.

 

So...

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Who the hell ever argued that simpleton

 

 

CO2 never has been, isn't, and never will be the thermostat switch for planet Earth.

 

It's science.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

CO2 never has been, isn't, and never will be the thermostat switch for planet Earth.


It's science.

It's pathological

---

Drifter did it again.

 

He conned me into clicking on one of his crazy tin foil hat websites again.

 

Congrats, pal, you got me again.  Do you get a subsidy from these guys for clicks?

---

Drifter did it again.


He conned me into clicking on one of his crazy tin foil hat websites again.


Congrats, pal, you got me again. Do you get a subsidy from these guys for clicks?

He's getting Some kickback

---

Some people didn't comprehend the article. The real issue is this idea that human pollutants are affecting the climate is pretty much a global scientific belief. Scientists from France, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Australia, et. al. have the same conclusions but have zero interest in American politics. Yet Americans believe this idea is all politically motivated. Go figure.

 

I am pretty sure if I, and my neighbors, take our household trash and throw it in our lake it's not good for the lake. Likewise, if we throw our industrial garbage in the atmosphere it's not good for the atmosphere.

 

Regards...................the Chiefjag

---

I approach these stories from a slightly different angle. I am not a big fan of the UNFCCC stuff because I think there are serious obstacles to successful implementation and we should explore alternative avenues of climate modification that are more efficient and scalable. Instead of focusing our efforts on cap and trade, carbon taxes, etc, I feel we would be better served by working on development of better carbon sequestration techniques. 

---

<p class="bbc_left">Education is the cheap defense of nations. - Edmund Burke

<p class="bbc_left"> 

<p class="bbc_left">Or is it from Burke? I tried finding the source, and looked through some of his writings, no luck. Anybody with google-fu got a citation of the source?

Carbon taxes are about control and population reduction. They may want to 'save the planet,' but not for you and me.

---

Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 

Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.

 

Some scientists are also predicting a mini ice age now by 2030. 

 

From 2014:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/24...45248.html

 

From four months ago in 2016:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/72...r-activity

 

That's the problem with the science communities. Just like the religious communities. Each different branch, speaker, preacher and devotee has their own little pockets and structures of beliefs. You can find people all around the world divided on this idea of Global Warming and Climate Change. 

 

Some say it's because humanity sucks. Some say it's because the Sun has certain times of the year where it will have little flare ups which that alone causes the issue. Some say it's just a natural, inevitable cycle that will reoccur from time to time like it always has. 

 

My biggest problem with all of this. And I'll explain which camp I fall in here in a minute. Brace yourselves. Winter is coming. 

 

1. Humanity has only been able to track, trace and record temperatures on our planet since the 1850's. So, this idea that you can somehow take just maybe 160 some odd years of data and somehow think the world is ending is asinine.

 

Just because someone gets paid millions of dollars to go out of their way to prove their specific theory or point doesn't always mean they're right. 

 

2. There's evidence of misleading information, manipulation of data and money being involved for political reasons or gain. 

 

http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/19/more-c...mate-data/

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/en...-ever.html

 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/...e-reaction

 

SO, how are we supposed to make heads or tails of all of this?

 



 

I'll just point to ancient history. Not a religious man myself. But there's ancient stories of great floods, disease and famine along with sunken ruins that show you that we're ultimately just a tick on an elephant's [BAD WORD REMOVED] compared to the Earth as human beings. And, climate change, it's just a common cycle and a common feature of what our planet inevitably goes through. Change is inevitable. Will it happen? Sure. It's happened before. It'll certainly happen again. Will humanity survive? Maybe, maybe not. 

 

Until then. Live your life. 

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

Some people didn't comprehend the article. The real issue is this idea that human pollutants are affecting the climate is pretty much a global scientific belief. Scientists from France, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Australia, et. al. have the same conclusions but have zero interest in American politics. Yet Americans believe this idea is all politically motivated. Go figure.

 

I am pretty sure if I, and my neighbors, take our household trash and throw it in our lake it's not good for the lake. Likewise, if we throw our industrial garbage in the atmosphere it's not good for the atmosphere.

 

Regards...................the Chiefjag

Easy with that common sense approach.  

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Some people didn't comprehend the article. The real issue is this idea that human pollutants are affecting the climate is pretty much a global scientific belief. Scientists from France, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Australia, et. al. have the same conclusions but have zero interest in American politics. Yet Americans believe this idea is all politically motivated. Go figure.

 

I am pretty sure if I, and my neighbors, take our household trash and throw it in our lake it's not good for the lake. Likewise, if we throw our industrial garbage in the atmosphere it's not good for the atmosphere.

 

Regards...................the Chiefjag

Now Chief...You know better than to throw common sense and logic into a post on this board

---

Tucker just CRUSHED Bill Nye on climate change. LMBO.

---

You seem to have a lot invested in disputing climate change. Hope you are getting a cheque for your troubles.

---

You seem to have a lot invested in disputing climate change. Hope you are getting a cheque for your troubles.

Don't get mad at me because a fake scientist got TUCKED.

---

Don't get mad at me because a fake scientist got TUCKED.

What makes somebody a fake scientist? Are using a trump buzzword?


You really are scarily easy to control.

---