The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
So, with Campbell and Church expected to sign...
|
This topic was side-tracking various draft threads, so I felt it needed it's own thread.
Presuming these two sign, the needs for Jamal Adams and Solomon Thomas. I have heard you can never have too many pass rushers, but we already have Fowler as basically an extra. They still might pick one of these two, but taking them out of play who does this leave? You have...
'02
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Its obvious its between fournette r adams..
In the end i want the player with the most impact.. That would be fournette as he will come in and take over on day 1..
I am still of the mind that it would be really hard for the Jags to screw this pick up, as long as it isn't a RB.
Allen - were not taking a rotational DT at 4
Lattimore - ok Hooker - ok Fournette - starting to look more and more likely as the FAs roll in but please god no Mccaffrey - good player but not happening Watson - were locked in on Blake Osweiler John Ross - was never the best receiver in this class and his knees are mangled OJ Howard - sounds good Forrest Lamp - sounds good
If you take those two out the only realistic option left is Fournette. It's pretty telegraphed at this point.
I'd rather have Solomon Thomas but it boggles my mind how this fanbase has picked up this deep hatred for Fournette at 4. "A man with no sauce is lost.
<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce." We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:I am still of the mind that it would be really hard for the Jags to screw this pick up, as long as it isn't a RB.It looks like a RB, if its not a RB its probably Hooker or another CB.
I'd say the likelihood of Fournette being the pick now is like 85%.
"A man with no sauce is lost.
<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce."
I believe all signs lead to one of two scenarios.
1. We draft Leonard Fournette at #4. This almost seems like a done deal. 2. We trade down, accumulate draft picks in 2018 in order to set ourselves up to get a franchise QB in that draft. By trading down, we could add an OG like Forest Lamp if we miss out on Zeitler in free agency or we could draft our LT of the future like Ryan Ramczyk and then select a RB in the 2nd or 3rd round. Pick your poison. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Lattimore, Lamp/Ramczyk, Hooker, Fournette/Cook and Howard all seem to be a bit more in play at #4 than they were 24 hours ago.
I honestly have no clue what they'll do at 4. Trading down just keeps looking better and better though. Quote:Trading down just keeps looking better and better though.Unfortunately the reasons trading down keeps looking better and better is the same reason it is also looking less and less likely. And it already looked very unlikely.
Fournette or Adams?
Adams plays SS, the spot we just signed Church to play. It narrows it down to Fournette, Lattimore, or Solomon Thomas most likely. There will be a couple risers I'm sure too. OJ Howard/Derek Barnett etc.
Think people who dislike LF need to dive in to his games and watch him. It does seem like he's the favorite at this point.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I'm fairly stuck on Marshon Lattimore at this point.
He was already considered a top five player in this draft, and his combine helped to solidify everything said about him... <p style="margin-left:40px;"> <p style="margin-left:40px;">Marshon Lattimore, Ohio State - 6' 0", 193 lbs, 4.36 40, 38 1/2 vert, 11' 0" broad <p style="margin-left:40px;"> Here's a good write-up on him calling him the next Stephen Gilmore... <p style="margin-left:40px;">https://www.fanragsports.com/nfl/marshon...the-draft/
'02
I prefer waiting for the first couple of days of FA to be over before answering, the only thing I'm sure I don't want is still a RB at 4 especially not with the current Oline (that's why waiting for FA scenario to be clearer).
Also, do you remember when Coughlin drafted Henderson and Stroud in back-to-back years? The two blossomed together as the Twin Towers absolutely dominating inside. We could do the same thing now with back-to-back stellar CBs.
'02
Man, how many times do I have to say a DB is not going top 4 before people believe me.
"A man with no sauce is lost.
<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce." We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Number of DBs that have went in the top 4 in the past 20 years: 0
"A man with no sauce is lost.
<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce." Quote:Number of DBs that have went in the top 4 in the past 20 years: 0 Cool |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.