I have been seeing a bunch of rumors.  So hypothetical. If the draft started like this.  Who then should we pick?  Or should we trade down?

 

1,Cleveland- Garrett

2. 49ers- Fournette

3. Chicago- Watson

4. Jaguars?

 

In this scenario.  A team could come up for Thomas, A safety, DT, or to grab a qb.  To jump over Jets.

---

Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags

Trade down.


If not Thomas or Allen.

---

I have been seeing a bunch of rumors. So hypothetical. If the draft started like this. Who then should we pick? Or should we trade down?


1,Cleveland- Garrett

2. 49ers- Fournette

3. Chicago- Watson

4. Jaguars?


In this scenario. A team could come up for Thomas, A safety, DT, or to grab a qb. To jump over Jets.

I think at this point I'm dead set on fournette and shifting to a power running team and drafting a QB and an olineman in rounds 2 and 3 not necessarily in that order. We have a good young defense and if we can control the clock a bit more and keep our D fresh I believe we can win a lot more games.

---

I think at this point I'm dead set on fournette and shifting to a power running team and drafting a QB and an olineman in rounds 2 and 3 not necessarily in that order. We have a good young defense and if we can control the clock a bit more and keep our D fresh I believe we can win a lot more games.

agreed

---

<p style="text-align:center;">

If we couldn't trade back I'm taking one of Howard, Lattimore, Adams, Hooker or McCaffrey.

---

I have been seeing a bunch of rumors.  So hypothetical. If the draft started like this.  Who then should we pick?  Or should we trade down?

 

1,Cleveland- Garrett

2. 49ers- Fournette

3. Chicago- Watson

4. Jaguars?

 

In this scenario.  A team could come up for Thomas, A safety, DT, or to grab a qb.  To jump over Jets.

 

 

While it doesn't change the situation here all that much, should the Bears go qb at #3 it will either be for Trubisky or Kizer. Trubisky is the top early pick in this draft, but Kizer is a prospect the Bears have intensely scouted and are clearly interested in.

---

'02

So, in this scenario...

1. Garrett
   
   
2. Fournette
   
   
3. Trubisky
   
   
4. ?
   
   

The only player I can see teams possibly trading up for is Solomon Thomas. Maybe the Bengal would bite.


 

Most likely the Jaguars don't get the value in a trade down that their looking for and have to make the pick. Why not take Solomon Thomas?

---

'02

So, in this scenario...

1. Garrett
   
   
2. Fournette
   
   
3. Trubisky
   
   
4. ?
   
   

The only player I can see teams possibly trading up for is Solomon Thomas. Maybe the Bengal would bite.


 

Most likely the Jaguars don't get the value in a trade down that their looking for and have to make the pick. Why not take Solomon Thomas?

THE Bears have shown zero interest in Mitch.  Due to lack of experience.

---

Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags

Thomas here is a no-brainer

---

THE Bears have shown zero interest in Mitch.  Due to lack of experience.

 

 

They haven't shown any interest in Watson either. If you disagree, then you'll have to provide a link to prove it. From what I'm looking at, they've only shown interest in Kizer and Kaaya.

---

'02

99.999999% chance the bears don't take a QB at 3 after signing Glennon to that contract.

---

Thomas

---

Trade down if not best available player Jamal Adams. Dude can play everything in the back-in

---

I stand corrected on Watson as the Bears recently did bring him in for a complete workout. The thing is, he basically choked putting that weak, erratic arm of his on display. After that workout, there's zero chance Watson is drafted in the top five.

---

'02