Too bad he has trouble getting past the LOS unless there is a gigantic hole in front of him.

Bingo, he's Todd Gurley 2.0. Those type of backs don't create yards, they get what's blocked for them.

---

I don't think you know what you're talking about.

We'll see. When draft season rolls around and the draftnicks start doing their grades I think you're going to be shocked on how close the top of the draft class is in terms of grades.

---

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

Trade back and pick McCaffery still sounds the best to me.

---

Bingo, he's Todd Gurley 2.0. Those type of backs don't create yards, they get what's blocked for them.

Gurley is a great back.  If their oline was just halfway decent he would be putting up numbers with the best in the league.

---

So to play along well add 2 "elite" prospects. Is this now the deepest draft ever?

 

I was kind of being sarcastic there as Allen is almost unanimously considered an elite prospect. From everything I hear about this class, it sounds like an average one. A few elite prospects, some really deep positions, and others without any real good prospects.

---

Hey, that's your choice and opinion. I'm sure there will be a GM who decides to do the opposite and that will be his choice.


I don't think the Cowboys are at home saying "Damn we could've had Howard in the 5th." Because of some dumb rule you've came up with.

If they had an ounce of intelligence they would, would you rather have Zeke or Jordan Howard and Jalen Ramsey?

---

Bingo, he's Todd Gurley 2.0. Those type of backs don't create yards, they get what's blocked for them.

 

Give Gurley an average line instead of the putrid one he has in Los Angeles and I believe you'll see a highly productive player. That said, I feel like these conversations would be better served in the NFL draft section instead of a topic about our opening at head coach.

---

If they had an ounce of intelligence they would, would you rather have Zeke or Jordan Howard and Jalen Ramsey?

I don't think anyone lives life thru hindsight. If we're playing that game, Howard would have probably gone top 10 if teams envisioned the production he put up this year.


It works both ways.

---

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

Bingo, he's Todd Gurley 2.0. Those type of backs don't create yards, they get what's blocked for them.

You have no clue what you are talking about.  In 2015 when LF was healthy he broke more tackles than any RB in college football lol  

---

Give Gurley an average line instead of the putrid one he has in Los Angeles and I believe you'll see a highly productive player. That said, I feel like these conversations would be better served in the NFL draft section instead of a topic about our opening at head coach.

Jagforlife85 is still trying to figure this football thing out

---

Trade back and pick McCaffery still sounds the best to me.

That would be my wish too but Dave dont like to trade back and McCaffery will most likely be gone when we pick in the 2nd

---

There are several prospects in this draft outside of Myles Garrett that are elite, especially on the defensive side of the ball. I think Cook is a fine player, but even if he grades evenly with a guy like Jon Allen, I'm taking Jon Allen everytime if both guys are on the board, and its not close

What position do you see Allen playing for us? Is he the "big end"??

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Jason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora

Tough day for Find D but their DC remains hot. Of 6 HC openings, all but JAX requested an interview. He'll work Mon on end-of-season...

5:36 PM - 8 Jan 2017

---

http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2017/1/8/14...nce-hiring

---

Give Gurley an average line instead of the putrid one he has in Los Angeles and I believe you'll see a highly productive player. That said, I feel like these conversations would be better served in the NFL draft section instead of a topic about our opening at head coach.

The fact of the matter is Gurley was severily out performed by his backup this year, a guy by the name of Benny Cunningham. It becomes pretty evident why he outperformed Gurley when you watch them play. Cunningham (while not as gifted athletically as Gurley) has the ability to make guys miss at the LOS, an attribute crucial to success at this level as giant running lanes are rare, this compensates for average line play and is what made Adrian Peterson so great. It's not just about having "speed and power", RB's have to be "creators" at this level, Gurley isn't a consistent creator. The advanced metrics also back up my argument as Gurley was one of the worst backs in the league at making guys miss.

---

What position do you see Allen playing for us? Is he the "big end"??

Gus is gone so I doubt there will be a "big end"

---

You have no clue what you are talking about. In 2015 when LF was healthy he broke more tackles than any RB in college football lol

I don't doubt his speed and power, I question his ability to make guys miss in small spaces and most importantly at the LOS. Both of which are crucial to success in the NFL, it doesn't matter how "big/fast/powerful" a back is if he can't create yards when yards aren't there. If the Jags decide to take a back that high (they won't) its Dalvin Cook and it's not close, as he's a guy who can create, accelerate, and run away from defenses.

---

The fact of the matter is Gurley was severily out performed by his backup this year, a guy by the name of Benny Cunningham. It becomes pretty evident why he outperformed Gurley when you watch them play. Cunningham (while not as gifted athletically as Gurley) has the ability to make guys miss at the LOS, an attribute crucial to success at this level as giant running lanes are rare, this compensates for average line play and is what made Adrian Peterson so great. It's not just about having "speed and power", RB's have to be "creators" at this level, Gurley isn't a consistent creator. The advanced metrics also back up my argument as Gurley was one of the worst backs in the league at making guys miss.

 

Cunningham had one game with more than 3 carries this season. I'd hardly call his grand total of 21 carries throughout the entire season a large enough sample size to make any sort of judgement on Cunningham or indictment on Gurley using them.

---

The fact of the matter is Gurley was severily out performed by his backup this year, a guy by the name of Benny Cunningham. It becomes pretty evident why he outperformed Gurley when you watch them play. Cunningham (while not as gifted athletically as Gurley) has the ability to make guys miss at the LOS, an attribute crucial to success at this level as giant running lanes are rare, this compensates for average line play and is what made Adrian Peterson so great. It's not just about having "speed and power", RB's have to be "creators" at this level, Gurley isn't a consistent creator. The advanced metrics also back up my argument as Gurley was one of the worst backs in the league at making guys miss.

LOL, you are not looking like you have the slightest clue about what you are talking about.  You are starting to just make stuff up.  Cunningham had 21 carries for the whole year and got 101 yards, on 2 of those runs he gained half of those yards.   LOL

---

I don't doubt his speed and power, I question his ability to make guys miss in small spaces and most importantly at the LOS. Both of which are crucial to success in the NFL, it doesn't matter how "big/fast/powerful" a back is if he can't create yards when yards aren't there. If the Jags decide to take a back that high (they won't) its Dalvin Cook and it's not close, as he's a guy who can create, accelerate, and run away from defenses.

Kinda like Yeldon?  lol.   This conversation is hilarious

---