Gabbert didn't outplay anybody in the preseason, his only good game was a ton of WR screen/PA Bootleg passes to the flat that had good YAC. Henne wasn't anything special either. 

 

OTA's, training camp. Scott showed nothing. It was surprising he even made the practice squad.

---

;

;

OTA's, training camp. Scott showed nothing. It was surprising he even made the practice squad.

How many consecutive weeks in TC was the "Play of the day" a Blaine Gabbert thrown INT. Once again, Scott was not given a shot with the 1's, except for Blackmon in preseason who dropped multiple passes from Scott. 

 

Scott may not have shown a lot, but he wasn't given a shot too in TC and in preseason he played with bums. 

---

Actually it was usually a defensive back dropping Matt Scott's passes.


Or catching them. Some of those too.

Why don't you stop hating on a guy who was surrounded with 3rd/4th stringers in the preseason. You have no clue how he would look with the starting offense.

---

Scott was among the worst passers in this past preseason, Tebow was more productive than him, thats not a good sign.

---

Fundamentals are the crutch of the talentless
;

;

How many consecutive weeks in TC was the "Play of the day" a Blaine Gabbert thrown INT. Once again, Scott was not given a shot with the 1's, except for Blackmon in preseason who dropped multiple passes from Scott. 

 

Scott may not have shown a lot, but he wasn't given a shot too in TC and in preseason he played with bums. 

 

And he was playing against bums and looked terrible.

---

To be honest at least Scott would be bad from being a raw rookie. He would have a chance to develope and has shown to be willing to throw the ball in the intermediate range.

 

He would have some excuse for INTs being a rook but somehow i dont think we'd see the shameful self sacks we've seen from Gabbert. Give him a chance with the 1s in practice and let him start 2 weeks. Next 2 weeks do the same for Stanzi. One week to get your feet wet and then the next to try and refine it.

---

To be honest at least Scott would be bad from being a raw rookie. He would have a chance to develope and has shown to be willing to throw the ball in the intermediate range.

 

He would have some excuse for INTs being a rook but somehow i dont think we'd see the shameful self sacks we've seen from Gabbert. Give him a chance with the 1s in practice and let him start 2 weeks. Next 2 weeks do the same for Stanzi. One week to get your feet wet and then the next to try and refine it.

 

Stanzi isn't even on the roster

---