(08-28-2022, 03:22 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote:

(08-28-2022, 03:01 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: The Kansas City airport is terrible. It was built in the early 70s and the design is not accepting, at all, of modern-day security measures. I understand they are currently building a new one. 
Charlotte has a nice USO center but the airport layout is a little haphazard.
Many people don't agree with me, but I think Atlanta is great. You can get anywhere in that airport within 15 minutes and the choice of eateries is unparalleled from anywhere I've ever been. 

Madrid's airport is HUGE. The terminal signage is little lacking as well.

Agree on Atlanta, unless it's under construction.  If so, a total nightmare.
I haven't been to KC SINCE the 70's, so it was prob state of the art then.
I've connected more thru Charlotte than any other airport, and have had some horrible experiences there.  Mostly about changed gates and having to run full gallop down the never ending Terminal E trying to get to the gate of a connecting flight in 10 min or less.  I'm not a fan of the layout there either.
I forgot to put Phoenix on my likes list.  Really pretty distant view of the mountains and city from there.

Probably wont experience Madrid in my lifetime cause the next trips to Europe will start by flying in to Paris, Zurich and Prague.  After that, it'll be all cars and trains.

When I was consulting and doing a lot of travel, Northwest was still in business.  I had some of my worst travel experiences ever flying through Detroit which was one of the main Northwest hubs.

I’ll tell you what I was impressed by…and it is very JIA sized…is Dallas Love.  They’ve done a lot of remodeling in there and it is a Southwest hub.  It’s nice when I do travel, as far as convenience, because I have two hubs within 35 minutes. It allows me to price shop.  As a matter of fact, I came up to PA on American this weekend and coming back in three weeks (for my wife’s reunion) on Southwest.

---