Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
***Official Chiefs @ Patriots Thursday Night Game Day Thread***

#61
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2017, 04:21 PM by flgatorsandjags.)

[Image: 21430071_1504293936351696_41661442398422...e=5A5B70AA]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#62

That means nothing. It is 100% coincidence.
Reply

#63

(09-08-2017, 06:08 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: That means nothing. It is 100% coincidence.

It's not a coincidence when you are the greatest of all time!
Reply

#64

Meh, week 1. Things change drastically over the course of the NFL season. It always does, every year. 

(Remember week 1 last season when the Jags played the Packers? Jags played them tough, with a legit chance to win near the end of the game. And, it could be argued that the Jags would've won without some egregious refereeing that day.) Anyway, how'd both those teams' seasons end up? Packers,, yeah they were good. Jags? heh

Barring any major key injuries (which could happen to any team, any time), the Patriots WILL be in the playoffs, most likely as a division winner home game. And, they WILL be a team that the other franchises will have to "deal with" if they want to get to the Superbowl. It's just reality.

Thing you can count on:
The Sun rises. The Sun sets. The sky is blue. The Patriots will be in contention during a playoff run.
Reply

#65

(09-09-2017, 12:41 PM)jagherd Wrote: Meh, week 1. Things change drastically over the course of the NFL season. It always does, every year. 

(Remember week 1 last season when the Jags played the Packers? Jags played them tough, with a legit chance to win near the end of the game. And, it could be argued that the Jags would've won without some egregious refereeing that day.) Anyway, how'd both those teams' seasons end up? Packers,, yeah they were good. Jags? heh

Barring any major key injuries (which could happen to any team, any time), the Patriots WILL be in the playoffs, most likely as a division winner home game. And, they WILL be a team that the other franchises will have to "deal with" if they want to get to the Superbowl. It's just reality.

Thing you can count on:
The Sun rises. The Sun sets. The sky is blue. The Patriots will be in contention during a playoff run.

I was only saying the Patriots are not guaranteed to win (or even play in) the Super Bowl because of a historical fun fact.

Yes, I do remember that. I also know we are better on both offense and defense than we were that day.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#66

(09-09-2017, 12:55 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(09-09-2017, 12:41 PM)jagherd Wrote: Meh, week 1. Things change drastically over the course of the NFL season. It always does, every year. 

(Remember week 1 last season when the Jags played the Packers? Jags played them tough, with a legit chance to win near the end of the game. And, it could be argued that the Jags would've won without some egregious refereeing that day.) Anyway, how'd both those teams' seasons end up? Packers,, yeah they were good. Jags? heh

Barring any major key injuries (which could happen to any team, any time), the Patriots WILL be in the playoffs, most likely as a division winner home game. And, they WILL be a team that the other franchises will have to "deal with" if they want to get to the Superbowl. It's just reality.

Thing you can count on:
The Sun rises. The Sun sets. The sky is blue. The Patriots will be in contention during a playoff run.

I was only saying the Patriots are not guaranteed to win (or even play in) the Super Bowl because of a historical fun fact.

Yes, I do remember that. I also know we are better on both offense and defense than we were that day.

^ Good post. I agree.

I wasn't replying to anyone's opinion in particular with  my post. I was just stating my own opinion about early season games as a whole and the Patriots in particular   (which most already understand and agree with themselves). 

I've heard Cris Collinsworth and Phil Simms on numerous occasions over the years state that September is the great "Fooler's Month"; meaning that the way the games work out in the first month, and which teams look good and those that look bad in September is not always what ends up being true in December. 



The Patriots will be there in the playoffs, if only for the fact that the AFCE does not look to have any other team to seriously push the Pats for a division title. It "could" happen though, you never know. I just don't see it right now.
Reply

#67

(09-09-2017, 01:31 PM)jagherd Wrote:
(09-09-2017, 12:55 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: I was only saying the Patriots are not guaranteed to win (or even play in) the Super Bowl because of a historical fun fact.

Yes, I do remember that. I also know we are better on both offense and defense than we were that day.

^ Good post. I agree.

I wasn't replying to anyone's opinion in particular with  my post. I was just stating my own opinion about early season games as a whole and the Patriots in particular   (which most already understand and agree with themselves). 

I've heard Cris Collinsworth and Phil Simms on numerous occasions over the years state that September is the great "Fooler's Month"; meaning that the way the games work out in the first month, and which teams look good and those that look bad in September is not always what ends up being true in December. 

The Patriots will be there in the playoffs, if only for the fact that the AFCE does not look to have any other team to seriously push the Pats for a division title. It "could" happen though, you never know. I just don't see it right now.

The only way New England does not make the playoffs is a catastrophic injury to Tom Brady. That was how they missed it in 2008.

I have not heard that term, but they are right. It happens every year.
Reply

#68

(09-09-2017, 01:47 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(09-09-2017, 01:31 PM)jagherd Wrote: ^ Good post. I agree.

I wasn't replying to anyone's opinion in particular with  my post. I was just stating my own opinion about early season games as a whole and the Patriots in particular   (which most already understand and agree with themselves). 

I've heard Cris Collinsworth and Phil Simms on numerous occasions over the years state that September is the great "Fooler's Month"; meaning that the way the games work out in the first month, and which teams look good and those that look bad in September is not always what ends up being true in December. 

The Patriots will be there in the playoffs, if only for the fact that the AFCE does not look to have any other team to seriously push the Pats for a division title. It "could" happen though, you never know. I just don't see it right now.

The only way New England does not make the playoffs is a catastrophic injury to Tom Brady. That was how they missed it in 2008.

I have not heard that term, but they are right. It happens every year.

Brady suffers a catastrophic injury every year?
Huh
Reply

#69

(09-10-2017, 11:33 AM)Monty Wrote:
(09-09-2017, 01:47 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: The only way New England does not make the playoffs is a catastrophic injury to Tom Brady. That was how they missed it in 2008.

I have not heard that term, but they are right. It happens every year.

Brady suffers a catastrophic injury every year?

Fooler's Month
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#70

FWIW, those 3 openers NE lost to go on SB runs were road games, not home games. Which for that team, makes a difference. They've been the best home team in the NFL for years.
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#71

(09-11-2017, 07:44 AM)mvannostran Wrote: FWIW, those 3 openers NE lost to go on SB runs were road games, not home games. Which for that team, makes a difference. They've been the best home team in the NFL for years.

The Patriots are fortunate that they are in a much weaker division than the Chiefs.  Barring the injury factor moving forward,  the Patriots should end up with a better record than the Chiefs despite what happened the other night.

Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!