The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
At least 27 dead in Texas shooting
|
(11-06-2017, 07:57 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: The 2nd Amendment says something entirely different than your premise that makes all the rest of what you said a violation of it. How is a lengthier waiting period and more thorough vetting of potential gun owners, a violation of the 2nd amendment? As a gun owner myself, I have no problem with this. If you have nothing to hide, you should have no problem waiting or purchasing a firearm. If you have something to hide, you shouldn't have a gun at all. It's common sense. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.