(12-06-2017, 04:07 AM)atburg Wrote:

(12-05-2017, 07:30 PM)JackCity Wrote: This is where you need to learn to compartmentalise. I'm really enjoying this year, enjoying Blake when he plays well AND looking forward to what's going to happen next year, especially with our QB situation.  Bortles has been below average this year, despite some good games and a good record.

I appreciate you calling me out for "grading your QBs with box scores" while also bringing up box scores as a reason for Kirk bring worse than Blake though. Very funny!

(12-05-2017, 07:37 PM)WhoYouBE Wrote: Anyone with football knowledge knows that Kirk is the much better QB - I dont need Football stats to tell me this; eye test pretty much tells every fan with common sense that he far superior than Blake is at every aspect of the game.

No way in hell is he 10 million a year better!


As far as box scores, I used game by game breakdowns for the numbers. Not the Monday paper.

See before you were just Blake was better. Now we  have the backtrack where you admit Cousins is better but you don't agree on the price. We're getting there. What do you think the price difference should be between a below average QB and a below average QB?  

Considering my Monday papers don't have any NFL news that's an odd one. If you think my take on Cousins>Bortles is incorrect I'd like to hear why from a gameplay standpoint. Apart from run, what does Blake do better than Cousins as a Qb?

---