An Argument Against TE at 29

Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

An Argument Against TE at 29

JNev
Journeyman
Posts: 1,666
Threads: 36
Joined: Aug 2017
Reputation: 36

04-23-2018, 12:38 PM

(04-23-2018, 12:11 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Yeah - this is why most of us that are on the OL/TE bandwagon would prefer them in that order.

It's frustrating because I like Goedert so much more than the other guys and there are so many valuable interior OL projected to still be available Rd. 2. I probably agree with the article, but take away the Rd. designations and Goedert/Ragnow vs Hernandez/Andrews and I'd prefer the 1st option. In other words I think the drop off from Goedert to the rest of the TEs is much steeper than the 1st rd OL guys and who would be available with our 2nd pick.

I could easily get on board with 1. Rudolph 2. Ragnow/BAP OL 3. Ian Thomas though

Messages In This Thread

An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Bullseye - 04-23-2018, 11:46 AM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 12:11 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 12:38 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 12:39 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by knarnn - 04-23-2018, 01:09 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 01:22 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by pirkster - 04-23-2018, 12:43 PM

An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Andy G - 04-23-2018, 02:02 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 02:48 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by The Real Marty - 04-24-2018, 05:32 AM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 03:19 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 03:42 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:12 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:17 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:27 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:34 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 04:57 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 05:21 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 05:30 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 06:05 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 08:11 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 05:46 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Deacon - 04-24-2018, 08:44 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.