Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
An Argument Against TE at 29

#6
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2018, 01:13 PM by knarnn.)

(04-23-2018, 12:39 PM)Markulous Wrote: Good points.  We are in a legit SB window and TE won't really contribute to that right now.  OL would definitely contribute to that and we'd have a day 1 starter.

I get why some would be against drafting a TE but disagree to your line of reasoning. The draft isn't about right now. At least it shouldn't be for teams with established talent.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Bullseye - 04-23-2018, 11:46 AM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 12:11 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 12:39 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by knarnn - 04-23-2018, 01:09 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 01:22 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by pirkster - 04-23-2018, 12:43 PM
An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Andy G - 04-23-2018, 02:02 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 02:48 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 03:19 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 03:42 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:12 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:17 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:27 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:34 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 04:57 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 05:21 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 05:30 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 06:05 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 08:11 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 05:46 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Deacon - 04-24-2018, 08:44 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!