An Argument Against TE at 29

Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

An Argument Against TE at 29

JaG4LyFe
Veteran
Posts: 2,800
Threads: 18
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 38

#19

04-23-2018, 05:46 PM

(04-23-2018, 04:27 PM)JackCity Wrote:
(04-23-2018, 04:17 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Guard.
And if I selected a guard at #29 - I think "average" would be a disappointment.
AJ Cann was average in his rookie year and he went at #67.

In year 1? Definitely not for me. I think expecting any rookie to be above average right out of the gate is asking for disappointment, especially outside of the top 15ish blue chip type talent.
I'd hope the rookie showed the promise and traits you drafted him for but ultimately average is the expectation I'd go with.

I'd agree on guard impact wise too.

Robinson killed it last year. It's amazing that Seattle passed on Robinson with their weak offensive line that they fielded last season.

Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.

Messages In This Thread

An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Bullseye - 04-23-2018, 11:46 AM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 12:11 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 12:38 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 12:39 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by knarnn - 04-23-2018, 01:09 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 01:22 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by pirkster - 04-23-2018, 12:43 PM

An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Andy G - 04-23-2018, 02:02 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 02:48 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by The Real Marty - 04-24-2018, 05:32 AM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 03:19 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 03:42 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:12 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:17 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:27 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:34 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 04:57 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 05:21 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 05:30 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 06:05 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 08:11 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 05:46 PM

RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Deacon - 04-24-2018, 08:44 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.