(04-01-2019, 01:32 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(04-01-2019, 12:56 PM)jj82284 Wrote: 2.) An engineer u said?   "7 years 7 smears who cares"

There's a time when the stuff engineers do needs to be really precise and there's a time when it doesn't need to be really precise.

There's a time when the engineer is just using talk-to-text on his coffee break and there's a time when he's writing a formal report.

Don't u just hate when u go back and edit something but the quote function already immortalized it?  

As for the last paragraph...  Who needs the nutmeg now brother?

---

(04-01-2019, 02:50 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(04-01-2019, 01:43 PM)B2hibry Wrote: Does she though? For being so knowledgeable as you claim, she sure wears stupidity on her sleeve like a badge of honor.

She said that a constitutional amendment was passed to prevent FDR from running for a third term.
So yes, she knows the three things I said correctly.  One time there was no limits, there are limits now, and the change involved FDR.
She just has the order wrong. 
Is that significant to the story she was trying to tell or the point she was trying to make?  What if she had said, "They passed a constitutional amendment to prevent Harry Truman from running for a third term."  That would have been totally accurate, and probably supported the point she was actually trying to make.

Ur right.  Her story really falls apart when u consider that both Truman and johnson couldn't stand for re-elect and both the "bold policies" she advocates failed and are eventually going to bankrupt the county.  So in context ur right, her notching the timeline of the 22nd amendment is trivial compared to her general level of economic illiteracy.  But I keep carrying that water Mike.  Onward conservative soldiers!

---