(11-17-2018, 05:57 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-17-2018, 03:06 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: There are plenty of outspoken liberals here. They don't need you defending them; they can do it for themselves. 

I'd believe this if you played the conservative role in threads where there are more liberals than conservatives. Besides, how can someone whom claims to be a Republican / conservative never speak up against those he disagrees with? Most of your viewpoints aren't even remotely conservative. 

I have been on this board for almost 15 years and I don't think I've ever seen a thread where the conservatives were getting ganged up on.

(11-17-2018, 03:06 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: Just to be clear, unwanted physical contact isn't enough to be booted from the workplace? Who said it had to be violent? Who is even saying it is violent? Those sound like your words. Most people are just saying it's unacceptable.

I don't think you know how the burden of proof works. He touched her without her consent and without justification. Sure, it wasn't violent and I doubt people think it was harmful, but that's irrelevant when he was told to stop and refused AND then touched her to keep doing what he was told not to do. This isn't normal behavior, and you're saying it's on others to prove why this abnormal behavior is unacceptable.

There was a justification for the two of their arms running into each other.  They simply had different ideas about where the microphone should be.  There was no malicious or sexual intent.