Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump appointed judge orders Jim Acosta’s press pass be reissued

#76

(11-19-2018, 12:30 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-19-2018, 11:08 AM)MalabarJag Wrote: What the voters in Texas and California wanted in 1980 has nothing to do with the vast difference between the illegals in 1980 vs. the illegals of 2018, which a conservative (or anyone with a IQ higher than chopped liver) would instantly recognize as an apples to oranges comparison. Your first three paragraphs are a deflection.

I don't think a person actively and illegally committing a crime by crossing a border to take money from other people has the same dignity as me.
You can speak for yourself. And your position of claiming they deserve the fruits of other people's labors just because they are equally human does say a lot about YOU. Forced income redistribution has never been a conservative position.


As for the last paragraph, that's a flat out lie on your part (probably parroting a lie you read on one of the Far Left websites you frequent). Trump has been opposed to separating families, but chose to uphold the existing law that was in place under Obama. Of course a family would not be separated if they didn't break the law and enter the US illegally to begin with. The parents actively chose to have their family separated. I feel sorry for the children of such parents, but it's a big world with lots of evil and no magic wand to fix everything. If they were US citizens the child welfare authorities would remove them from those parents too.

And don't even try to claim these are "asylum" seekers. They could seek asylum in any of a dozen or more countries much closer than the US, with the same language and much similar cultural values. Most are coming here solely to live off the dollars taken by force from working Americans.

(1) The vast majority keep their court dates.  (2) They don't get money from the government unless they present enough evidence to the judges that they really are refugees.  (3) Less than 40,000 people per year are granted this status.  It's a drop in the bucket.  It's not a significant amount of money in the end.  It's such a small number for the reasons you cite: many of them realize that they'll fit in better and have more success in places like Mexico.

(4) I'm not actually a leftist, so if you want to blame Obama or Clinton for requiring families to be separated while these legal procedures go through, I'm not going to argue with you.  (5) Even if you're right about that, though, I still blame Trump for continuing it.  Tu quoque is a fallacy.

(1) Wrong!

(2) First off, you cited Reagan and Bush. They were not talking about just those seeking asylum. So you changed the focus of the discussion (congratulations, that now makes you an official TDS sufferer). Those coming here illegally do get money from the government (meaning the fruits of labor of American citizens taken by force). Just because the government isn't supposed to give them money doesn't mean they don't get it. Presumably so do the subset of "asylum seekers,' and whether or not they get it does not change the fact that that was why they came.

(3) Once again, your original video was not just about 'asylum seekers.' If there was no illegal entry and it was limited to 40,000 per year I'd guess that no one on this board would consider it a big deal. But that's not  what this is about, it's about hundreds of thousands of people illegally entering the US each year. In Reagan's day most came for jobs. Now, most come to partake in taxpayer dollars.


(4) You have defended Obama several times on this board. You continually cite lies that come from Leftist websites and memes, so I call [BLEEP] on your claim that you aren't a Leftist.

(5) The president doesn't micromanage the government. That was a program under the Justice Department continued by inertia (a good reason that the swamp needs to be drained), so if you blame anyone it should be Jeff Sessions. Trump spoke against it when it was revealed by the press (using photos of children in cages from the Obama era). Funny how that the press never criticized the program when Obama was POTUS. That there is irrefutable evidence that the mainstream press is totally Left-wing biased, yet you still cite Politifact and other Left wing publications as if they were unbiased.



                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Trump appointed judge orders Jim Acosta’s press pass be reissued - by MalabarJag - 11-19-2018, 08:43 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!