(04-09-2019, 07:33 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(04-09-2019, 06:09 PM)B2hibry Wrote: She resigned because congress would not allow her to do her job. She was also being frivolously sued by left wing groups in an effort to undermine her and pressure her. Now she has these groups doxing and encouraging companies to boycott her future employment. Is this good? Would you hold on to the reigns with resistance at every corner knowing you will ultimately be the one blamed? The Dems didn't think she was experienced enough anyways so no harm no foul right? Yes, her understanding her limitations and being cognizant of the House's lack of legislative ability and moving on is a good thing in that sort of toxic environment.

Not sure what engineering certification you have but would you jump at a "order" from the president of the certification organization? Nah.

"Congress would not let her do her job."
Her job is to enforce the law that congress makes.
Do we need to review the Constitution?

Please do. This is getting unnecessarily drawn out.

Lack of proper funding, people, barriers, infrastructure, and immigration reform. Yep, she sure had all the tools to do her job. Maybe congress (specifically House) can take time away from unicorn chasing to support U.S. departments and agencies with what they require at the advisement of heads of said offices.

---